Fallout Sells More Than Oblivian in 1st Week. MS vs PS3 2:1 ratio

  • 56 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for RobWil
RobWil

144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 RobWil
Member since 2005 • 144 Posts

360 - %55

PS3 - %28

PC - %17

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/fallout-3-outsells-all-previous-titles-in-the-series-combined

Avatar image for -General_Ram-
-General_Ram-

998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 -General_Ram-
Member since 2008 • 998 Posts

I feel at peace with the world.

Lemmings getting the most.

Hermits buying into LIVE for PC

Cows gettign the short end of the stick yet again.

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts

PC - Most people probably pirated it :P

X360 - Great game!

PS3 - Who would want to buy this pathetic excuse for a port. Maybe if Bethesda actually tried, more people would have bought it.

Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts

PC - Most people probably pirated it :P

X360 - Great game!

PS3 - Who would want to buy this pathetic excuse for a port. Maybe if Bethesda actually tried, more people would have bought it.

II_Seraphim_II

I bought it, and I love it.

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.
Avatar image for Arsuz
Arsuz

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Arsuz
Member since 2003 • 2318 Posts
Please be accurate when posting numbers. In this case you should have added "in the UK" as these charts are from the UK. A little thing I noticed is that fallout 3 has been on the number 2 or number 1 spot top sellers on STEAM switching back and forth with L4D. I wish there was a way to quantize this fact, but I'm sure it's selling pretty well over steam since the steam version doens't have any DRM.(right?)
Avatar image for lusitanogamer
lusitanogamer

9338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 lusitanogamer
Member since 2006 • 9338 Posts

MS - %55

PS3 - %28

PC - %17

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/fallout-3-outsells-all-previous-titles-in-the-series-combined

RobWil

So Microsoft's console is called MS now? Didn't know about that.:P

I'm not surprised with these numbers. A lot of PS3 owners have skipped Fallout 3 because of all the bad rep that version has. From the experience i've had with the game so far, i say they're missing out big time.

Avatar image for Flamestos
Flamestos

2487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Flamestos
Member since 2004 • 2487 Posts

And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.Eltroz

Please what's done is done. If you're going to take on developing a PS3 game now that it's difficulties are common knowledge I expect a developer to put out a quality product or not bother at all Plus Bethesda has PS3 experience this is just a sloppy port.

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

PC - Most people probably pirated it :P

X360 - Great game!

PS3 - Who would want to buy this pathetic excuse for a port. Maybe if Bethesda actually tried, more people would have bought it.

rockguy92

I bought it, and I love it.

Really? I was just assuming there :P Havent played the PS3 version. My lil bro just bought the X360 version. he luvs it to death, but I played a bit and found it too much like Oblivion for my tastes (and i hated oblivion) :( Im probably just gonna go in a corner and pray that sum fan makes a Fallout3 and puts it online and I get to download it before Bethesda tells the fans to take it down.

Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts
[QUOTE="RobWil"]

MS - %55

PS3 - %28

PC - %17

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/fallout-3-outsells-all-previous-titles-in-the-series-combined

lusitanogamer

So Microsoft's console is called MS now? Didn't know about that.:P

I'm not surprised with these numbers. A lot of PS3 owners have skipped Fallout 3 because of all the bad rep that version has. From the experience i've had with the game so far, i say they're missing out big time.

Agreed.

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.Flamestos

Please what's done is done. If you're going to take on developing a PS3 game now the it's difficulties are common knowldge I expect a developer to put out a quality product or not bother at all Plus Bethesda has PS3 experience this is just a sloppy port.

So you think a developer should spend millions of dollors and man hors more on the PS3 then the other two systems? That is crazy. It is not like the PS3 hardware and software sales warrent that much extra work. Just be thankfull the PS3 got any kind of port. It is all Sony's fault for making a console harder to develope for.
Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts
I want to get this but honestly it's taking a back seat to Little Big Planet and Resistance 2. I have a feeling a lot of PS3 owners are feeling the same way.
Avatar image for Flamestos
Flamestos

2487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Flamestos
Member since 2004 • 2487 Posts
[QUOTE="Flamestos"]

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.Eltroz

Please what's done is done. If you're going to take on developing a PS3 game now the it's difficulties are common knowldge I expect a developer to put out a quality product or not bother at all Plus Bethesda has PS3 experience this is just a sloppy port.

