AMD RX 300 series rumours

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127503 Posts

So browsing http://www.overclock3d.net/articles/gpu_displays/amd_rx_300_series_specs_revealed/1, I came across some specs rumours about the next generation cards from AMD.

GPURumoured SpecsRomoured Launch Date
AMD Radeon R9 395X2GCN 1.3; 8192 GPU Cores; 8GB 8192-bit HBMQ4 2015
AMD Radeon R9 390X
GCN 1.3; 4096 GPU Cores; 4GB 4092-bit HBM
Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 390
GCN 1.3; 3520 GPU Cores; 4GB 4092-bit HBM
Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 380XGCN 1.1; 2816 GPU Cores; 4GB 512-bit GDDR5 (R9 290X)Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 380GCN 1.1; 2560 GPU Cores; 4GB 512-bit GDDR5 (R9 290)Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 370xGCN 1.2; 2048 GPU Cores; 3GB 384-bit GDDR5Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 370GCN 1.2; 1792 GPU Cores; 2GB 256-bit GDDR5 (R9 285)Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 360XGCN 1.3; Unknown number of GPU cores; 2GB 256-bit GDDR5Q1 2015
AMD Radeon R9 360GCN 1.3; Unknown number of GPU cores; 2GB 256-bit GDDR5

Q1 2015

Seeing the 4092bit memory configuration for the R9 390(x) cards, I wonder what speed they will run at. Seeing the potential for some extreme bandwidth there. Though I doubt it will happen.

The most interesting change in AMD's R9 390 series, apart from the massive GPU core count is the change over to High Bandwidth memory, which will give higher performance and lower power consumption than GDDR5 memory. The move to HBM will be a very welcome change as 4K become more and more popular and ever more affordable. Hopefully the GCN 1.3 Architecture will provide us with some efficiency improvements as the AMD R9 290 series was already rwell known for it's high temperatures and large power consumption.

I hope this doesn't turn out to be an even more extreme leafblower than their current top line cards. As they will now take the spot 380(X). Do you think AMD will put out some decent cards this time?

Avatar image for deactivated-579f651eab962
deactivated-579f651eab962

5404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By deactivated-579f651eab962
Member since 2003 • 5404 Posts

It's very exciting to see this 380x and to see Nvidia's response. Nice to see the GPU moving forward at last.

Avatar image for xantufrog
xantufrog

17875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#3 xantufrog  Moderator
Member since 2013 • 17875 Posts

Cool - I need a new GPU and am waiting for the chips to fall on these things before deciding.

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

390 and 390x should be 6-8GB

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#5 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

it does not make sense. Why would they use the older GCN 1.1 and 1.2 architecture in 370 and 380 series ( and probably the series that will sell most among enthusiasts )

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts

370 and 380 series will be rebrands.

I read also rumors for 1 more GPU between 380X and 390, cause the gap could be too high...

But rumors are just... rumors.

@GioVela2010 said:

390 and 390x should be 6-8GB

8GB maybe but not 6GB.

1st gen HBM can be 4x1GB VRAM. So 4GB and maybe 8GB etc etc...

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

17808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 225

User Lists: 0

#7 BassMan
Member since 2002 • 17808 Posts
@GioVela2010 said:

390 and 390x should be 6-8GB

I find this surprising too. AMD likes to have ample VRAM. To have only 4 GB with the push for 4K is questionable to say the least.

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts

Actually the source of this article is from Videocardz.

We still remain skeptical about 4096 Stream Cores in Fiji. However, if that’s true, then we will be seeing a huge gap between Fiji and Hawaii. That said, I wouldn’t be surprised to see a third Fiji model, which I’m calling R9 385X ‘The Gap-Filler’. Just remember, this scenario only makes sense for full Fiji with 4096 cores. Otherwise (and I think more likely), there won’t be any large gaps between 390 and 380 series. Personally I don’t think Fiji has more than 60 CUs, but well, hopefully I’m wrong.

