AMD arming new tahiti to fight 660ti. welcome hd 7890!!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25777 Posts

amd is arming a new tahiti gpu. the hd 7890 as we can call it for now is going to be ahead of the 7870 but behinbd the 7950. currently according to source its going to be in the 7800 family and is based on the tahiti LE architecture.

details are atm murky at best but amd expects to have it ready before the end of november

http://ht4u.net/news/26462_amd_bringt_tahiti_le_im_november_-_neues_radeon-hd-7800-modell/

Avatar image for BeerMage
BeerMage

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 BeerMage
Member since 2009 • 267 Posts

But they already have a GPU that spanks the gtx 660 ti at it's price point. It's called Radeon HD 7950.

Avatar image for free_milk
free_milk

3903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#3 free_milk
Member since 2011 • 3903 Posts

But they already have a GPU that spanks the gtx 660 ti at it's price point. It's called Radeon HD 7950.

BeerMage
The 7870 is very close to the GTX 660 ti.
Avatar image for Guovssohas
Guovssohas

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Guovssohas
Member since 2010 • 330 Posts
That's good i guess. But is it really needed? I mean the 7870 is already at spitting distance from the 660ti.
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16539 Posts

the 7870 is +/- 1% of the 660ti performance. Last I checked, it was 1% faster at 1080p res in all games.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Not really sure why they need this card. There isn't a heck of a lot of room to stick another card in between the 7870 and 7950.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

Not really sure why they need this card. There isn't a heck of a lot of room to stick another card in between the 7870 and 7950.

hartsickdiscipl

To maximise yields, failed 7950 would be repositioned as 7890 or AMD releases the consumer version of FireGL W8000 i.e. 79x0 level GPU with 256bit wide bus (cheaper PCB).

Avatar image for deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510
deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510

17401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510
Member since 2007 • 17401 Posts
[QUOTE="BeerMage"]

But they already have a GPU that spanks the gtx 660 ti at it's price point. It's called Radeon HD 7950.

free_milk
The 7870 is very close to the GTX 660 ti.

No, you're thinking of the GTX 660. The ti is a step up.
Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#9 jhcho2  Online
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

That card is not needed at all. AMD should instead focus on a gpu which is better than the 7970, like say....a 7980, which could beat the GTX 680 is every area.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25777 Posts

what their doing is forcing nvidia up a market segment.

ever since the 8800 series walloped amd senseless they have had to claw back from the bottom. when they did so they preformed a fortification system.

they would focus their efforts on strengthening their lowest end and then move up. the APU is one such fortification. nvidia rather than compete directly with or udnercutting the amd products has simply moved up because their revenue is at the higher end anyway. amd has then been moving up market segments

in the 5000 series it was the 5770 that got the attention, with the 6000 series it was te 6850 getting reinforced with the 6790 and the apu. with the 7 series they have a fresh line of lower fortifications from trinity and the hd 7800 series is where the attention is being given. and nvidia rather than undercut or directluy compete has simply gone up a price segment.

nvidia's financial results reflect this alot actually with their revenue up 15% and their profits down from last year. they are judging revenue as the measure of success

i expect next gen nvidia will have a killer high end gpu forged of mithril, a #70 series card thats compareable to AMD's high end and then the gtx #60 series will be given little attention and will get crushed by amd's competitive thrust upwards.

this trend will continue until AMD has effectively tossed nvidia into a price tag that nobody wants to buy cards for at the high end. which puts them in a very bad spot financially.

amd tried doing this to intel back in intels 1st pentium IV run before the move the lga 775. and if left unchecked this innovative dilema will send nvidia without a paddle down sh!ts creek

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16539 Posts

That card is not needed at all. AMD should instead focus on a gpu which is better than the 7970, like say....a 7980, which could beat the GTX 680 is every area.

jhcho2

no point, the 7970 ghz already beats the 680 in every area.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

That card is not needed at all. AMD should instead focus on a gpu which is better than the 7970, like say....a 7980, which could beat the GTX 680 is every area.

jhcho2

perfrel_2560.gif

7970GEvsGTX680.jpg

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#13 jhcho2  Online
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

why is everyone only quoting techpowerup? is it because it favours AMD? Where are the guru3D and Anandtech results? And good job showing comparisons between OC'ed 7970s against standard 680s and then again at 2560x1600 which clearly favours AMD cards due to their cards having more memory

