Go nuts. Have a ball haha Apparently.Guys!! More news about games running at resolutions or some shit!!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Go nuts. Have a ball haha Apparently.
Don't you f*cking start![QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="balfe1990"]
Gender =/= Sex, FF
balfe1990
I've already...transitioned
[QUOTE="Rocker6"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"] Stahp!!freedomfreak
Aight... pick your poison.
Lul, biased lemz uzing no-name guy az sorce... evn if tru, PS4 native rez iz teh 1081p!
SDC, owned, u butthurt, Kaz this, Kaz that.
Something about Kaz. Good start. You need to get on Tormentos and Ron's level though.I'm not going to buy the f**k-in 7830 prototype or 7850 (re-flash to W5000 which disables 2 CUs and down clock to 800Mhz). If you can't get around AMD's marketing BS then that's your problem.
 I have already estimated 8 core Jaguar i.e. it's closer to AMD Bobcat and it's far from AMD Piledriver. Audio DSP details can be gathered from the best/cheap low power audio DSP chip in the market (guess, MS would be licensing it and it's not CELL or PPE) i.e. it's nowhere near AMD Ontario APU. LZ and JPEG hardware from known FPGA implementations.
The workloads between a PC GCN and PS4's GCN is different. In a given time period, a single Intel Core i5/i7's CPU core can generate larger ACE GPU command bucket size than AMD Jaguar.
At 1.6Ghz and Cinebench benchmarks, it takes roughly two AMD Jaguar cores to match one Intel Sandybridge ULV CPU core (1.6Ghz).
A single 3.2Ghz Intel Ivybridge core can easily beat AMD Jaguar quad cores @ 1.6Ghz. My Intel Core i5/i7 Quad Cores can cover my 7970's ACE count and magnitude.
PS4's GCN design was designed for it's host CPU. AMD Jaguar 8 cores collectively populate it's GCN's ACE units. With PS4, you can't waste a CPU core to manage GPU ACE command buffer.
Btw, Sony is treating PS4's GCN like a CELL processor hence why you have greater number of ACEs. MS (Xbox 360/X1/PC) is treating it's GCN like a PC GpGPU i.e. having large ACE bucket size with less ACE count. PS4's ACE doesn't change GCN's wavefront processing capability e.g. my 7970 murders PS4's GCN.
PC doesn't have a CELL processor to patch it's 7800 GTX i.e. PC's solution for this problem was to buy NVIDIA CUDA type GPU. 7800 GTX type situation is less likely to occur with X1 and PS4 generation i.e. common AMD GCN hardware.
Something about Kaz. Good start. You need to get on Tormentos and Ron's level though.[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]
Aight... pick your poison.
Lul, biased lemz uzing no-name guy az sorce... evn if tru, PS4 native rez iz teh 1081p!
SDC, owned, u butthurt, Kaz this, Kaz that.
Rocker6
I'm not going to buy the f**k-in 7830 prototype or 7850 (re-flash to W5000 which disables 2 CUs and down clock to 800Mhz). If you can't get around AMD's marketing BS then that's your problem.
 I have already estimated 8 core Jaguar i.e. it's closer to AMD Bobcat and it's far from AMD Piledriver. Audio DSP details can be gathered from the best/cheap low power audio DSP chip in the market (guess, MS would be licensing it and it's not CELL or PPE) i.e. it's nowhere near AMD Ontario APU. LZ and JPEG hardware from known FPGA implementations.
The workloads between a PC GCN and PS4's GCN is different. In a given time period, a single Intel Core i5/i7's CPU core can generate larger ACE GPU command bucket size than AMD Jaguar.
At 1.6Ghz and Cinebench benchmarks, it takes roughly two AMD Jaguar cores to match one Intel Sandybridge ULV CPU core (1.6Ghz).
A single 3.2Ghz Intel Ivybridge core can easily beat AMD Jaguar quad cores @ 1.6Ghz. My Intel Core i5/i7 Quad Cores can cover my 7970's ACE count and magnitude.
PS4's GCN design was designed for it's host CPU. AMD Jaguar 8 cores collectively populate it's GCN's ACE units. With PS4, you can't waste a CPU core to manage GPU ACE command buffer.
Btw, Sony is treating PS4's GCN like a CELL processor hence why you have greater number of ACEs. MS (Xbox 360/X1/PC) is treating it's GCN like a PC GpGPU i.e. having large ACE bucket size with less ACE count. PS4's ACE doesn't change GCN's wavefront processing capability e.g. my 7970 murders PS4's GCN.
PC doesn't have a CELL processor to patch it's 7800 GTX i.e. PC's solution for this problem was to buy NVIDIA CUDA type GPU. 7800 GTX type situation is less likely to occur with X1 and PS4 generation i.e. common AMD GCN hardware.
Lol that's pretty good.
hi is this thread about shemans?silversix_
By looking at his genetalia. Until you have not seen said genetalia, she remains a mere woman.[QUOTE="parkurtommo"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]
How can we know a man is a man?
