SuperPI Benchmark thread, How fast is your CPU?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
4M in 1:28
Though it's not really a fair comparison, since I ran it under Linux. :P
i got 2:45 with my c2d 6300HAHA!!!!!!! i got 2:44 with my Core 2 Duo E4300!!!! :P [QUOTE="Makari"]2:31 on the opty 165 @ 2.8, but i didn't shut down the background programs.. i remember some of the other things you could do to get SP times down were to switch to basic themes on an athlon and to change windows' memory management to the best performance for 'system cache.' it's also pretty sensitive to RAM timings, iirc.
some_canadian
Its amazing how the Intel Core 2 Duo's are actually much better... My C2D E4300 is only @1.8GHZ stock and yet its only 13 seconds behind your Opteron 2.8GHZ. pretty impressive stuff..cant wait to overclock my bad boy..
[QUOTE="some_canadian"]i got 2:45 with my c2d 6300HAHA!!!!!!! i got 2:44 with my Core 2 Duo E4300!!!! :P [QUOTE="Makari"]2:31 on the opty 165 @ 2.8, but i didn't shut down the background programs.. i remember some of the other things you could do to get SP times down were to switch to basic themes on an athlon and to change windows' memory management to the best performance for 'system cache.' it's also pretty sensitive to RAM timings, iirc.
kato_
Its amazing how the Intel Core 2 Duo's are actually much better... My C2D E4300 is only @1.8GHZ stock and yet its only 13 seconds behind your Opteron 2.8GHZ. pretty impressive stuff..cant wait to overclock my bad boy.. yeah, they do extremely well at number-crunching, though the difference isn't there in games. the sandra processor arithmetic benchmark's even more out of whack. :)
1.47 qx6700 oc 3.4 ghzDude, how come my test is a tiny bit faster than yours. That CPU should be owning mine. :S
EDIT: didnt know i bumped this...
Jiggly_Wiggly
[QUOTE="Jiggly_Wiggly"]1.47 qx6700 oc 3.4 ghzDude, how come my test is a tiny bit faster than yours. That CPU should be owning mine. :S
EDIT: didnt know i bumped this...
Wartzay
look at all thoes programs he was running at the time..and yet he still manages to beat about 98% of the people here. lol
k, I just reran the test three times.
1:49 with a ton of windows open + unraring a 2GB file.
2:08 with a ton of windows open and converting a 2gig Fraps file to a 190mb AVI.
1:56 with a few windows open and Intel Tempurature Analysis Tool running at 100% workload.
My point is that he should be getting better times just because his OC is 400mhz faster than mine. Thats ignoring 2 more cores, 6mb more cache, etc. Hes at 1:47 while basically doing nothing, he should be more like 1:20 or less.
I dont get it.
Â
4M test with no applications running. My fastest time is actually about 10secs quicker which was the first time I ran the test (4M from system being on all day)...
The following tests were done from boot up.
The following test is 4M whilst encoding LOST Volume 6 (epsisodes 21-24) with AutoGK/VirtualDubmod etc. I did the PI test after the Subtitle program had encoded the subs i.e while it was encoding actual video. I used 8xxMB quality, although I don't know how that would effect the performance.
All I know is that I set Super PI affinity to the 1st core and the encoding affinity to the 2nd core (after video encoding had started). Then I started Super PI.
Whilst encoding video, the test took just under an extra 3 seconds to calculate.
[QUOTE="Jiggly_Wiggly"]1.47 qx6700 oc 3.4 ghzDude, how come my test is a tiny bit faster than yours. That CPU should be owning mine. :S
EDIT: didnt know i bumped this...
Wartzay
You should og back 1 pagei ran it again, and got 1.37 :), with fewer applications.
Log in to comment