Poll GTA 5 screens: Can you tell which version they're from? (25 votes)
Screenshots from different versions of GTA5. Can you tell which platform each is from? Hint: none of the screens are from the PS4 or 360 versions.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Screenshots from different versions of GTA5. Can you tell which platform each is from? Hint: none of the screens are from the PS4 or 360 versions.
theres no point when you dont post native res screens
So in your words the only noteworthy difference is resolution?
theres no point when you dont post native res screens
between the ps4 and pc versions? yes the biggest difference by far is the ability to use msaa and or higher resolutions to reduce the aliasing. there are other improvements, but even then, post native res screens
theres no point when you dont post native res screens
So in your words the only noteworthy difference is resolution?
multiplats use the same assets across the board, so stuff like geometry stays the same. The advantage of PC is that everything will be slightly better depending on your rig and the resources it has to spare. Effects, textures, draw-distance, frame-rate, etc., all better on PC. So with shit screens like these nobody can tell the difference, since lower res render all those slight advantages irrelevant, and you can't even tell frame-rate from a picture either.
theres no point when you dont post native res screens
So in your words the only noteworthy difference is resolution?
multiplats use the same assets across the board, so stuff like geometry stays the same. So the advantage of PC is that everything will be slightly better at best. Effects, textures, draw-distance, frame-rate etc. So if you provide shit screen like these nobody can tell the difference, since lower res render all those slight advantages irrelevant.
Slighty? I call BS.
theres no point when you dont post native res screens
between the ps4 and pc versions? yes the biggest difference by far is the ability to use msaa and or higher resolutions to reduce the aliasing. there are other improvements, but even then, post native res screens
You can't tell the difference between the versions without knowing the native rez? Obviously not. First thing you did was right click the images to check the resolution knowing they were different for each platform.
@Pray_to_me: no the first thing i did was open each image in its own tab expecting to see native res screens. when i saw they were all 720p i just closed them.
Because you couldn't infer wich was which without knowing the resolution. That part is obvious.
@Pray_to_me: no the first thing i did was open each image in its own tab expecting to see native res screens. when i saw they were all 720p i just closed them.
Jesus Christ I pray that you lock this shit.
Pretty sure Jesus doesn't visit SW.
Then I will pray to Allah. Someone will come to this shit thread and lock it.
How about you don't downsample the screenshots.
Lower resolution hides details.
Also how about comparing two screenshots of the same area.
Although, even without doing that I can tell the top two screenshots are from consoles and the bottom one is PC.
So you just got rekt.
what stupid a** comparison is this? Compare 2 same images on the same area between 2 versions and then tell me you cant tell the difference and not 3 completely unrelated images
Everybody knows the differences between PC versions this early in the gen is limited to resolution, framerate and some draw distance shit. No meaningful graphics tech is added to PC games at this stage. Nvidia works exists, but it's proprietary and only a few games are utilizing it, and to very small degrees at that. Though to be fair resolution and framerate alone takes a lot of surplus horsepower. It's just not enough to call ''a generation ahead'' or whatever people like to say.
Everybody knows the differences between PC versions this early in the gen is limited to resolution, framerate and some draw distance shit. No meaningful graphics tech is added to PC games at this stage. Nvidia works exists, but it's proprietary and only a few games are utilizing it, and to very small degrees at that. Though to be fair resolution and framerate alone takes a lot of surplus horsepower. It's just not enough to call ''a generation ahead'' or whatever people like to say.
Hey look I'm going to do what the TC does but much worse but I'm actually comparing something
what stupid a** comparison is this? Compare 2 same images on the same area between 2 versions and then tell me you cant tell the difference and not 3 completely unrelated images
Who said I was making a comparison?
what stupid a** comparison is this? Compare 2 same images on the same area between 2 versions and then tell me you cant tell the difference and not 3 completely unrelated images
Who said I was making a comparison?
Correct this is a comparison
looks like they are all compressed bullshit from youtube, peasants trying too hard again? none of those even are at 1080p and i highly doubt pc uses max settings (if there is one)
I know this is a PC troll thread and I also know that I'm correct as I've seen all of these screenshots before, so this thread might as well be locked.
1. Xbox One
2. PlayStation 3
3. PC
Lock thread.
if the last one really is PC, it's not maxed. Look how sharp the shadows are, with PCSS they're far more realistic
Everybody knows the differences between PC versions this early in the gen is limited to resolution, framerate and some draw distance shit. No meaningful graphics tech is added to PC games at this stage. Nvidia works exists, but it's proprietary and only a few games are utilizing it, and to very small degrees at that. Though to be fair resolution and framerate alone takes a lot of surplus horsepower. It's just not enough to call ''a generation ahead'' or whatever people like to say.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment