Medal of honor vs Bad company 2?

MOH was a good blend of both popular shooters out in the market but compared to BFBc2 how does it stand in terms of multiplayer? Is it a twitch shooter like COD? Or perhaps a bit more real like BC2 . I heard the single player was nice.

Better? Worser?

Medal of Honor MP is actually very good. It's more fast paced than BFBC2,and the game modes are a little more in depth then COD. Sector control and the objective based modes are my favorites. It's actually one of the best MP shooters I've played. Only bad point is that there aren't too many unlockable guns and you can't do prestige mode.

MOH is better IMO, since I can never seem to get into BF games because of the shooting mechanics and distant spawning.

When MOh first came out = Entire team were snipers on both sides, was horribly unbalanced. Then they patched it, after the community was already dead. **** game is **** anyway, dice completely abandoned it after releasing the map pack. Only decent part of the game was the single player (which is about 3-4 hours long on the hardest difficulty first time around)

BC2- Multiplayer is pretty good. They gave too much power (Kill players in one hit, kill tanks with mortar strikes) to snipers so in a lot of rush games, the attacking team will just be sitting there herp derping. In urban maps, everyone just runs around with the CG. Aside from that I had a lot of the fun with the game, about 250 hours or so compared to around 23 in MOH.

When MOh first came out = Entire team were snipers on both sides, was horribly unbalanced. Then they patched it, after the community was already dead. **** game is **** anyway, dice completely abandoned it after releasing the map pack. Only decent part of the game was the single player (which is about 3-4 hours long on the hardest difficulty first time around)

BC2- Multiplayer is pretty good. They gave too much power (Kill players in one hit, kill tanks with mortar strikes) to snipers so in a lot of rush games, the attacking team will just be sitting there herp derping. In urban maps, everyone just runs around with the CG. Aside from that I had a lot of the fun with the game, about 250 hours or so compared to around 23 in MOH.

October_Tide

[QUOTE="October_Tide"]

When MOh first came out = Entire team were snipers on both sides, was horribly unbalanced. Then they patched it, after the community was already dead. **** game is **** anyway, dice completely abandoned it after releasing the map pack. Only decent part of the game was the single player (which is about 3-4 hours long on the hardest difficulty first time around)

BC2- Multiplayer is pretty good. They gave too much power (Kill players in one hit, kill tanks with mortar strikes) to snipers so in a lot of rush games, the attacking team will just be sitting there herp derping. In urban maps, everyone just runs around with the CG. Aside from that I had a lot of the fun with the game, about 250 hours or so compared to around 23 in MOH.

narlymech

When I quit, there were about 2k players on in peak times. **** when you play on nz and aussie servers which are 90% empty.

MOH is better. The multiplayer is easier than the BC2 multiplayer though.

I hate BC2 multiplayer, getting shot by guys sitting with assault rifles on hills 1 mile away was annoying as hell. Plus you cant get to learn the game because high levels join the noob servers and ruin it. I really like the BC2 single player though, I am playing through it atm.

Bad Company 2 any day of the week. Even if you're team is just herp derping and charging along open ground, it's still immensley fun to play tactically yourself. Sneaking behind enemy lines, swapping kits to take out a tank....There are several 'Oh Snap!' moments even just in multiplayer, moments you create yourself, such as strapping C4 onto an ATV, driving into a building, detonating and taking out 5 snipers all on second floor, only to whip out the magnum and plug a few killer shots into some craniums :P

The only good thing about MoH 2010 is that you will receive a beta key to play BF3. :P

MoH was trash. It somehow manged to be worse then CoD. And I didn't think that was possible.

The only good thing about MoH 2010 is that you will receive a beta key to play BF3. :P

daniel_br

Will have to wait until September to see if they actually work :roll:

Plat all weaps in BFBC2. You will have the most gameplay you ever have in any game. I'm almost half way there. BFBC2 MP is in a league of it's own and BF3 will be even better. No other FPS MP game compares. BFBC2 SP isn't so great. CoD is way better in SP. MoH got lukewarm reviews, so go BFBC2, you won't regret it. Look at my XFire hours in my sig to see how much I like this game.

Bad Company 2, no contest

I only played MoH multiplayer demo but it wasn't any good. Very small maps and very fast paced gameplay leads to a lot of uncontrollable action. I prefer BC2 which is actually a pretty good game.

BFBC2 all day every day, as long as you play on servers where are a lot less veterans and avoid rush untill you are at least rank 10-15 to gain some experience and get better weapons. I enjoy rush very much but I died a lot while ranking up.

BFBC2 all day every day, as long as you play on servers where are a lot less veterans and avoid rush untill you are at least rank 10-15 to gain some experience and get better weapons. I enjoy rush very much but I died a lot while ranking up.

Silicel1