Are you freaking kidding me!?!!!!!!

  • 72 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for sinseers
sinseers

318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 sinseers
Member since 2003 • 318 Posts

MODERN WARFARE 2?!? Did I miss something? Wasn't Modern Warfare Call of Duty 4? No wonder kids are so mixed up these days. Some of us adults can't even get simple our math right. I can't believe no one has spoken on this yet. Are you guys OK with this?

Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts

It's Call of Duty 4...Modern Warfare...2...Yea,sounds dull.

Avatar image for 110million
110million

14910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 110million
Member since 2008 • 14910 Posts
Its like the Rambo movies all over again. :? I guess at least they took the number off Call of Duty... Call of Duty 6: Modern Warfare 2 would be so messed up.. its still pretty messed up with just modern warfare 2..
Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts

MODERN WARFARE 2?!? Did I miss something? Wasn't Modern Warfare Call of Duty 4? No wonder kids are so mixed up these days. Some of us adults can't even get simple our math right. I can't believe no one has spoken on this yet. Are you guys OK with this?

sinseers

lol it was called Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, I'm pretty sure the reason they changed it from numbers to subtitles IE Call of Duty: World at War is that they didn't want to end up having Call of Duty 17: Nuclear Warfare, so now they've taken this new approach in titling the games. So that's how we're at Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2.

Avatar image for wayne_kar
wayne_kar

2090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 wayne_kar
Member since 2009 • 2090 Posts
yeah. i let game titles bother me too
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Stop buying these games, people.
Avatar image for Gh0st_Of_0nyx
Gh0st_Of_0nyx

8992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Gh0st_Of_0nyx
Member since 2007 • 8992 Posts
So the acronym is CoD4:MW2 :P
Avatar image for wayne_kar
wayne_kar

2090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 wayne_kar
Member since 2009 • 2090 Posts
Stop buying these games, people.Jandurin
what. even if you like them.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"]Stop buying these games, people.wayne_kar
what. even if you like them.

Stop liking them :x
Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
Stop buying these games, people.Jandurin
As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#11 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
They started using subtitles to distinguish non-Infinity Ward CoD games. TBH, I would prefer if IW was the only CoD developer, but whatever they want to call the games are not going to bother me.
Avatar image for Gh0st_Of_0nyx
Gh0st_Of_0nyx

8992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Gh0st_Of_0nyx
Member since 2007 • 8992 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"]Stop buying these games, people.mmirza23
As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games

So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?
Avatar image for wayne_kar
wayne_kar

2090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 wayne_kar
Member since 2009 • 2090 Posts
[QUOTE="wayne_kar"][QUOTE="Jandurin"]Stop buying these games, people.Jandurin
what. even if you like them.

Stop liking them :x

no
Avatar image for JonnyEarthquake
JonnyEarthquake

770

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#14 JonnyEarthquake
Member since 2007 • 770 Posts

I guess we`ll see World in War 2 as well then.

Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts

[QUOTE="mmirza23"][QUOTE="Jandurin"]Stop buying these games, people.Gh0st_Of_0nyx
As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games

So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?

We had other wars lol. WW1, Vietnam, Korea,Civil and Revolutionary(not sure if a COD game would work well there) but WW2 is just so played out IMO. They could even do something futuristic like GRAW.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="mmirza23"][QUOTE="Jandurin"]Stop buying these games, people.Gh0st_Of_0nyx
As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games

So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?

If they keep producing games of quality gameplay and story (and IW has yet to let me down), they could set the game anywhere and I would not care.
Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#17 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts

It's Call of Duty 4...Modern Warfare...2...Yea,sounds dull.

Lto_thaG
Up there with Rainbow 6 vegas 2.
Avatar image for wayne_kar
wayne_kar

2090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 wayne_kar
Member since 2009 • 2090 Posts
[QUOTE="mmirza23"][QUOTE="Jandurin"]Stop buying these games, people.Gh0st_Of_0nyx
As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games

So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?

they've only done 1. its hardly stagnant. my friends list on live is still dominated by CoD4 people love the game.
Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="mmirza23"] As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games mmirza23

So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?

We had other wars lol. WW1, Vietnam, Korea,Civil and Revolutionary(not sure if a COD game would work well there) but WW2 is just so played out IMO. They could even do something futuristic like GRAW.

I don't see why they have to be American wars either. COD4 had you playing mostly as the British, which made a nice change. Maybe that's cause i am British though but i wouldn't mind playing as a foreign character.

Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="mmirza23"] As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games SpruceCaboose
So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?

If they keep producing games of quality gameplay and story (and IW has yet to let me down), they could set the game anywhere and I would not care.

Ah yes that as well, if IW isn't developing it, I don't want it.
Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
[QUOTE="CreepyBacon"]

[QUOTE="mmirza23"]

So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?Gh0st_Of_0nyx

We had other wars lol. WW1, Vietnam, Korea,Civil and Revolutionary(not sure if a COD game would work well there) but WW2 is just so played out IMO. They could even do something futuristic like GRAW.

I don't see why they have to be American wars either. COD4 had you playing mostly as the British, which made a nice change. Maybe that's cause i am British though but i wouldn't mind playing as a foreign character.

Yeah I agree but aside from WW1, WW2 and the recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, British really haven't been in wars where COD hasn't already used the setting. Back when the British Empire was a force, I dont think can really be used as a COD setting haha. Also with Call of Duty I really doubt they'll have you playing as the "evil" side.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="mmirza23"] As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games mmirza23

So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?

We had other wars lol. WW1, Vietnam, Korea,Civil and Revolutionary(not sure if a COD game would work well there) but WW2 is just so played out IMO. They could even do something futuristic like GRAW.

WWI- Woo, trench warfare... Vietnam- The only real massive battle that didn't involve thick jungle was the Tet Offensive Korea- Essentially a oeninsula version of the Pacific Theatre, complete with virtually the same weaponry (give or take an F-86 Sabre) Civil War- Watch Glory and tell me how that'd be in video game form Revolutiony- Again, musket firing-line combat SUCKS for video games
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

It's Call of Duty 4...Modern Warfare...2...Yea,sounds dull.

killerfist

Up there with Rainbow 6 vegas 2.

But Raindbow 6 has always been Rainbow 6. It is really completely different :|

Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts

[QUOTE="killerfist"][QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

It's Call of Duty 4...Modern Warfare...2...Yea,sounds dull.

spinecaton

Up there with Rainbow 6 vegas 2.

But Raindbow 6 has always been Rainbow 6. It is really completely different :|

Sounds the same to me. :P Just as lame.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="killerfist"] Up there with Rainbow 6 vegas 2. killerfist

But Raindbow 6 has always been Rainbow 6. It is really completely different :|

Sounds the same to me. :P Just as lame.

Me too.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
They want to keep the franchise ****Fresh**** By naming it Modern Warfare 2, it essentially makes it seem like a sequel... rather than the ***Sixth*** in the series. Kinda like MS naming the 360, instead of the Xbox 2 - rather than having the Xbox 2 against the PS3..... Different context but same principle really. Still, i dont really care much. No COD has bested COD1, quite frankly.
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

[QUOTE="killerfist"][QUOTE="spinecaton"]

But Raindbow 6 has always been Rainbow 6. It is really completely different :|

Jandurin

Sounds the same to me. :P Just as lame.

Me too.

What about Rainbow Six 3?

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"][QUOTE="mmirza23"] As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games mmirza23

So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?

We had other wars lol. WW1, Vietnam, Korea,Civil and Revolutionary(not sure if a COD game would work well there) but WW2 is just so played out IMO. They could even do something futuristic like GRAW.

WWII is only partially played out, there are no games that i know of covering the Japanese invasion of China, you could even have an altinate history where the Japanese invade the US or the nuclear bombs are never dropped so it goes into a land offensive. I think the cold war should be explored more IMO
Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#29 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="killerfist"] Sounds the same to me. :P Just as lame. spinecaton

Me too.

What about Rainbow Six 3?

:lol: that's even worse.
Avatar image for CoreoVII
CoreoVII

1838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#30 CoreoVII
Member since 2007 • 1838 Posts

Letdown. I thought this game was going to be something innovative......lame.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="killerfist"] Sounds the same to me. :P Just as lame. spinecaton

Me too.

What about Rainbow Six 3?

That will also produce lols.
Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts
[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"] Me too.killerfist

What about Rainbow Six 3?

:lol: that's even worse.

Names are killing my braincells off.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
I don't know why no one has compared this to GTA?
Avatar image for deactivated-57f6810aefea1
deactivated-57f6810aefea1

497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 deactivated-57f6810aefea1
Member since 2009 • 497 Posts

what about Final Fantasy X:2?

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="mmirza23"]

[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"] So they should stay stagnant in this modern setting until you eventually get bored with it ?Verge_6

We had other wars lol. WW1, Vietnam, Korea,Civil and Revolutionary(not sure if a COD game would work well there) but WW2 is just so played out IMO. They could even do something futuristic like GRAW.

WWI- Woo, trench warfare... Vietnam- The only real massive battle that didn't involve thick jungle was the Tet Offensive Korea- Essentially a oeninsula version of the Pacific Theatre, complete with virtually the same weaponry (give or take an F-86 Sabre) Civil War- Watch Glory and tell me how that'd be in video game form Revolutiony- Again, musket firing-line combat SUCKS for video games

Honestly I think WW1 would be interesting.... It depends on its core design and execution. Make it more survival based... however incorporate heavy melee focus as well as shooting. Stuff like sticking to the ground crawling through no mans land (in an operation flashpoint sense) would be thrilling, as would night raids with mellee weapons. Very voilent... but from an entertainment perspective it could be good.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="killerfist"] Sounds the same to me. :P Just as lame. spinecaton

Me too.

What about Rainbow Six 3?

There is a Rainbow Six 3

http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/0/28/11001-Rainbow%20Six%203%20Raven%20Shield%20Cover_super.jpg

Oh wait, you mean THAT series.

That ain't Rainbow Six, despite the title. :P

You can brand Pepsi as Coke and its still going to be different regardless.

Vegas the true bastard child that doesn't know what it wants to be.

/rant

:P

Avatar image for sinseers
sinseers

318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 sinseers
Member since 2003 • 318 Posts
[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="killerfist"] Up there with Rainbow 6 vegas 2. killerfist

But Raindbow 6 has always been Rainbow 6. It is really completely different :|

Sounds the same to me. :P No...i think you missed the point. I was mainly speaking on continuity and chronology with title names for games. For example, why in the hell is the prequel to DMC called DMC 3? Or how bout this one. You do know that technically Soulcalibur 2, 3 and 4 is really Soul Edge 3, 4 and 5, but no one is man enough to call Namco out it because the games are good. Poo that! Give me some consistency so I proudly display my library without having to explain why it appears to be out of order when it actually isn't. Just as lame.

Avatar image for sinseers
sinseers

318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 sinseers
Member since 2003 • 318 Posts

what about Final Fantasy X:2?

Bunj84
More fuel for the fire as far as I'm concerned. For devs and pubs, some people sure do have some funny math and grammar skills.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
[QUOTE="wayne_kar"][QUOTE="Jandurin"]Stop buying these games, people.Jandurin
what. even if you like them.

Stop liking them :x

lol
Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#41 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts
[QUOTE="sinseers"] No...i think you missed the point. I was mainly speaking on continuity and chronology with title names for games. For example, why in the hell is the prequel to DMC called DMC 3? Or how bout this one. You do know that technically Soulcalibur 2, 3 and 4 is really Soul Edge 3, 4 and 5, but no one is man enough to call Namco out it because the games are good. Poo that! Give me some consistency so I proudly display my library without having to explain why it appears to be out of order when it actually isn't.

I see. Well, blame Treyarch! They're the ones that started it with World at War. That should've been 5 and this 6. :P
Avatar image for tOtalPWNaAe
tOtalPWNaAe

3375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 tOtalPWNaAe
Member since 2008 • 3375 Posts
I kid you not:x
Avatar image for RK-Mara
RK-Mara

11489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#43 RK-Mara
Member since 2006 • 11489 Posts
Was WaW CoD5 and is this CoD6 or CoD4:2?
Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts

Was WaW CoD5 and is this CoD6 or CoD4:2?RK-Mara
They essentially killed the numbers, now it's called Call of Duty: Enter Subtitle here, I think they didn't want a final fantasy fiasco on their hands, I mean honestly Call of Duty 13 wouldn't sound that appealing a title. However technically speaking WAW is 5 and CODMW2 is 6

Avatar image for jwsoul
jwsoul

5468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 jwsoul
Member since 2005 • 5468 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"]Stop buying these games, people.mmirza23
As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games

Shame they dont go for WW1 or perhaps the 18th Century wars, or how about some Modern day special forces operations?
Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
It's not even CoD6 as there were uncounted console outings prior to CoD2 but after CoD1
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="mmirza23"][QUOTE="Jandurin"]Stop buying these games, people.jwsoul
As long as they don't go back to WW2, I will keep buying COD games

Shame they dont go for WW1 or perhaps the 18th Century wars, or how about some Modern day special forces operations?

Already addressed in a prior post, and CoD4 practically revolved around the SAS who did SF operations in Russia, remember?
Avatar image for speedsix
speedsix

1076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 speedsix
Member since 2003 • 1076 Posts

[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"] Me too.Jandurin

What about Rainbow Six 3?

That will also produce lols.

The 6 part isn't a game iteration, Rainbow 6 is the name of the team in the game iirc

Avatar image for thepwninator
thepwninator

8134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#49 thepwninator
Member since 2006 • 8134 Posts
Stop buying these games, people.Jandurin
Indeed. Or, at least, stop buying them until they actually make a futuristic-ish game that actually has intriguing weapons and other intriguing gameplay mechanics.
Avatar image for def_mode
def_mode

4237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 def_mode
Member since 2005 • 4237 Posts
[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]

It's Call of Duty 4...Modern Warfare...2...Yea,sounds dull.

killerfist
Up there with Rainbow 6 vegas 2.

the 6 in Rainbow 6 is part of the name. it dont mean the number of installation of the game. just like army of 2