COD: Modern Warfare 2 vs. Battlefield Bad Company 2

which one will be the top?

i think it's depends on gamers favourite...

Despite IW's fail this year, I'll still stand behind Call of Duty :|

kind of obvious. MW2 is a boatfull of fail.Dr_Brocoli

can you tell me why? cause i think it's a great game and many gamers waiting for it? so you prefer Bad Company 2?

Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

I like COD but Battlefield has a bigger player capacity, for PC this is much better. My bet Bad Company 2 has more to offer in terms of multiplayer.

I have my doubts with Bad Company 2 with being the better game. When you get pass the controversy MW2 is a fantastic game developed by really incredible talents from IW. BC2 does look very interesting from the feeds I've seen, but I still prefer a game like BF2 for the scale, and of course piloting Jets.

[QUOTE="Dr_Brocoli"]kind of obvious. MW2 is a boatfull of fail.chicack

can you tell me why? cause i think it's a great game and many gamers waiting for it? so you prefer Bad Company 2?

I have my doubts with Bad Company 2 with being the better game. When you get pass the controversy MW2 is a fantastic game developed by really incredible talents from IW. BC2 does look very interesting from the feeds I've seen, but I still prefer a game like BF2 for the scale, and of course piloting Jets.

OoSuperMarioO

i don't know mate..... p2p is definitely effing bad news and i wouldn't call it a "controversy".

BC2 has my vote, in this case.

even if IW wouldn't have failed so bad with MW2, i'd still say Battlefield. i've always liked BF more. vehicles, big maps and teamplay tactics. some thinking involved about how to approach different situations.

COD is more about shooting faster than your opponent.

edit: are there really jets in BC2? i thought there were just choppers

[QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]

I have my doubts with Bad Company 2 with being the better game. When you get pass the controversy MW2 is a fantastic game developed by really incredible talents from IW. BC2 does look very interesting from the feeds I've seen, but I still prefer a game like BF2 for the scale, and of course piloting Jets.

Jinroh_basic

i don't know mate..... p2p is definitely effing bad news and i wouldn't call it a "controversy".

BC2 has my vote, in this case.

Speaking purely based on the game. Even without Dedicated servers and custom content, it still is essentially Modern Warfare 2. If someone can mod in Jets for BC2 then marvelous due to it will take a lot of strength from the mod community to make me feel it's a better game entirely.

[QUOTE="Dr_Brocoli"]kind of obvious. MW2 is a boatfull of fail.chicack

can you tell me why? cause i think it's a great game and many gamers waiting for it? so you prefer Bad Company 2?

I like COD but Battlefield has a bigger player capacity, for PC this is much better. My bet Bad Company 2 has more to offer in terms of multiplayer.

COSMICX815

*gets popcorn*

This is gonna be an interesting debate :D

Always been a huge fan of Battlefield!

I started with the Battlefield series (1942) and loved the first BC. I have no doubts that the second one will wreck shop.

Its funny how everyone is bashing the 9v9. I was actually playing CoD4 yesterday on a server with only 6 players (3v3) we were pretty much working as squads and stuck close together, it was still really fun and intense.

MW2 is a pile of trash, any PC gamer honestly considering buying it do us all a favor and go become a console gamer.

Since MW2 is a direct console port that takes all the great things about PC gaming out of it you should be right at home on xbox live without the frustrating complicated server search or the confusing free community content.

is bfbc2 going to have dedicated servers? if so then yes, if not then neither, mw2 will be so terrible online since it's p2p even on pc T_T

[QUOTE="chicack"]

[QUOTE="Dr_Brocoli"]kind of obvious. MW2 is a boatfull of fail.WDT-BlackKat

can you tell me why? cause i think it's a great game and many gamers waiting for it? so you prefer Bad Company 2?

yep, i'm definitely boycotting :] IW is super failhard.

is bfbc2 going to have dedicated servers? if so then yes, if not then neither, mw2 will be so terrible online since it's p2p even on pc T_T

-Origin-

Speaking purely based on the game. Even without Dedicated servers and custom content, it still is essentially Modern Warfare 2. If someone can mod in Jets for BC2 then marvelous due to it will take a lot of strength from the mod community to make me feel it's a better game entirely.

OoSuperMarioO

And a multiplayer PC FPS without dedicated servers is bound to fail. In terms of multiplayer, the battlefield series surely trumps Call of Campfest.

IMO Bad Company 2 for sure... I've cancelled my pre-order of MW2 and pre-ordered BC 2 yesterday. I'm pretty sure everyone knows why.

I'm not sure I think they will both be great but I think MW2 will be tops in the money making category.

[QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]Speaking purely based on the game. Even without Dedicated servers and custom content, it still is essentially Modern Warfare 2. If someone can mod in Jets for BC2 then marvelous due to it will take a lot of strength from the mod community to make me feel it's a better game entirely.

Swiftstrike5

And a multiplayer PC FPS without dedicated servers is bound to fail. In terms of multiplayer, the battlefield series surely trumps Call of Campfest.

[QUOTE="Swiftstrike5"]

[QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]Speaking purely based on the game. Even without Dedicated servers and custom content, it still is essentially Modern Warfare 2. If someone can mod in Jets for BC2 then marvelous due to it will take a lot of strength from the mod community to make me feel it's a better game entirely.

OoSuperMarioO

And a multiplayer PC FPS without dedicated servers is bound to fail. In terms of multiplayer, the battlefield series surely trumps Call of Campfest.

You should play Arma 2. There are jets. In multiplayer.

I think COD will be more fun, but i like the Destructable environments in BC2. I choose MW2, but i won't be getting either.

Unrealistic, but satisfying nevertheless. I prefer piloting Jets with incredible speeds, utility and maneuvers far more than a boring Helicopter in the air, lol...

Supermario

[QUOTE="Supermario"]Unrealistic, but satisfying nevertheless. I prefer piloting Jets with incredible speeds, utility and maneuvers far more than a boring Helicopter in the air, lol...

Swiftstrike5

no dedicated servers no buy. Iw just made me like BFBC2

This should blow your jets out of the sky. Good 'ol Humvee Avenger.

This should blow your jets out of the sky. Good 'ol Humvee Avenger.

k0r3aN_pR1d3

The many different varieties of combat for BF2 is what makes it a unique FPS for me. Hardly having any Air combat for BC2 is really painful for me. Really hoping Dice provides information for Battlefield 3 much sooner.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYZwUJmJiCY

[QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]

[QUOTE="Swiftstrike5"] Jets were super unrealistic in Battlefield 2 and insanely overpowered. I'd prefer just helicopters and a squad ability to call in different types of airstrikes (napalm, anti-tank, anti-air, etc.). If they made jets more of a challenge to fly (stalls, land to reload, no easy mode boxes showing you were everyone is, etc.) I wouldn't mind their return. At least it'd take some skill to learn and fly.

And a multiplayer PC FPS without dedicated servers is bound to fail. In terms of multiplayer, the battlefield series surely trumps Call of Campfest.

psn8214

You should play Arma 2. There are jets. In multiplayer.

Its funny how everyone is bashing the 9v9. I was actually playing CoD4 yesterday on a server with only 6 players (3v3) we were pretty much working as squads and stuck close together, it was still really fun and intense.

pinneyapple

[QUOTE="psn8214"]

[QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]Unrealistic, but satisfying nevertheless. I prefer piloting Jets with incredible speeds, utility and maneuvers far more than a boring Helicopter in the air, lol...

You should play Arma 2. There are jets. In multiplayer.

OoSuperMarioO

Not on my PC... (Specs: Phenom 2 Quad 3.4 Ghz, GTS 250, 4 Gb RAM...)

My CPU is pretty good, and that's what the game uses most. I would recommend you try the demo; its a great game. I imagine you would enjoy the editor. You could make yourself some pretty intense jet combat sequences...

[QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]

[QUOTE="psn8214"]

psn8214

Not on my PC... (Specs: Phenom 2 Quad 3.4 Ghz, GTS 250, 4 Gb RAM...)

My CPU is pretty good, and that's what the game uses most. I would recommend you try the demo; its a great game. I imagine you would enjoy the editor. You could make yourself some pretty intense jet combat sequences...

[QUOTE="psn8214"]

[QUOTE="OoSuperMarioO"]I'm told Arma 2 is rough in terms of performance bud.

OoSuperMarioO

Not on my PC... (Specs: Phenom 2 Quad 3.4 Ghz, GTS 250, 4 Gb RAM...)

My CPU is pretty good, and that's what the game uses most. I would recommend you try the demo; its a great game. I imagine you would enjoy the editor. You could make yourself some pretty intense jet combat sequences...

Its a huge demo that lets you try the editor and everything. Enjoy it!

After playing the first Bad Company, definetly BC2. It goes even higher above Modern Warfare 2 when you count everything Infinity Ward took out of it.

thx anyway for your reply, so i see many people choose BC2

i'm a fans of battlefield too, and i prefer BC 2 rather than MW2 cause it's multiplayer size and map, but not saying that MW 2 isn't a good game, i just miss the news saying that MW 2 is a bad game...