World in conflict will be hardware eater!!!

fps going down in demo...but other new games play good on my comp?

amd64 4000 single core

epox limited edition nforce4

kingmax 1 gb ddr400

gainward 7600 gt 256mb with zalman

i always use 1600x1050 because it will be wrong to play low settings on 22 inch monitor...8)

everything is distorted in lower settings

i upgraded my comp year ago...will go for duo core but...ram ddr400 does not support am2 slot and i cant rid off my old ram...

cant sell it::

According to the in-game test, I get an average of 23 fps maxed DX10, but fraps tells me I average in the 30's.

ok you are right, but in rts...the bigger res, you see morestuff on the field....that may be crucial for a strategy,if ya are a rts maniac...ill try with less antistopic

bioshock, stalker, medieval 2 play good fps on this res...;)

i always use 1600x1050 because it will be wrong to play low settings on 22 inch monitor...8)

everything is distorted in lower settings

gfile

Believe it or not but in some games i have better fps in 1600x1050 then lower res:::

some strange PC:question:

Believe it or not but in some games i have better fps in 1600x1050 then lower res:::

gfile

with all the settings cranked, it brings my PC to its knees. (specs in sig)

Believe it or not but in some games i have better fps in 1600x1050 then lower res:::

some strange PC:question:

gfile

I'm sure they haven't even began to optimize the software yet.

fps going down in demo...but other new games play good on my comp?

amd64 4000 single core

epox limited edition nforce4

kingmax 1 gb ddr400

gainward 7600 gt 256mb with zalman

gfile

i always use 1600x1050 because it will be wrong to play low settings on 22 inch monitor...8)

everything is distorted in lower settings

gfile

Well, your monitor doesn't determine whether or not you can play at high settings, your PC does. And with your specs (especially the single core processor and only 1 gig of ram) don't support running it on high settings.

This game doesn't really seem optimized, my pc's a Pentium D 2.8GHz (OC@ 3.4GHz) 2GB RAM, 8600GTS. The game runs veryyy good on 1360X768 on medium settings. But once I crank it up tp High or Very High, I get horrible lag. So if it's ran higher than medium no matter what res i got it on it completely lags. Anyways, I'll still be getting this great game because I can run it in 1360X768 on medium graphical settings. The 1360X768 is my monitors native res.gamer082009

Well the GFX and CPU aren't THAT great.

Anyway I run it max on DX9 @ 1280x1024 with everything full ... AA, AF, Shadows, Everything.

I have a X-2 4800+ and 256mb 7800gtx and 2gb ram.

I was in the beta, too.

It fried my GPU, artefacts all over the place, colored dots on the desktop etc :(

I first put the stettings to low, and then added stuff to graphics, see how well it still works. Now the settings are almost back to medium, and works almost as fine as with low. Big battles do however make the game lag some.

It was very smooth at 1680x1050 with all settings high.

The only moment it gave me about 17 FPS was when you look very closely, (and try to rotate around) the biggest explosion effect. I can't really recall the name of the strike you call down. it drop two bombs I believe and the effect is massively large.

It's a demo, I'm positive there will be some optimization done prior to release, or a few fixes in patches.

The game does offer a tremendous field of view with many excellent looking environment effect, from simple buildings to every vehicle.

When you count all the massacre going on and calling of air strikes, the game feels very epic.

Plus, if you put 2-3 options to medium for example, you won't even see any difference in game visuals, but you will get higher frames.

I've only played the beta on my old computer and it worked fine. I played it on a p4 3.0ghz, 1gb ram, 6800LE on kinda low settings but it still looked pretty good so I can't see why it didn't work good on your computer.ikwal

Same, and on my new PC the game runs like a dream. I think its fairly well optimized, especially considering how great it looks.

I have to know, what is it you are seeing in this game? I played the beta and that lasted all of about an hour. I mean the sounds were muted, your 'soldiers' are just little splashes of color the infantry is so darn tiny. The combat itself was boring and uninspired....people will really pay 50 bucks for this??silunt

PC Format UK gave Wic 90/100

Game Informer gave Wic 92,5%

Swedish PC Gamer gave Wic 93%

Duno what's wrong with you...

my system can run it fine on medium/high setting

amd 64 3200+

1gig of ram

7900 gtx 512 mb