So you think a developer should spend millions of dollors and man hors more on the PS3 then the other two systems? That is crazy. It is not like the PS3 hardware and software sales warrent that much extra work. Just be thankfull the PS3 got any kind of port. It is all Sony's fault for making a console harder to develope for.

Yes, I think they should if they're going to make the game for a system that has those kind of development "flaws". We're not talking about a developer new to the PS3 hardware who have no idea how the system works and how much it costs to get a their game to run smoothly. Oblivion was the best console version between it and the 360.

I can choose to buy the 360 version which I am next week but it's not fair to PS3 only owners to get a sloppy port.

I never said Sony didn't share any of the blame but in the big picture Bethesda made the decision to make a PS3 version and then release a half ***ed port.

Avatar image for lusitanogamer
lusitanogamer

9338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 lusitanogamer
Member since 2006 • 9338 Posts
Didn't Bethesda start working on the PS3 version like one year later? It's what i heard and if it's true, how can anyone be blaming Sony for the inferior port. It's clear Bethesda didn't want to bother as much with the PS3 version, probably because of the smaller install base and expected lower sales, not because the PS3 is harder to develop for. They have experience with the PS3, i'm sure it's not development nightmare anymore for them. If it was made in all platforms at the same time, i'm sure the PS3 version could be on par with the PC and 360 versions. Look at EA. Either they use the PS3 as lead platform or develop all versions at the same time and look at the results: Dead Space, Mirrors Edge, Burnout Paradise, all look the same on both PS3 and 360.
Avatar image for mingo123
mingo123

9005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 mingo123
Member since 2007 • 9005 Posts

PC - Most people probably pirated it :P

X360 - Great game!

PS3 - Who would want to buy this pathetic excuse for a port. Maybe if Bethesda actually tried, more people would have bought it.

II_Seraphim_II

its not pathetic, just a bit worser then 360 version

Avatar image for Eddie5vs1
Eddie5vs1

6085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 Eddie5vs1
Member since 2004 • 6085 Posts

I feel at peace with the world.

Lemmings getting the most.

Hermits buying into LIVE for PC

Cows gettign the short end of the stick yet again.

-General_Ram-

lol, yeah Live was so popular on pc that MS had to make it free.

Avatar image for HAZE-Unit
HAZE-Unit

10564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 HAZE-Unit
Member since 2007 • 10564 Posts

And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.Eltroz

The car is way complicated for me because it is sophisticated, I blame the car company for making me stupid for not knowing all of it's features and driving it properly.

Im outdated, I need an outdated car to drive it properly.

Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts
WOW, 360 really is the clear #1 this gen
Avatar image for Arsuz
Arsuz

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Arsuz
Member since 2003 • 2318 Posts

I want to get this but honestly it's taking a back seat to Little Big Planet and Resistance 2. I have a feeling a lot of PS3 owners are feeling the same way. EmperorSupreme

Only first party games sell on the PS3 :wink:

Avatar image for -DrRobotnik-
-DrRobotnik-

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 -DrRobotnik-
Member since 2008 • 5463 Posts
It hasnt sold more than Oblivion, its sold more than Fallout 1 + 2 combined. Hardly a surprise though.
Avatar image for SupergumXP
SupergumXP

189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 SupergumXP
Member since 2003 • 189 Posts

What!?! fallout sold more than fifa!!!

somethings up... heh
also... hate to be the one to bring up digital distribution, but does this include electronic copies?

Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

Didn't Oblivion sell pretty much equally on PC, and 360?

It seems like PC gamers aren't to happy about FO3.

Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

PC - Most people probably pirated it :P

X360 - Great game!

PS3 - Who would want to buy this pathetic excuse for a port. Maybe if Bethesda actually tried, more people would have bought it.

II_Seraphim_II

Pretty much sums it up.

Avatar image for -DrRobotnik-
-DrRobotnik-

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 -DrRobotnik-
Member since 2008 • 5463 Posts

What!?! fallout sold more than fifa!!!

somethings up... heh
also... hate to be the one to bring up digital distribution, but does this include electronic copies?

SupergumXP

How dare you bring it up, im deeply offended!

Avatar image for Bentham
Bentham

1154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Bentham
Member since 2008 • 1154 Posts
This is a very misleading thread. Shame on you.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts

PC version just got pirated a lot.

PS3 version is known for it's bad port. Which you can't blame Sony for considering they OFFER help to developpers. Not to mention Bethesda has developped Oblivion for the PS3.

Which leaves the 360 version obviously in the lead considering it has exclusive content and there's more 360 owners compared to a pirated version of the game or a bad port of it.

