Lighter Webrowsers

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Angry_Bosmer
Angry_Bosmer

1432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 Angry_Bosmer
Member since 2008 • 1432 Posts
I'm running a older Msi Wind (with an early Atom 1.6ghz) and its starting to show signs of age. I'm only waiting for an Android Tablet like the Eee Transformer to replace but for now I still need it browse the web. Firefox is starting to get irritating and I'm thinking of switching to Chrome. I love the custimization and apps but its not so bad since I running it on my GX740. So I'm wondering any tweaks I can do to Firefox to make it lighter on my low PC power. Is it for adding a gig of ram. Should I give Chrome a try ? I dont feel like the OS is lite enough
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

I love firefox but on a netbook Chrome is clearly superior.

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Chrome is the best for speed and generally being light on system resources.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Chrome is the way to go, they do have quite a few apps now and have really expaned.

Avatar image for JN_Fenrir
JN_Fenrir

1551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 JN_Fenrir
Member since 2004 • 1551 Posts

Firefox absolutely kills my HP Mini 1115NR, even with Flash and Java disabled.

Opera, on the other hand, runs like a dream, and it's an all-around great browser too. I highly recommend it.

Be wary of Chrome. It looks clean, but it can actually be pretty system intensive - particularly because each tab actually runs in its own instance of chrome.exe - and it doesn't take long at all for it to approach Firefox levels of CPU and memory consumption.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25777 Posts

chrome and safar are actually both lower profile from a technical standpoint.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16542 Posts

never tried opera before but I think chrome is the best for a netbook. I personally use it for my netbook as well.

Avatar image for Urworstnhtmare
Urworstnhtmare

2630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 Urworstnhtmare
Member since 2008 • 2630 Posts

The beta for Firefox 4 is pretty light. Which is good because the current official release of Firefox feels bloated. However it now looks like a Safari/Chrome clone.

Avatar image for 29121994
29121994

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 29121994
Member since 2008 • 1166 Posts

Chrome is the best for speed and generally being light on system resources.

Daytona_178
this, i use chrome on my netbook and it runs awesomely :).
Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts
Chrome or Opera 11 for a netbook. Especially for an Early Atom CPU like the one you have.
Avatar image for Angry_Bosmer
Angry_Bosmer

1432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 Angry_Bosmer
Member since 2008 • 1432 Posts

Chrome happens to be worst than Firefox. Its running on about 120mbs while Firefox used 90. Its a little sluggish on one tab. I'll try Opera

Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

Chrome happens to be worst than Firefox. Its running on about 120mbs while Firefox used 90. Its a little sluggish on one tab. I'll try Opera

Angry_Bosmer

Even when Chrome is using more RAM than FF it still loads pages faster. Normally... :P

Opera is definitely worth a try though.

Avatar image for Angry_Bosmer
Angry_Bosmer

1432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 Angry_Bosmer
Member since 2008 • 1432 Posts

[QUOTE="Angry_Bosmer"]

Chrome happens to be worst than Firefox. Its running on about 120mbs while Firefox used 90. Its a little sluggish on one tab. I'll try Opera

Tezcatlipoca666

Even when Chrome is using more RAM than FF it still loads pages faster. Normally... :P

Opera is definitely worth a try though.

Yeah I know but it sluggish at quickly scrolling. I'm liking Opera