This is from TechpowerUp:
First Alleged GTX TITAN-X Benchmarks Surface
Here are some of the first purported benchmarks of NVIDIA's upcoming flagship graphics card, the GeForce GTX TITAN-X. Someone with access the four of these cards installed them on a system driven by a Core i7-5960X eight-core processor, and compared its single-GPU and 4-way SLI performance on 3DMark 11, with its "extreme" (X) preset. The card scored X7994 points going solo - comparable to Radeon R9 290X 2-way CrossFire, and a single GeForce GTX TITAN-Z. With four of these cards in play, you get X24064 points. Sadly, there's nothing you can compare that score with.
NVIDIA unveiled the GeForce GTX TITAN-X at the Game Developers Conference (GDC) 2015. It was just that - an unveiling, with no specs, performance numbers, or launch date announced. The card is rumored to be based on the GM200 silicon - NVIDIA's largest based on the "Maxwell" architecture - featuring 3072 CUDA cores, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 12 GB of memory. The benchmark screenshots reveal core clock speeds to be around 1.00 GHz, and the memory clock at 7.00 GHz.
No simple Firestrike scores though :P.
I think I found more from Videocardz:
Like always, we bring you the first performance figures of soon-to-be-released enthusiast graphics card called GeForce GTX TITAN-X.
GeForce GTX TITAN X specifications
While we are still waiting for Jen-Hsun to send us PowerPoint presentation, we do know some specification tidbits that you may find interesting. First of all, the base clock is set to rather low frequency of 1002 MHz. The memory clock is pretty much what you’ve expected, 1753 MHz (7 GHz effective). TITAN X has 384-bit interface, so the maximum theoretical bandwidth is 336 GB/s (I think theoretical is the key word when it comes to describing NVIDIA cards these days). The new TITAN has 12GB GDDR5 frame buffer, twice as much as TITAN and TITAN BLACK, three times more than GeForce GTX 980.
We’ve been told TITAN X will cost 999 USD, just as previous TITANs. We can’t confirm it yet, but we will keep you updated once we learn more.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Series Specifications | |||
---|---|---|---|
GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | GeForce GTX TITAN | |
Picture | |||
GPU | 28nm GM200 | 28nm GK110-430 | 28nm GK110-430 |
CUDA Cores | 3072 TBC | 2880 | 2688 |
TMUs | 192 TBC | 240 | 224 |
ROPs | 96 TBC | 48 | 48 |
Core clock | 1002 MHz | 889 MHz | 836 MHz |
Boost Clock | ? MHz TBC | 980 MHz | 876 MHz |
Memory Clock | 1750 MHz | 1750 MHz | 1502 MHz |
Memory Bus | 384-bit | 384-bit | 384-bit |
Memory | 12GB GDDR5 | 6GB GDDR5 | 6GB GDDR5 |
Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 336 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
TDP | 230W TBC | 250W | 250W |
Power Connectors | 1x 6pin; 1x 8pin | 1x 6pin; 1x 8pin | 1x 6pin; 1x 8pin |
Display Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DP | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DP | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DP |
MSRP | 999 USD TBC | 999 USD | 999 USD |
GeForce GTX TITAN X performance
GeForce GTX TITAN X performs really well in synthetic benchmarks. Interestingly we also have Quadro M6000 FireStrike score, which seems to perform just as fast as its gaming variant. It does somewhat confirm both cards have the same GPU configuration.
We also have SLI scaling tests, bear in mind though, SLI tests were performed at non-reference speed.
Moar from chiphell :P
Ofcourse all of these becnhmarks came from the future through a time hole that appeared near to some people :P
This is still under NDA....
Final edit(lol): By the way, Videocardz's Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming sux with only 11053 graphics score.
My Gigabyte GTX 970 G1 Gaming at default factory clock has 12212 graphics score...
Log in to comment