http://forums.gametrailers.com/thread/740233
enjoy (its in french btw)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Afraid not.no loading?
like tony hawk where all the buildings, streets, and ramps popin 5 feet in front of you
GTR_FX
It's upscaled
www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=415
The TRAILER, is upscaled - the game is nearly a year away from release and we've still not seen Jaffe's "amazing" graphics which tops anything he has ever seen - Playing GoWII still looks amazing, im sure Santa Monica can pull off a 60fps + No Loading Time + Native Full HD 1080p combo, especially with Insomniac and Naughty Dog as their third and fourth arm.It's upscaled
www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=415
The TRAILER, is upscaled - the game is nearly a year away from release and we've still not seen Jaffe's "amazing" graphics which tops anything he has ever seen - Playing GoWII still looks amazing, im sure Santa Monica can pull off a 60fps + No Loading Time + Native Full HD 1080p combo, especially with Insomniac and Naughty Dog as their third and fourth arm. This is something MS will need to improve on. Sony just have superior First Party devs. They're ambitious and hardworking, and SONY are always more then happy to help them. When Sony's first party create a game, it always raises a bar, Killzone's graphics being the most recent. Whereas ... MS just ... I dunno. MS don't seem to care.This is something MS will need to improve on. Sony just have superior First Party devs. They're ambitious and hardworking, and SONY are always more then happy to help them. When Sony's first party create a game, it always raises a bar, Killzone's graphics being the most recent. Whereas ... MS just ... I dunno. MS don't seem to care.cuddlesofwar
I couldn't agree more. MS don't seem to foster the same kind of dedication and loyalty from developers. They just seem a lot more corperate, i.e. if its making money then dont fix it. Sony seem to have a bit more of a fighting spirit. Having said that, lets see what E3 brings this year, MS seem a little quiet and have been for a while in my books.
No like most PS3 games, with a 60 minute install, hahaha. J/K have you ever played God of War before? The 3 of them were the best looking games on their respective consoles and they had little to no loading. It'll easily be possible for this especially since it doesn't look like the best looking PS3 game (ATM)no loading?
like tony hawk where all the buildings, streets, and ramps popin 5 feet in front of you
GTR_FX
[QUOTE="speedsix"]i was expecting native 1080p due to the lackluster graphics me too, i mean if its going to pull all that off then TC, you might as well put an = average graphics after that equation.It's upscaled
www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=415
GTR_FX
its sad that we make a big deal about features that should be standard by now.VideoGameGuy
Completely true. One of the major things that put me off from buying a PS1 back in the days was loading times. I hate them and it's long overdue that they are going away, for good. I can buy that it loads before a map but not in the middle of it, it takes you out of the experience, a la Oblivion. Also why is Sony marketing the PS3 as a much more superior machine when very few to almost zero games are native 1080p + 60fps on their system. I'm not impressed, in fact I expect that and much more from God Of War 3.
Sounds great. :)
PS: It just says the framerate stays steady with lots of enemys on screen, not 60FPS. My french is good enough to know that. And also it loads while the cinematics are playing.
[QUOTE="GTR_FX"]No like most PS3 games, with a 60 minute install, hahaha. J/K have you ever played God of War before? The 3 of them were the best looking games on their respective consoles and they had little to no loading. It'll easily be possible for this especially since it doesn't look like the best looking PS3 game (ATM) wait..no loading as in once it loads it steams data? that nothing new :o I thought they meant theres no loading at all, like not even a first load I guess that makes senseno loading?
like tony hawk where all the buildings, streets, and ramps popin 5 feet in front of you
bobbetybob
[QUOTE="speedsix"]The TRAILER, is upscaled - the game is nearly a year away from release and we've still not seen Jaffe's "amazing" graphics which tops anything he has ever seen - Playing GoWII still looks amazing, im sure Santa Monica can pull off a 60fps + No Loading Time + Native Full HD 1080p combo, especially with Insomniac and Naughty Dog as their third and fourth arm.It's upscaled
www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=415
Dante865
Why because all of their games have been 60 frames, no loading times and native 1080P? Please I really really doubt it'll be even close to any of that.
[QUOTE="Dante865"][QUOTE="speedsix"]The TRAILER, is upscaled - the game is nearly a year away from release and we've still not seen Jaffe's "amazing" graphics which tops anything he has ever seen - Playing GoWII still looks amazing, im sure Santa Monica can pull off a 60fps + No Loading Time + Native Full HD 1080p combo, especially with Insomniac and Naughty Dog as their third and fourth arm.It's upscaled
www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=415
kingtito
Why because all of their games have been 60 frames, no loading times and native 1080P? Please I really really doubt it'll be even close to any of that.
Why? Santa Monica were basically wizards with the PS2's hardware. And as he said, with Insomniac and Naughty Dog providing support it's not so far-fetched.[QUOTE="kingtito"][QUOTE="Dante865"] The TRAILER, is upscaled - the game is nearly a year away from release and we've still not seen Jaffe's "amazing" graphics which tops anything he has ever seen - Playing GoWII still looks amazing, im sure Santa Monica can pull off a 60fps + No Loading Time + Native Full HD 1080p combo, especially with Insomniac and Naughty Dog as their third and fourth arm.inertk
Why because all of their games have been 60 frames, no loading times and native 1080P? Please I really really doubt it'll be even close to any of that.
