@SolidGame_basic said:
@jaydan said:
@Pedro said:
@jaydan: No stress. I just find it odd that the OP mentions the number of user reviews as a metric of worth and if that same logic was applied to other games this game would be so far down the totem pole.
We both question the same thing but for different reasons.
My question is why use Metacritic when it is long-proven to be unstable - why use a rating site that ALLOWS smear campaigns against or for games in the form of review-bombing?
Of course we can make our own threads posting links to Metacritic as long as it suits our own bias, and more people will say how shit the aggregator actually is.
So if millions of people like the Mona Lisa, but you don't - that's the same as no one liking it or knowing it existed?
The main reason why the Mona Lisa is as famous as it is: there was a point in time it got stolen and it was missing from the world. This happened back in 1911. It built the notoriety it has today because it was missing before it ultimately got returned to the Louvre. Did you know that bit of history?
People don't even know why they love the Mona Lisa, they just love it because it is famous. If you are in Paris, it just is one of those landmarks everyone has to see for the sake of seeing it. Most people don't realize how tiny the painting actually is, and to see it today you have to stand across a crowded room full of people trying to squint your eyes past the bullet-proof glass.
In my opinion, and as an avid art history fan, I think it is a highly overrated painting. The way it's presented today is what you would call a "tourist trap" destination.
Ultimately, I'm not sure what point you're trying to make with that one.
Log in to comment