[QUOTE="thenewau25"][QUOTE="thegfl"][QUOTE="thenewau25"][QUOTE="chesterocks7"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="thenewau25"] [QUOTE="SuperBeast"]GT is the site that refused to give Crysis the best graphics of the year award because of how demanding it was and it wouldn't be "fair" for the other games. Thats the day I stopped going to that site. zomglolcats
thats why i love these guys they dont care only about crysis ulike 80% of pc & mac forums
Lol thenew stop posting seriously, we arn't talking about the quality of the game we are talkinga bout its graphics.. Which is undeniable how good it looks REGARDLESS how much you despise it, and then hump the leg of Farcry 2.. :P
For real kid, you cannot deny that Crysis is the best looking game ever made, no matter how much you hate it. If you try to deny it, no one is going to take you seriously.
am no kid i dont deny being the most technical advanced in graphical section but graphics are a taste eg i dont give a damn about the way it looks ill go fo far cry 2 and fallout 3, but seriously the ONLY reason the graphics are so good is the high requirements that consoles can much, crysis has much higher requirements than outher games to max out, if every game had so good graphics then we gonna need better video cards, just like oblivion some years ago or far cry 1, few pcs can max them, so the fact crysis or whatever outher game comes out EXCLUSIVLY on pc and has the best graphics, is cheating in competition by settings the standards too high, dont you think that they could do the same with eg far cry 2 or fallout 3, IF they werent so wide and open worldmap games, and IF they were only in pc? eg doom 3 was a pc exclusive that still you need an 8800 to max out even the 16X antialising, so simply doom 3 had so good graphics cuz it require a pc from feature, thats what fear did, and came out later in x360 that it was "possible to work with so good graphics in a console" ,NOT ON RELEASE BUT LATER! thats what crysis does and thats what doom did tey set graphics too high eg brother in arms came after a year from doom 3, but the graphics were a joke compared to doom 3, but still considered great , DUH, see jsut like chronicles or riddick amazing graphics but few know of the game so outher games considered as great graphics, thats why gt didn give it the reward because it did the same as far cry that came before doom 3, they gave as graphics that "back then" most of us couldnt handle, the term great graphics somes with great optimization in consoles, so having a greater pc made to get those graphics, eg the vista dx10 excuse made it like comparing a Plasystation 4 to x360, so crysis was so superior that it demanded a next generation system that consoles though as impossible, crysis graphics were too good so good that requiere to compare the game for the xbox console and not x360, crysis was way too good to win the award, its a pure winner not a compettitor since its superior so they keep it away from compatition and compare the equal technology games, every heard of weight category? you dont let someone weight 120 kg to fight with outhers that weight about 50 -80 kg!
Crysis has better graphics than any game available technically, that's a fact. Sorry.
THATS EXACTLY WHAT I SAID DID YOU EVEN READ? WHAT I SAID IS THAT THE TECHNICAL SECTOR IS SO HIGH THAT THEY CANT COMPARE IT WITH X360 OR PS3, IN FACT THEY GONNA HAVE TO COMPARE IT TO A PS4 SO ITS FAIR, EVER HEARD OF WEIGHT CATERGORIES? YOU DONT SEND SOMEONE WEIGHT 120 KG TO FIGHT PEOPLE WHO WEIGHT 50- 80 KG! THATS WHY CRYSIS CAN BE COMPARE IT BELONGS TO THE CATEGORY OF THE NEXT CONSOLES SINCE THEY CANT MUCH, IT GT REVIEWS BELIEVES THAT CRYSIS JSUT LIKE FAR CRY IS CHEATING BY SIMPLE USING A PC FROM SPACE TO LOOK SUPERIOR THAN CONSOLES SO IT CANT BE COMPARED WITH X360 AND PS3 THAT DONT KNOW WHAT DX10 IS , SO ITS OUT OF COMPETITION, ITS LIKE SENDING A PROFESSIONAL TO COMPETITE WITH AMATEURS, now if i like crysis graphics thats another thing...
Crysis shouldn't be compared to consoles period, since you can't own it on one. How about comparing PC games with PC games, and console games with console games? Your analogy is innaccurate to say the least. There is no reason a game, Crysis or not, should get a lower score in graphics because consoles can't handle it. That's completely asanine.
let me explain
SuperBeast wrote: GT is the site that refused to give Crysis the best graphics of the year award because of how demanding it was and it wouldn't be "fair" for the other games. Thats the day I stopped going to that site.
I said yeah and explained what happen and its true crysis requirements are like it should be compared with the next consoles eg playstation 4 so they couldnt compare it it was far too superior in technologies that x360 and ps3 could NEVER use, so yes i agreee that its a stupid thing to give lower score to a game just for that, but the reason they did it cuz crysis just like far cry and doom 3, demanded from a pc to use at least 1 year later hardware since the game came out, so crytek was like screw them we will make a game with graphics a lot over the limits so the consoles cant match as, as result that was like cheating as doom 3 and fear did, remeber fear it came out later on x360, so thats the point, in order a game to win the best graphics award it has to smply show graphics like it was released one year later and judging by that the requirements will be much higher so every game that increases the graphics is the winner, at the end the game will alg terribly if you keep it this way, but in consoles they optimize the graphics but crytek NEVER cared about optimizng, they always say dont worry you gonna max our game with the next year hardware!(i am talking about far cry 1) so id rahter to say that it aint gt fault but the reviwers who at the same time decided to keep the console anger down, try to keep all ina good stat, we gotta make sacrifises!
Log in to comment