Why? Santa Monica were basically wizards with the PS2's hardware. And as he said, with Insomniac and Naughty Dog providing support it's not so far-fetched. in case you forgot this is NOT the PS2. How many big games have come out with no loading, 60+ frames and native 1080P? That's what I thought.[QUOTE="inertk"][QUOTE="kingtito"]Why? Santa Monica were basically wizards with the PS2's hardware. And as he said, with Insomniac and Naughty Dog providing support it's not so far-fetched. in case you forgot this is NOT the PS2. How many big games have come out with no loading, 60+ frames and native 1080P? That's what I thought. we shall see. They are great devs and I believe all GOW were 60 fps. They seem to be using the Uncharted tech for the same no loading. MLB09 is 1080p and 60 fps.Why because all of their games have been 60 frames, no loading times and native 1080P? Please I really really doubt it'll be even close to any of that.
kingtito
[QUOTE="inertk"][QUOTE="kingtito"]Why? Santa Monica were basically wizards with the PS2's hardware. And as he said, with Insomniac and Naughty Dog providing support it's not so far-fetched. in case you forgot this is NOT the PS2. How many big games have come out with no loading, 60+ frames and native 1080P? That's what I thought. Exactly, it's NOT the PS2 and despite having the weakest hardware last generation they managed to create some of the best looking games available WHILE running at 60fps. But if you want to be cynical, think of it like this -- all the high profile action games this generation are 60FPS, no? DMC + NG. It's only natural progression.Why because all of their games have been 60 frames, no loading times and native 1080P? Please I really really doubt it'll be even close to any of that.
kingtito
I don't get you saying how many big games have done that though, put it this way. How many big games were released 3-4 years after each consoles respective launch, backed financially by either Sony or Microsoft to the extent GoW3 will be AND supported by 3 of the best studios when it comes to technical achievement? It was evident ONE game would eventually hit this benchmark and I think the conditions for this one warrant some optimism.
[QUOTE="kingtito"][QUOTE="inertk"] Why? Santa Monica were basically wizards with the PS2's hardware. And as he said, with Insomniac and Naughty Dog providing support it's not so far-fetched.inertkin case you forgot this is NOT the PS2. How many big games have come out with no loading, 60+ frames and native 1080P? That's what I thought. Exactly, it's NOT the PS2 and despite having the weakest hardware last generation they managed to create some of the best looking games available WHILE running at 60fps. But if you want to be cynical, think of it like this -- all the high profile action games this generation are 60FPS, no? DMC + NG. It's only natural progression.
I don't get you saying how many big games have done that though, put it this way. How many big games were released 3-4 years after each consoles respective launch, backed financially by either Sony or Microsoft to the extent GoW3 will be AND supported by 3 of the best studios when it comes to technical achievement? It was evident ONE game would eventually hit this benchmark and I think the conditions for this one warrant some optimism.
kingtito: No - because Warhawk runs native 1080p without Loading - and God of War II ran in 720p HD in the NTSC region without loading, and i have yet to see a game do that on the PS2 beside Gran Turismo. - So yeah, i believe fully in SCE Santa Monica, Insomniac and Naughty Dog. I also rely on ND to eliminate all load times just as they did with Uncharted. And im sure no one would run the risk of hyping a game, especially God of War, to such limits. Oh and one more thing, weren't all God of War's 60fps? It's not hard, i mean its not as if its got millions of moving objects on screen. But fair enough, God of War III has pushed about 50 enemies on screen so i would like to see how they do it! :)
killzowned24: Oh yeah i just remembered MLB09! Theres something for you.
inertk: Exactly, 3 of some of the best companies around at the moment. I think something really special can come out of this game!
[QUOTE="Dante865"][QUOTE="Roushrsh"]Seeing as how the game doesn't look that great...I guess its possible. I'm still waiting for a game that's 120fps with native 1080p :) GTR_FXIsn't 120FPS not visible to the human eye? no, the human eye can see beyond 120 fps You know what i mean - we cant see the difference after 100fps.... or was it 100Hz? Haha i dont remember :D
[QUOTE="GTR_FX"][QUOTE="Dante865"] Isn't 120FPS not visible to the human eye?Dante865no, the human eye can see beyond 120 fps You know what i mean - we cant see the difference after 100fps.... or was it 100Hz? Haha i dont remember :D If you read it on these forums or on some random site, I wouldn't trust it. I remember when P.C. gamers were bashing console owners for having games with only 30fps, some people would say stuff like our eyes can't see past 40 fps or 75 is the limit and that's already perfect so 30 doesn't make much of a difference.
[QUOTE="speedsix"]The TRAILER, is upscaled - the game is nearly a year away from release and we've still not seen Jaffe's "amazing" graphics which tops anything he has ever seen - Playing GoWII still looks amazing, im sure Santa Monica can pull off a 60fps + No Loading Time + Native Full HD 1080p combo, especially with Insomniac and Naughty Dog as their third and fourth arm.I would be VERY careful in taking a definitive stance on this. A lot of people said that about MGS IV and Resistance. Both are sub 1080p games. Often to put in more effects they will sacrifice the resolution in the end as it is far less important.It's upscaled
www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=415
Dante865
No loading times I can believe but that AND full 1080p visuals? Not a chance.
[QUOTE="Roushrsh"]Seeing as how the game doesn't look that great...I guess its possible. I'm still waiting for a game that's 120fps with native 1080p :) Dante865Isn't 120FPS not visible to the human eye?
Depends who you are.
For most people beyond 60fps makes no noticeable difference.
However there are some people (like myself) who can tell the Differencebeyond 60, and even 75FPS.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment