PSP Slim or PSP (Fat): which is better?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for xerosystem
xerosystem

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 xerosystem
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

So which is better? In terms of the battery life, how comfortable it is to hold the thing for a long time and its durability.

Avatar image for ZombiePandaPuff
ZombiePandaPuff

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 ZombiePandaPuff
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
I personally perfer the Slim. I don't know how the battery life compares. But I think the slims more comfortable to hold, and the game disc cover doesnt go flying open on the slim you just open it on the fat one you press the button and it goes flying open. It might be just me but I think it doing that for a long time might mess it up the cover that is. Ok sorry im strecthing this out. Does anyone know how the battery life compares? I don't think theres a difference
Avatar image for Yorro
Yorro

715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#3 Yorro
Member since 2007 • 715 Posts

SLIM's Advantages

TV-out - watch tv, whooo!.
More Ram - faster loading times
Battery Capacity - longer battery life
Better Controls - DPad is slightly higher
Lighter - ofcourse it won't strain your wrist
Skype - PSP phone
Sounds better - Speakers have been moved
Go Messenger - internet chat
Update Reliability - better chance of new firmware compatibility
Newer Accessories - also has a better chance of new accessory compatibility

PHAT's Advantages

More Durable - if you like using it as a hammer
Solid Memory - memory looks(just visually) less flimsy
Cheaper - ofcourse its cheap, its old.
Nothing else - And basically the opposite of what Slim has

Avatar image for better-than-U
better-than-U

417

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 better-than-U
Member since 2008 • 417 Posts
i got a psp "fat" 1 month after release and a slim 2 years after and i dont play either of them so i dont know really .... but the slim is delicate,but faster and the fat is heacier slower and the power button is in the wrong place
Avatar image for danny5329
danny5329

954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 danny5329
Member since 2005 • 954 Posts
Of course it's the slim, it doubles the loading time of the phat.
Avatar image for woonsa
woonsa

6322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 woonsa
Member since 2008 • 6322 Posts
they wouldn't really release a worse psp so... of course slim is better:roll:
Avatar image for pspaddict0077
pspaddict0077

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 pspaddict0077
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
though i dont get it....the iTouch is sooooo much smaller yet it has an amazing 128MB of RAM....so y is the psp stuck at 64MB.....it really has to do better to keep up with portable gadgets....
Avatar image for canesfan8193
canesfan8193

477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 canesfan8193
Member since 2007 • 477 Posts
Slim is way better.
Avatar image for Mormaso
Mormaso

874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 Mormaso
Member since 2005 • 874 Posts
slim slim slim slim slim
Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts
The Slim is far superior.
Avatar image for xero_33
xero_33

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 xero_33
Member since 2004 • 171 Posts
slim is good.. more features.. longer battery life... tv output.. skype.... more ram, 64 (32 with phat)... better loading times...
Avatar image for iva_vkt
iva_vkt

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 iva_vkt
Member since 2008 • 29 Posts
looks like slim wins in every condicion :)
Avatar image for T-Machine99
T-Machine99

1848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 T-Machine99
Member since 2007 • 1848 Posts
The slim is better. It feels just right in yout hands.
Avatar image for xero_33
xero_33

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 xero_33
Member since 2004 • 171 Posts
just like what they all said... why go for the old one aynways... its not like getting an OS like going for WInXP over WinVista... heheh.. i would go for XP.. but i would like to own a Slim too.. but im still enjoying my old psp...
Avatar image for HashBrownie89
HashBrownie89

86

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 HashBrownie89
Member since 2008 • 86 Posts
How durable is the slim? I know my phat has taken some hits and is still goin strong. Is the slim the same way?
Avatar image for OnStar47
OnStar47

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 OnStar47
Member since 2008 • 157 Posts
slim is obiously better...but i still have a phat one (yeah thats right, PHAT)
Avatar image for xero_33
xero_33

