http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyhAHk1mPwQ&feature=player_embedded#!
EDIT: I retract my previous statement but I still say its ugly.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
What are you talking about, the new Goldeneye remake is probably the best looking Dreamcast game I've ever seen.
I laughed so hard I choked on my coffee.What are you talking about, the new Goldeneye remake is probably the best looking Dreamcast game I've ever seen.
MetroidPrimePwn
I was referring to the character models. I guess I should have stated that.Zero5000X
Oh. That's a bit more understandable, although I still think the difference is pretty significant.
I was referring to the character models. I guess I should have stated that.Zero5000X
N64:
Wii:
Slightly better? :?
Wii:
Slightly better? :?
Stevo_the_gamer
In terms of comparisons, the Wii version looks way better.
Those sceenshots do look damn ugly, though. I hope they improve.
It looks good for what the Wii can do (without looking like a rainbow dreamland).tomarlyn
Seriously? The game looks ugly as sin and there is no excuse for that. It isn't "good" even by the Wii's standards...
A much better looking game that isn't "Rainbow Fairyland" or whatever. I know Goldeneye is still early in development but it is still fugly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyhAHk1mPwQ&feature=player_embedded#!
EDIT: I retract my previous statement but I still say its ugly.
Zero5000X
This is the first time I have seen someone retract a statement in SW. What is the punishment for that.
In terms of comparisons, the Wii version looks way better.For what it's worth, it's still a Wii game. So my thoughts on decent and good looking is tough to voice since I'm a PC gamer. :PThose sceenshots do look damn ugly, though. I hope they improve.
standarddamage
does it really matter? really? People who play Goldeneye do not play it for the graphics. The N64 version has looked ugly as sin for years now, it still doesn't put me off playing the occasional multiplayer game with friends. Anybody expecting revolutionary graphics from the remake are missing the point.
For what it's worth, it's still a Wii game. So my thoughts on decent and good looking is tough to voice since I'm a PC gamer. :P
Stevo_the_gamer
I understand completely. :D
But even in terms of Wii games, it's really ugly. Reminds me of when I played Medal of Honor: Heroes 2.
I completely agree... I see a much larger difference in visuals from Goldeneye n64 to Wii than I do PD 64 to XBLA.Wow anybody who says "slightly better" needs to re-watch that video. The games at the least are one generation apart in terms of tech. The Wii isn't the most powerful thing on the market but it holds up way better than the N64 in every single way.
Wasdie
i don't know why graphics matter so much.themagicbum9720
They don't. I'm still getting the game regaurdless of how "crappy" it looks. (honestly it looks fine by me.)
Sure, the wii Goldeneye will look, graphically, better than the N64 version. But does anyone actually think the game will be good, just because they are using the Goldeneye name again, rather than a newer Bond movie or an original Bond game? It's not like any of the other Bond games have been good. Quantum of Solace Wii version has a 54 on metacritic (didn't even get rated on GS, although the 360 version got a 7). I'm expecting a very mediocre shooter with very mediocre graphics.Wow anybody who says "slightly better" needs to re-watch that video. The games at the least are one generation apart in terms of tech. The Wii isn't the most powerful thing on the market but it holds up way better than the N64 in every single way.
Wasdie
[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]It looks good for what the Wii can do (without looking like a rainbow dreamland).bobcheeseball
Seriously? The game looks ugly as sin and there is no excuse for that. It isn't "good" even by the Wii's standards...
A much better looking game that isn't "Rainbow Fairyland" or whatever. I know Goldeneye is still early in development but it is still fugly.
C'mon dude, thats not fair. Its Retro. Their games are up there with the very best.
I thought the video looked good.
what I'm more interested in is the fact that its not a remake, Its a reboot.
They are taking the original game and all most completely rebooting it.
Its not peirce brosnan its the one latest bond the guy from casino royale and they are pushing it up in time frame so its taing place in 2010, changing guns, using old enviorments but putting new ones in the game.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment