Battle: Los Angeles anyone...?

Haven't seen the movie yet, but I found out there is a game...

Anyone played it?

Reviews? Scores?

(please don't say movie games are bad, just asking if anyone has actually played it or seen it)

Very short(just under two hours, and I play slow), can only use three weapons, graphics aren't terrible, the controls are meh, sprint blows and it's only 10 bucks.\

I was bored yesterday...don't judge me. It's an AVERAGE movie game.

Very short(just under two hours, and I play slow), can only use three weapons, graphics aren't terrible, the controls are meh, sprint blows and it's only 10 bucks.\

I was bored yesterday...don't judge me. It's an AVERAGE movie game.

airshocker

Terminator: Salvation was MUCH better than this game.

I haven't seen the movie, though. So I can't tell you if it's part of the storyline or just a reduced version of it.

Terminator: Salvation was MUCH better than this game.

I haven't seen the movie, though. So I can't tell you if it's part of the storyline or just a reduced version of it.

airshocker

It's Black Hawk Down with aliens. If you go in expecting that you'll enjoy the movie just fine.

Haven't played the game but to answer your question, the movie is more of a war film. It's light on the emotional aspects and not very terrifying at all...(not that I expected a horror film).

Don't know about the game. But the movie is diabolical. You cant even enjoy as a pure action thing. biggest_loser

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]Don't know about the game. But the movie is diabolical. You cant even enjoy as a pure action thing. FelipeInside

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"]Don't know about the game. But the movie is diabolical. You cant even enjoy as a pure action thing. biggest_loser

Yeah, very short game man, played it to the end yesterday and racked up less than 50 minutes of gameplay according to Steam! Yeah, that short.

Very short(just under two hours, and I play slow), can only use three weapons, graphics aren't terrible, the controls are meh, sprint blows and it's only 10 bucks.\

airshocker

No idea how you got 2 hours out of the game lol, I thought I played games kind of slow -- in particular enjoying first person shooters that don't lead by the hand or tightly control pacing and allow wider "exploration" off the beaten-path if desired. For example games more in the style of Crysis as opposed to COD, however, Battlefield LA is much more similar in style to COD. Not that the latter style cannot provide a fun ride, the greatest compliment I can give the game is at the end I really wanted to keep playing!! Although on second thought that might have been to due to playing for less than 50 minutes.

Sprint is an exercise in futility as already mentioned, however, controls and shooting mechanics were tight, the gameplay was fun (enough) and familiar. Although the game suffered from mainstream-ification with lack of prone and lean (what's new? it's 50 minutes long, you won't notice, but....I suppose I did). I was more disappointed that it didn't properly support 16:10 widescreen aspect-ratio, i.e. black bars top and bottom of screen for 1650X1080, 1920X1200, etc.

Visuals were good enough to get the job done considering it's a $10 game, the Saber 3D engine (at least in it's TimeShift implementation) dazzled much better on PC than on consoles. Not sure if that's still the case, however, I'd say it's a mixed-bag on the PC -- loving the explosions, hating the weapon models as one example. I know there will be those that will delight in the comic-book presentation of the cut-scenes, but for me personally those were atrocious! "Yo, we have no budget left for our budget game. Kenny down the hall knows flash animation doesn't he? Let's have him put together some cut-scenes for us. Yeaahhh, that'll work. Awesome son!"

Not worth more than the $10 asking price, but not the worst you've played either.

I played the demo on the 360, it's decent, but that's it, I've spent less money on much worse games (Necrovision for example).

Also, Cloverfield original? LOL

I played the demo on the 360, it's decent, but that's it, I've spent less money on much worse games (Necrovision for example).

Also, Cloverfield original? LOL

KillerJuan77

Cloverfield original as in they used the amateur cam and told from a survivors point of view.....

Please don't give pay money for this game. Its 10$ for ONE hour of gameplay. Think of all the other great and fantastic games you can buy for only 10$.

Please don't give pay money for this game. Its 10$ for ONE hour of gameplay. Think of all the other great and fantastic games you can buy for only 10$.

JangoWuzHere

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

Please don't give pay money for this game. Its 10$ for ONE hour of gameplay. Think of all the other great and fantastic games you can buy for only 10$.

FelipeInside

You can do better.....WAAAY better with 10$.

I liked Cloverfield, (I saw it cheap and bought it for a friend, we had to skip the terrible party scene though.)

I saw a TV spot for it, which was like 30 seconds of the most interesting stuff in the movie and I though that it look about average, until I saw the title. I nearly exploded in laughter.

I haven't played, probably won't and I'm not going to get the game. If you want a summer action movie game, I suggest Legendary. Gamespot doesn't like it, but it gets fun after the first level.

I watcheda trailer for the movie, and some of it looks kind of good (the action sequences, the destruction, the soldiers) but the rest looks bad. I'd put money on that the director/writer live in LA and couldn't bothered to leave LA, so he replaced whatever city that was written in to LA.

What !!!!

That's where the hot brunette turns up in that hot dress !!!