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 xero_33
Member since 2004 • 171 Posts
How durable is the slim? I know my phat has taken some hits and is still goin strong. Is the slim the same way?HashBrownie89
Its similar to asking the question, how hard are the hits the psp willl be taking.. its all about taking good care of it.. i had some minor bumps on my psp (phat), that would include dropping it from my 2 ft tall bed.. ... its 3 years old and it still works like its just came out of the box.. but i think it should be as strong as the previous one...
Avatar image for kashim26
kashim26

929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 kashim26
Member since 2005 • 929 Posts
The metal chassis has been removed from the slim to make it lighter/slimmer so it will obviously be less durable then the phat.
Avatar image for xero_33
xero_33

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 xero_33
Member since 2004 • 171 Posts
The metal chassis has been removed from the slim to make it lighter/slimmer so it will obviously be less durable then the phat.kashim26
i guess he just really need to take care good of it...
Avatar image for smoresvscoco
smoresvscoco

296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#20 smoresvscoco
Member since 2007 • 296 Posts
The slim is obviously better
Avatar image for All-Star-Gamble
All-Star-Gamble

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 All-Star-Gamble
Member since 2008 • 143 Posts
The PSP "Slim" is actually better, but I dont know why I just like the feel of the PSP Fat, its a PSP so they're both great!
Avatar image for Talldude80
Talldude80

6321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#22 Talldude80
Member since 2003 • 6321 Posts
Ive played the fat ones at stores, but i bought a slim like 2 months ago. so far its pretty nice. it does feel slightly flimsy though, but its sooo light. The only thing i wish they had done was have louder speakers and maybe they could have made the battery cover more sturdy feeling. but really, the slim psp is the best handheld yet.
Avatar image for asakoh123
asakoh123

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 asakoh123
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
i choose PSP pHat (FAT) because... for me... the date released does not matter... the important thing is that you enjoy playing it ,even i did not owned a PSP 2001(slim) i asked my friends who have PSP SLIM and... 7 out of 8 said pHat is BETTER their reasons why did they say that pHat is BETTER are.... -1.) somehow pHat is More COMFORTABLE. -2.) Batteries are more ORIGINALY DESIGNED. -3.) Aperantly less destructable. -4.) Lot more CHEAPER -5.) MODS in pHat has HIGHER numbers than slim. -6.) sometimes pHat has LONGER battery. - and lastly... -7.) THIS IS WHERE PSPs STARTED FROM THE BEGINNING...IT IS WHERE WE ALL STARTED DISCOVERING PSPs~!!! by Asakoh
Avatar image for XXI_World
XXI_World

2050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#24 XXI_World
Member since 2008 • 2050 Posts

i choose PSP pHat (FAT) because... for me... the date released does not matter... the important thing is that you enjoy playing it ,even i did not owned a PSP 2001(slim) i asked my friends who have PSP SLIM and... 7 out of 8 said pHat is BETTER their reasons why did they say that pHat is BETTER are....
-1.) somehow pHat is More COMFORTABLE.
-2.) Batteries are more ORIGINALY DESIGNED.
-3.) Aperantly less destructable.
-4.) Lot more CHEAPER
-5.) MODS in pHat has HIGHER numbers than slim.
-6.) sometimes pHat has LONGER battery. - and lastly...
-7.) THIS IS WHERE PSPs STARTED FROM THE BEGINNING...IT IS WHERE WE ALL STARTED DISCOVERING PSPs~!!! by Asakohasakoh123


1. 2000s are more comfortable than 1000s because they're lighter, has improved D-pad and face buttons, analog is better designed.
2. What do you mean by batteries are more originally designed? Whatever you're trying to say, it's obvious that 2000's battery life is better than 1000's.
3. Yes, but they're heavier and not as portableas the 2000.
4. Okay.
5. Okay.
6. Wut?
7. Okay...?

Plus, your weird choice of capitalization makes me dizzy.

Avatar image for jasontdoto
jasontdoto

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 jasontdoto
Member since 2005 • 510 Posts

plus this is another zombie thread that got revived for no apparent reason and should be locked. OP date May 17th 2008.