So these numbers aren't surprising. People just like to post statistics like these to bait those stupid enough to not realize the obvious.

Avatar image for EuroMafia
EuroMafia

7026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 EuroMafia
Member since 2008 • 7026 Posts

Lol, PC.

PC franchise fails on PC. Oh yeah, no multiplayer so most people pirate. Silly me.

Dunno, this game has great reviews, I might have to check it out.

Avatar image for trick91_basic
trick91_basic

1184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 trick91_basic
Member since 2002 • 1184 Posts
but piracy is effecting 360 too as pc gamers have led us to believe after all the leaks of 360's biggest games?
Avatar image for Planeforger
Planeforger

19604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Planeforger
Member since 2004 • 19604 Posts

PC version just got pirated a lot.

PS3 version is known for it's bad port. Which you can't blame Sony for considering they OFFER help to developpers. Not to mention Bethesda has developped Oblivion for the PS3.

Which leaves the 360 version obviously in the lead considering it has exclusive content and there's more 360 owners compared to a pirated version of the game or a bad port of it.

So these numbers aren't surprising. People just like to post statistics like these to bait those stupid enough to not realize the obvious.

siLVURcross

Actually, the PC version is the second-highest selling game on Steam at the moment - I assume those statistics only track retail sales, so they're going to be wrong.

Oh, and the 360 version was leaked weeks before the game was released, so I guess that I am surprised that it had the best sales.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts

but piracy is effecting 360 too as pc gamers have led us to believe after all the leaks of 360's biggest games?trick91_basic

You're forgetting. On the 360 if you pirate games and get caught. You get DA BAN HAMMERZ from Live. Considering you PAY for Live, I don't think a ban hammer would be a wise choice. (I also believe the ban hammer is IP based?)

But on the PC, it's harder to catch. Not to mention it's easier to work around things like securom and whatnot on the PC.

Avatar image for liquidsnake1987
liquidsnake1987

4750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 liquidsnake1987
Member since 2004 • 4750 Posts
people need to realize that at the time obilvion came out, the 360 was still new on the maket and the ps3 version wasnt out yet. Now more people own both systems, fallout 3 released for every system at the same time, so of course fallout is going to outsell obivion in the first week
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
[QUOTE="siLVURcross"]

PC version just got pirated a lot.

PS3 version is known for it's bad port. Which you can't blame Sony for considering they OFFER help to developpers. Not to mention Bethesda has developped Oblivion for the PS3.

Which leaves the 360 version obviously in the lead considering it has exclusive content and there's more 360 owners compared to a pirated version of the game or a bad port of it.

So these numbers aren't surprising. People just like to post statistics like these to bait those stupid enough to not realize the obvious.

Planeforger

Actually, the PC version is the second-highest selling game on Steam at the moment - I assume those statistics only track retail sales, so they're going to be wrong.

Oh, and the 360 version was leaked weeks before the game was released, so I guess that I am surprised that it had the best sales.

Oh you can buy it on Steam? Guess I wasn't informed enough. In that case I suppose there is a strong amount of sales for the PC, shame pirating is still impending it's domination in sales though.

I'm not really aware of the amount of people that pirate games on the 360 but I'm sure it's a lot less in compared to the PC version. Not to mention Microsoft has an easier time of tracking down people who play pirated games on the 360. Which thus leads to more sales?

I'm not sure, I didn't even bother with this game.

Avatar image for All_that_is_Man
All_that_is_Man

2044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 All_that_is_Man
Member since 2008 • 2044 Posts
Thats what happens when you promise exclusive dlc on one system what do you expect, also the Ps3 version has graphical problems, thats why I got it for the 360 I would of loved to buy it for the ps3 if they would learn how to code better.
Avatar image for pi3m4ster
pi3m4ster

522

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 pi3m4ster
Member since 2008 • 522 Posts
*cough*justablurayplayer*cough* :P
Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#35 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

360 - %55

PS3 - %28

PC - %17

http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/fallout-3-outsells-all-previous-titles-in-the-series-combined

RobWil

That is great news!

I love seeing how great the x360 is doing vs PS3!! :D

Avatar image for WillieBeamish
WillieBeamish

1289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 WillieBeamish
Member since 2008 • 1289 Posts
So Microsoft's console is called MS now? Didn't know about that.:P

I'm not surprised with these numbers. A lot of PS3 owners have skipped Fallout 3 because of all the bad rep that version has. From the experience i've had with the game so far, i say they're missing out big time.

lusitanogamer

Yeah, missing out on the 360 version :P

Avatar image for WillieBeamish
WillieBeamish

1289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 WillieBeamish
Member since 2008 • 1289 Posts

Thats what happens when you promise exclusive dlc on one system what do you expect, also the Ps3 version has graphical problems, thats why I got it for the 360 I would of loved to buy it for the ps3 if they would learn how to code better.All_that_is_Man

Or how about Sony build a system that isn't a joke to program for?

Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#38 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts

Didn't Oblivion sell pretty much equally on PC, and 360?

It seems like PC gamers aren't to happy about FO3.

agentfred
It's been selling pretty well on Steam AFAIK.
Avatar image for Team_Microsoft
Team_Microsoft

198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#39 Team_Microsoft
Member since 2008 • 198 Posts
Even More Proof On Why 360 Owners Are More Loyal to the 360 Brand By Buying lots of Games, Heck no wonder 3rd party Companies are Fighting Over To put there games on the 360!
Avatar image for AlphaGamer469
AlphaGamer469

1881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 AlphaGamer469
Member since 2008 • 1881 Posts

PC version just got pirated a lot.

PS3 version is known for it's bad port. Which you can't blame Sony for considering they OFFER help to developpers. Not to mention Bethesda has developped Oblivion for the PS3.

Which leaves the 360 version obviously in the lead considering it has exclusive content and there's more 360 owners compared to a pirated version of the game or a bad port of it.

So these numbers aren't surprising. People just like to post statistics like these to bait those stupid enough to not realize the obvious.

siLVURcross

Guess Sony didn't offer too much help to the Socom devs either. Face it, the inferior gaming machine got the inferior version. Beth should have just scraped the PS3 version altogether...

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#41 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
[QUOTE="siLVURcross"]

PC version just got pirated a lot.

PS3 version is known for it's bad port. Which you can't blame Sony for considering they OFFER help to developpers. Not to mention Bethesda has developped Oblivion for the PS3.

Which leaves the 360 version obviously in the lead considering it has exclusive content and there's more 360 owners compared to a pirated version of the game or a bad port of it.

So these numbers aren't surprising. People just like to post statistics like these to bait those stupid enough to not realize the obvious.

AlphaGamer469

Guess Sony didn't offer too much help to the Socom devs either. Face it, the inferior gaming machine got the inferior version. Beth should have just scraped the PS3 version altogether...

I haven't heard any bugs or bad visuals with Socom.

I can't see why you're relating to lag time with Sony's machine.

Avatar image for Pro_wrestler
Pro_wrestler

7880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#42 Pro_wrestler
Member since 2002 • 7880 Posts
Most PC gamers that I chat with online have DL'ed this from Steam.
Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts
[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"][QUOTE="siLVURcross"]

PC version just got pirated a lot.

PS3 version is known for it's bad port. Which you can't blame Sony for considering they OFFER help to developpers. Not to mention Bethesda has developped Oblivion for the PS3.

Which leaves the 360 version obviously in the lead considering it has exclusive content and there's more 360 owners compared to a pirated version of the game or a bad port of it.

So these numbers aren't surprising. People just like to post statistics like these to bait those stupid enough to not realize the obvious.

siLVURcross

Guess Sony didn't offer too much help to the Socom devs either. Face it, the inferior gaming machine got the inferior version. Beth should have just scraped the PS3 version altogether...

I haven't heard any bugs or bad visuals with Socom.

I can't see why you're relating to lag time with Sony's machine.

Cause they was to lazy to make a decent online system like Live, so lag/connection issues don't happen. It's all apart of the bad console, bad ports, average games, rubbish online.

Avatar image for All_that_is_Man
All_that_is_Man

2044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 All_that_is_Man
Member since 2008 • 2044 Posts

[QUOTE="All_that_is_Man"]Thats what happens when you promise exclusive dlc on one system what do you expect, also the Ps3 version has graphical problems, thats why I got it for the 360 I would of loved to buy it for the ps3 if they would learn how to code better.WillieBeamish

Or how about Sony build a system that isn't a joke to program for?

So instead of going forward you want me to make things easy for you?

You could go on to pre cal where you know nothing and its harder to learn....or you could stay back and take easy algebra 2..........

move forward if a developer can't figure out how to decently code for new hardware then they have no hope

Avatar image for All_that_is_Man
All_that_is_Man

2044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 All_that_is_Man
Member since 2008 • 2044 Posts
[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"][QUOTE="siLVURcross"]

PC version just got pirated a lot.

