Crysis 2 - Ps3, 360 & PC Comparison "Video"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtHAPJulgh0

By far the best looking multiplat and most certainly on par with exclusives. Even on par with pc except res and a few effects.

bigger pics @ robbaz.com

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

chikenfriedrice

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

Mystic-G

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

chikenfriedrice

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

G-O-M-J

yes see above

[QUOTE="G-O-M-J"][QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

chikenfriedrice

yes see above

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

chikenfriedrice

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

[QUOTE="G-O-M-J"]You have proof of this? :sG-O-M-J

yes see above

It doesn't look better than Crysis or Warhead how do you exlpain this

Looks like a console port.MFDOOM1983

[QUOTE="G-O-M-J"][QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

yes see above

chikenfriedrice

It doesn't look better than Crysis or Warhead how do you exlpain this

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

[QUOTE="G-O-M-J"]Holding back the pc version specificly so it doesnt outshine the console versions sounds rather silly if you ask me..G-O-M-J

It doesn't look better than Crysis or Warhead how do you exlpain this

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

[QUOTE="G-O-M-J"]Holding back the pc version specificly so it doesnt outshine the console versions sounds rather silly if you ask me..G-O-M-J

It doesn't look better than Crysis or Warhead how do you exlpain this

Warhead came out a year after Crysis and looked better...4 years should be enough time but I am not a dev

PS3 looks extremely close to 360 imo. 360 just has a bit better lighting is all. Not the huge difference some claim. What about the MP however? PS3's demo was buttcrack.

wow this is better than Uncharted 2 and Killzone 3 :shock: Beautiful game, just wish they would have added a few PC exlusive effects...didn't they know that would make us PC gamers happy? They are technological wizards afterall, it probably would have only taken a few months to add some nicer effects to the PC version for allthe people who have powerful PCs now :(

great gameplay though :D

[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Looks like a console port.GeneralShowzer

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Looks like a console port.h575309

Looks like a console port.MFDOOM1983

It does look like a shoddy console port, especially with all the fake 'walls' that funnel you from area A -> area B.

With DX11 it will no doubt look incredible, but graphics are the least of my concern, the real issue is the gimping of the gameplay so its now a straight shooter down 'corridors'.

Tacked on DX 11.....100 FPS difference.

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]Looks like a console port.h575309

Kinda off topic but what's the point of these "hit something to continue" screens, don't get it. ME1 didn't have it, ME2 press a button to continue, the same with DA:O not having it while DA2 did. Is this some kind of new pointless trend? I mean seriously, what's the freaking point of it. I started the game, of course I want to continue.

[QUOTE="h575309"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] "Press Start to Continue"GeneralShowzer

It does look like a shoddy console port, especially with all the fake 'walls' that funnel you from area A -> area B.

With DX11 it will no doubt look incredible, but graphics are the least of my concern, the real issue is the gimping of the gameplay so its now a straight shooter down 'corridors'.

haberman13

You quite obviously havent played it.

This is supposed to look better than killzone 3? it doesnt even match up to alan wake pssshhh

Tacked on DX 11.....100 FPS difference.

GeneralShowzer

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

Tacked on DX 11.....100 FPS difference.

Vaasman

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

Tacked on DX 11.....100 FPS difference.

GeneralShowzer

Not sure why lemmings are saying the 360 version is better.

PS3 version has no tears while the 360 does, however the 360 version can keep the fps locked at 30.

PC>360=PS3

Not sure why lemmings are saying the 360 version is better.

PS3 version has no tears while the 360 does, however the 360 version can keep the fps locked at 30.

PC>360=PS3

SwagSurf

Not sure why lemmings are saying the 360 version is better.

PS3 version has no tears while the 360 does, however the 360 version can keep the fps locked at 30.

PC>360=PS3

SwagSurf

I wouldn't worry about it, lemmings and cows will fight over a 2 pixel difference on the one hand, yet on the other a PC game running at twice the rez and framrate will be called 'exactly the same as the (insert console here) version.'

Utterly pathetic, they have access to 2010/11 hardware; and yet it barely looks better than the console version. Performance could also be considerably better, given that they stripped it down into a slightly upgraded console port.

Crytek has severely damaged their reputation as a PC hardware pushing developer.

This is supposed to look better than killzone 3? it doesnt even match up to alan wake pssshhh

Zaibach

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

Mystic-G

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

savagetwinkie

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

savagetwinkie

Trumps Crysis 1? :|

considering my gtx 470 plays it pretty decently on extreme @ 720p i think they didn't hold back as much as people would hope, its a gorgeous game, completely trumps crysis 1, in visuals and performance.savagetwinkie

You know... I would have thought the people who were constantly in denial about it being a barely enhanced console port; would have finally seen reason when the game came out. When it was out there for everyone to test, and they could no longer use "not out yet" as a excuse to reject all available material for judging the game.

But I'm looking at this post, and I can see this headache is going to last a while longer... Even when we are looking at a video, showing the PC version offers barely noticable visual differences over the console versions (and yet still needs a 460 to max somehow), people are still trying to spin it's not a disappointment on PC.

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="Mystic-G"] It's funny how many PC gamers still had much hope in Crytek when they were developing CE3. I knew they would hold back the moment they said they were going to consoles. I don't blame consoles though, the developers are the ones to blame. SwagSurf

Trumps Crysis 1? :|

crysis 2 is so perty, its the first game that made me happy for spending 1200 on a pcsavagetwinkie

Oh, he's not serious, never mind.

[QUOTE="SwagSurf"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] considering my gtx 470 plays it pretty decently on extreme @ 720p i think they didn't hold back as much as people would hope, its a gorgeous game, completely trumps crysis 1, in visuals and performance.savagetwinkie

Trumps Crysis 1? :|

Play Crysis 1 and you'll see why C2 looks like a big downgrade. Here check this out

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nD1VM6ML57w&hd=1

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]considering my gtx 470 plays it pretty decently on extreme @ 720p i think they didn't hold back as much as people would hope, its a gorgeous game, completely trumps crysis 1, in visuals and performance.AnnoyedDragon

You know... I would have thought the people who were constantly in denial about it being a barely enhanced console port; would have finally seen reason when the game came out. When it was out there for everyone to test, and they could no longer use "not out yet" as a excuse to reject all available material for judging the game.

But I'm looking at this post, and I can see this headache is going to last a while longer... Even when we are looking at a video, showing the PC version offers barely noticable visual differences over the console versions (and yet still needs a 460 to max somehow), people are still trying to spin it's not a disappointment on PC.

That was actually a really good comparison video.

The game looks good. The PC version looks noticably better to me. But the console versions are really up there. The two look fairly close, but I prefer the lighting on the Xbox 360 version. I'm just glad the game didn't end up as bad as demos and betas pointed out to people.

There was talk that the PS3 version was unfinished going around due to a bad demo or something, but it looks like the final product speaks for itself. It doesn't look as cool as the original, but it still looks like a fun shooter. I'll be sure to pick it up when the price drops a bit.

[QUOTE="SwagSurf"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] considering my gtx 470 plays it pretty decently on extreme @ 720p i think they didn't hold back as much as people would hope, its a gorgeous game, completely trumps crysis 1, in visuals and performance.savagetwinkie

Trumps Crysis 1? :|

You should be playing Just Cause 2, Shattered Horizons, Metro 2033, and Crysis 1. Especially Metro and Crysis 1. Mods are what makes Crysis 1 absolutely beastly.

I play on extreme at 1152p with a GTX 260. You should increase the res :P

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"][QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

It looks good on consoles but this just proves that Crytek held back on the PC version to not outshine the console versions

savagetwinkie

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]considering my gtx 470 plays it pretty decently on extreme @ 720p i think they didn't hold back as much as people would hope, its a gorgeous game, completely trumps crysis 1, in visuals and performance.AnnoyedDragon

You know... I would have thought the people who were constantly in denial about it being a barely enhanced console port; would have finally seen reason when the game came out. When it was out there for everyone to test, and they could no longer use "not out yet" as a excuse to reject all available material for judging the game.

But I'm looking at this post, and I can see this headache is going to last a while longer... Even when we are looking at a video, showing the PC version offers barely noticable visual differences over the console versions (and yet still needs a 460 to max somehow), people are still trying to spin it's not a disappointment on PC.

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="SwagSurf"]

Trumps Crysis 1? :|

SwagSurf

Play Crysis 1 and you'll see why C2 looks like a big downgrade. Here check this out

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nD1VM6ML57w&hd=1