Rocker6
You idiot, GDDR5 traces are full-duplex, they can communicate with the stacked Bobcat CPU and Piledriver GPU cores at the same time. The PCI-E lanes are the only bottleneck, but low timings help increase the GFLOPS. R9-208X says hi.
Enough with your Nvidia fanboyism, you have no idea what you're talking about. It's not my fault you can't see through their BS marketting.
Blasphemy!
As you can see in this chart, Nvidia has a clear edge.
[QUOTE="Rocker6"][QUOTE="parkurtommo"] By looking at his genetalia. Until you have not seen said genetalia, she remains a mere woman.clyde46
You idiot, GDDR5 traces are full-duplex, they can communicate with the stacked Bobcat CPU and Piledriver GPU cores at the same time. The PCI-E lanes are the only bottleneck, but low timings help increase the GFLOPS. R9-208X says hi.
Enough with your Nvidia fanboyism, you have no idea what you're talking about. It's not my fault you can't see through their BS marketting.
Can always trust you to bring the lulz. :lol:VLIW =/= GCN. Get that through your thick skull already.
7850 is built from the same waffers as my 7950, but its 32 CU are better due to 32 KB instruction cache, reducing the rendering pipeline to 27 steps.
I7 ULV benchmarks say hi.
Now, do you understand why Nvidia TITAN is badly bottlenecked by its VRAM interface?
[QUOTE="Rocker6"]
[QUOTE="parkurtommo"] By looking at his genetalia. Until you have not seen said genetalia, she remains a mere woman.parkurtommo
You idiot, GDDR5 traces are full-duplex, they can communicate with the stacked Bobcat CPU and Piledriver GPU cores at the same time. The PCI-E lanes are the only bottleneck, but low timings help increase the GFLOPS. R9-208X says hi.
Enough with your Nvidia fanboyism, you have no idea what you're talking about. It's not my fault you can't see through their BS marketting.
Blasphemy!As you can see in this chart, Nvidia has a clear edge.
False, you can see it clear as day Nvidia drew the short end of the stick.
Blasphemy![QUOTE="parkurtommo"]
[QUOTE="Rocker6"]
You idiot, GDDR5 traces are full-duplex, they can communicate with the stacked Bobcat CPU and Piledriver GPU cores at the same time. The PCI-E lanes are the only bottleneck, but low timings help increase the GFLOPS. R9-208X says hi.
Enough with your Nvidia fanboyism, you have no idea what you're talking about. It's not my fault you can't see through their BS marketting.
Rocker6
As you can see in this chart, Nvidia has a clear edge.
False, you can see it clear as day Nvidia drew the short end of the stick.
:lol: China.
Something about Kaz. Good start. You need to get on Tormentos and Ron's level though.[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]
Aight... pick your poison.
Lul, biased lemz uzing no-name guy az sorce... evn if tru, PS4 native rez iz teh 1081p!
SDC, owned, u butthurt, Kaz this, Kaz that.
Rocker6
I'm not going to buy the f**k-in 7830 prototype or 7850 (re-flash to W5000 which disables 2 CUs and down clock to 800Mhz). If you can't get around AMD's marketing BS then that's your problem.
 I have already estimated 8 core Jaguar i.e. it's closer to AMD Bobcat and it's far from AMD Piledriver. Audio DSP details can be gathered from the best/cheap low power audio DSP chip in the market (guess, MS would be licensing it and it's not CELL or PPE) i.e. it's nowhere near AMD Ontario APU. LZ and JPEG hardware from known FPGA implementations.
The workloads between a PC GCN and PS4's GCN is different. In a given time period, a single Intel Core i5/i7's CPU core can generate larger ACE GPU command bucket size than AMD Jaguar.
At 1.6Ghz and Cinebench benchmarks, it takes roughly two AMD Jaguar cores to match one Intel Sandybridge ULV CPU core (1.6Ghz).
A single 3.2Ghz Intel Ivybridge core can easily beat AMD Jaguar quad cores @ 1.6Ghz. My Intel Core i5/i7 Quad Cores can cover my 7970's ACE count and magnitude.
PS4's GCN design was designed for it's host CPU. AMD Jaguar 8 cores collectively populate it's GCN's ACE units. With PS4, you can't waste a CPU core to manage GPU ACE command buffer.
Btw, Sony is treating PS4's GCN like a CELL processor hence why you have greater number of ACEs. MS (Xbox 360/X1/PC) is treating it's GCN like a PC GpGPU i.e. having large ACE bucket size with less ACE count. PS4's ACE doesn't change GCN's wavefront processing capability e.g. my 7970 murders PS4's GCN.
PC doesn't have a CELL processor to patch it's 7800 GTX i.e. PC's solution for this problem was to buy NVIDIA CUDA type GPU. 7800 GTX type situation is less likely to occur with X1 and PS4 generation i.e. common AMD GCN hardware.
:lol: uncanny
Log in to comment