PS3 version is known for it's bad port. Which you can't blame Sony for considering they OFFER help to developpers. Not to mention Bethesda has developped Oblivion for the PS3.

Which leaves the 360 version obviously in the lead considering it has exclusive content and there's more 360 owners compared to a pirated version of the game or a bad port of it.

So these numbers aren't surprising. People just like to post statistics like these to bait those stupid enough to not realize the obvious.

CreepyBacon

Guess Sony didn't offer too much help to the Socom devs either. Face it, the inferior gaming machine got the inferior version. Beth should have just scraped the PS3 version altogether...

I haven't heard any bugs or bad visuals with Socom.

I can't see why you're relating to lag time with Sony's machine.

Cause they was to lazy to make a decent online system like Live, so lag/connection issues don't happen. It's all apart of the bad console, bad ports, average games, rubbish online.

Your ignorance is showing, Live is peer to peer and lag does happen, Bad ports are on developers, The ps3 doesn't break as much as the 360 so thats a bad console....The ps3 and 360 both have average games and nothing special.....They have the same online just different features....

So stop talking out of your ass

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.Flamestos

Please what's done is done. If you're going to take on developing a PS3 game now that it's difficulties are common knowledge I expect a developer to put out a quality product or not bother at all Plus Bethesda has PS3 experience this is just a sloppy port.

Take the game as it is or don't take it at all then. Be thankful that you even got the game. Does Bethesda have experience with the PS3? Yes they do but they had 6 monthes to port the game over to PS3. They were not afforded this luxary with Fallout 3.

Avatar image for Flamestos
Flamestos

2487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Flamestos
Member since 2004 • 2487 Posts
[QUOTE="Flamestos"]

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.Blackbond

Please what's done is done. If you're going to take on developing a PS3 game now that it's difficulties are common knowledge I expect a developer to put out a quality product or not bother at all Plus Bethesda has PS3 experience this is just a sloppy port.

Take the game as it is or don't take it at all then. Be thankful that you even got the game. Does Bethesda have experience with the PS3? Yes they do but they had 6 monthes to port the game over to PS3. They were not afforded this luxary with Fallout 3.

That's the reason developers especially this generation of gaming get away with putting out games filled with glitches, bugs and whatever else. Bethesda chose to release the game in that condition period if they needed more time they should've taking it. If I was a PS3 only owner I would just not buy Fallout 3. Good thing I'm not.

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts
[QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Flamestos"]

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.Flamestos

Please what's done is done. If you're going to take on developing a PS3 game now that it's difficulties are common knowledge I expect a developer to put out a quality product or not bother at all Plus Bethesda has PS3 experience this is just a sloppy port.

Take the game as it is or don't take it at all then. Be thankful that you even got the game. Does Bethesda have experience with the PS3? Yes they do but they had 6 monthes to port the game over to PS3. They were not afforded this luxary with Fallout 3.

That's the reason developers especially this generation of gaming get away with putting out games filled with glitches, bugs and whatever else. Bethesda chose to release the game in that condition period if they needed more time they should've taking it. If I was a PS3 only owner I would just not buy Fallout 3. Good thing I'm not.

So you'd be willing to wait an extended period of time after the PC/360 for a PS3 version that is equal to the PC/360 version?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#50 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
[QUOTE="Flamestos"][QUOTE="Blackbond"][QUOTE="Flamestos"]

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]And here they come all the cows complaining about the developer instead of the console. Maybe Sony should not have made a console where the developers have to spend far more money and man hours on then the other systems. Then again cows would never say anything against their messiah the PS3 even if it was the truth.Blackbond

Please what's done is done. If you're going to take on developing a PS3 game now that it's difficulties are common knowledge I expect a developer to put out a quality product or not bother at all Plus Bethesda has PS3 experience this is just a sloppy port.

Take the game as it is or don't take it at all then. Be thankful that you even got the game. Does Bethesda have experience with the PS3? Yes they do but they had 6 monthes to port the game over to PS3. They were not afforded this luxary with Fallout 3.

That's the reason developers especially this generation of gaming get away with putting out games filled with glitches, bugs and whatever else. Bethesda chose to release the game in that condition period if they needed more time they should've taking it. If I was a PS3 only owner I would just not buy Fallout 3. Good thing I'm not.

So you'd be willing to wait an extended period of time after the PC/360 for a PS3 version that is equal to the PC/360 version?

Patience is a virtue. So why not? If the game only gets better with the given time then why not.