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16539 Posts

why is everyone only quoting techpowerup? is it because it favours AMD? Where are the guru3D and Anandtech results? And good job showing comparisons between OC'ed 7970s against standard 680s and then again at 2560x1600 which clearly favours AMD cards due to their cards having more memory

jhcho2

the ghz edition isn't overclocked, that is the factory setting its set to. The geforce 680 is also at 1 ghz clock speed. The 7970 is simply faster clock for clock than the 680gtx. Toms hardware already rates 7970 ghz as the best single video card on the market. Why do you think the 680 has dropped in price recently? Because the 7970 is faster and cheaper. Whats your point on the resolution exactly? It just means that its more future proof.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#15 jhcho2  Online
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

why is everyone only quoting techpowerup? is it because it favours AMD? Where are the guru3D and Anandtech results? And good job showing comparisons between OC'ed 7970s against standard 680s and then again at 2560x1600 which clearly favours AMD cards due to their cards having more memory

blaznwiipspman1

the ghz edition isn't overclocked, that is the factory setting its set to. The geforce 680 is also at 1 ghz clock speed. The 7970 is simply faster clock for clock than the 680gtx. Toms hardware already rates 7970 ghz as the best single video card on the market. Why do you think the 680 has dropped in price recently? Because the 7970 is faster and cheaper. Whats your point on the resolution exactly? It just means that its more future proof.

Future proof? I dunno about you, but i have no intention on sticking to one card for more than four years. That's like light years in pc hardware terms

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

why is everyone only quoting techpowerup? is it because it favours AMD? Where are the guru3D and Anandtech results? And good job showing comparisons between OC'ed 7970s against standard 680s and then again at 2560x1600 which clearly favours AMD cards due to their cards having more memory

jhcho2
Like any CPU vendor, the GPU design vendor sets the clock speed. 7970 GE follows 7870 GE and 7770 GE i.e. GE = "Ghz Edition" SKU.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

why is everyone only quoting techpowerup? is it because it favours AMD? Where are the guru3D and Anandtech results? And good job showing comparisons between OC'ed 7970s against standard 680s and then again at 2560x1600 which clearly favours AMD cards due to their cards having more memory

jhcho2

the ghz edition isn't overclocked, that is the factory setting its set to. The geforce 680 is also at 1 ghz clock speed. The 7970 is simply faster clock for clock than the 680gtx. Toms hardware already rates 7970 ghz as the best single video card on the market. Why do you think the 680 has dropped in price recently? Because the 7970 is faster and cheaper. Whats your point on the resolution exactly? It just means that its more future proof.

Future proof? I dunno about you, but i have no intention on sticking to one card for more than four years. That's like light years in pc hardware terms

With the PC, it's your choice.
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25777 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

why is everyone only quoting techpowerup? is it because it favours AMD? Where are the guru3D and Anandtech results? And good job showing comparisons between OC'ed 7970s against standard 680s and then again at 2560x1600 which clearly favours AMD cards due to their cards having more memory

jhcho2

the ghz edition isn't overclocked, that is the factory setting its set to. The geforce 680 is also at 1 ghz clock speed. The 7970 is simply faster clock for clock than the 680gtx. Toms hardware already rates 7970 ghz as the best single video card on the market. Why do you think the 680 has dropped in price recently? Because the 7970 is faster and cheaper. Whats your point on the resolution exactly? It just means that its more future proof.

Future proof? I dunno about you, but i have no intention on sticking to one card for more than four years. That's like light years in pc hardware terms

stop talking to ron.. here is a conversation with ron ft. a joke (artisits interpretation)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc8s3LPehWM

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

amd is arming a new tahiti gpu. the hd 7890 as we can call it for now is going to be ahead of the 7870 but behinbd the 7950. currently according to source its going to be in the 7800 family and is based on the tahiti LE architecture.

details are atm murky at best but amd expects to have it ready before the end of november

http://ht4u.net/news/26462_amd_bringt_tahiti_le_im_november_-_neues_radeon-hd-7800-modell/

ionusX

From http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/11/12/fall_2012_gpu_driver_comparison_roundup/1

1352691741F74TQBhKZT_3_5.png

1352691741F74TQBhKZT_7_5.png

Avatar image for Guovssohas
Guovssohas

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Guovssohas
Member since 2010 • 330 Posts
Wow the 660ti is incredibly overpriced, at this moment it's just a waste of a card.
Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#22 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5582 Posts

Wow the 660ti is incredibly overpriced, at this moment it's just a waste of a card.Guovssohas

That's an understatement.

Avatar image for Souvs
Souvs

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Souvs
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
with 12.11beta ,7900 series beats Kepler counterpart ----http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pagesprinter/his_7970_iceq_xsup2_ghz_edition_7950_iceq_xsup2_bo ost_clock,1.html frostbite 2 crown also goes to 7900 series-- ---http://www.techspot.com/review/591-medal-of-honor-warfighter-benchmarks/ (7890 will outperform 660ti and 7950 boost is comparable to gtx 670...and due to huge oc potential of gcn and lower price tag,7950 boost gives gtx 680 run for the money right out of the box as kepler has locked voltages and very low oc potential...even ref 7950 goes to 1200 core....emotianally invested people should research it before buying blindly....