AMD Radeon Rx 300 Series (Speculation)
GPUPossible SpecsPossible Launch Date
AMD Radeon R9 395X2Bermuda (Fiji x2)GCN 1.3; 8192 (?) Cores; 8192-bit 8GB HBMQ4 2015
AMD Radeon R9 390XFiji XTGCN 1.3; 4096 (?) Cores; 4096-bit 4GB HBMQ2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 390Fiji PROGCN 1.3; 3840 (?) Cores; 4096-bit 4GB HBMQ2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 385XFiji CE (?)GCN 1.3; 3328 (?) Cores; 2048-bit 2GB HBM(?)
AMD Radeon R9 380XGrenada XTX (Hawaii)GCN 1.1; 2816 Cores; 512-bit 4GB GDDR5Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 380Grenada PRO (Hawaii)GCN 1.1; 2560 Cores; 512-bit 4GB GDDR5Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 370XTonga XTGCN 1.2; 2048 Cores; 384-bit 3GB GDDR5Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 370Tonga PROGCN 1.2; 1792 Cores; 256-bit 2GB GDDR5Q2 2015
AMD Radeon R9 360XTrinidadGCN 1.3; (?) Cores; 256-bit 2GB GDDR5Q1 2015
AMD Radeon R9 360TrinidadGCN 1.3; (?) Cores; 256-bit 2GB GDDR5Q1 2015

Radeon R9 395X2 “Bermuda”

Starting with Bermuda. You probably heard this name before, but no one was certain if Bermuda is the actual flagship GPU or something else. Well as a matter of fact Bermuda could actually be the Vesuvius successor (R9 295X2). Radeon R9 395X2 would be a direct competitor to rumored GTX 990 (likely dual-GM204).

Radeon R9 390(X) “Fiji”

According to 3DCenter, Fiji is “confirmed” as next flagship GPU. The R9 390X will likely be powered by Fiji XT, whereas R9 390 with Fiji PRO. Fiji-powered graphics cards are said to be the first with High-Bandwidth-Memory on board. NVIDIA will possibly adopt HBM with Pascal, so we are looking at months, or maybe even years, of AMD leadership in this technology.

Radeon R9 380(X) “Grenada”

I think it was quite obvious Hawaii, which was released in late 2013, would not be forgotten in upcoming 300 series. The rumor has it that Hawaii will be renamed to Grenada. Does it mean architectural changes? Likely not, but we expect Grenada to be more power efficient, and configured with higher clock speeds.

Radeon R9 370(X) “Tonga”

Tonga was first released with Radeon R9 285. AMD had plans to release R9 285X (this is not a rumor), however due to GTX 970 announcement, those plans had to be changed. The full Tonga is actually equipped with 384-bit interface, so R9 370X should launch with 3GB on board. We are looking at potential GM206 competitor here.

Radeon R7 360(X) “Trinidad”

Trinidad is Curacao (Pitcairn) replacement expected to launch with Radeon R7 360 series. The only information we have is limited to memory configuration of 256-bit and 2GB frame buffer. Additionally, Trinidad may be the first card of Radeon 300 series, as it’s currently planned for March (according to VR-Zone).

I was thinking posting it too, but there are too many rumors and they are changing (like the 7970 with the XDR VRAM...) in the final product...

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127503 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:

390 and 390x should be 6-8GB

Maybe 8 as previously stated by someone else. Don't think 6GB will work. Indeed if they jump up to 8GB RAM, I might get one, later another 390X. I'll put a waterblock on it so heat shouldn't be a problem.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127503 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:

390 and 390x should be 6-8GB

Maybe 8 as previously stated by someone else. Don't think 6GB will work. Indeed if they jump up to 8GB RAM, I might get one, later another 390X. I'll put a waterblock on it so heat shouldn't be a problem.

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11698 Posts

Waiting for that 390X and getting two of them to upgrade from 7970 Trifire. Was going to go Nvidia but meh, upgrade jump not worth it right now and 980Ti and Titan II will be overpriced like usual.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts
@ShadowDeathX said:

Waiting for that 390X and getting two of them to upgrade from 7970 Trifire. Was going to go Nvidia but meh, upgrade jump not worth it right now and 980Ti and Titan II will be overpriced like usual.

Doubt that the 390x will be priced lower then you think remember the release price of the 7970? Expect near a $600 price tag,

But the reason why 4gb is the current limit is because of the 1st gen HBM stack limit. 2nd gen is suppose to allow more then 4gb per module

Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11698 Posts

$550 is fine. I'll buy two at that price.

Avatar image for Postosuchus
Postosuchus

907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By Postosuchus
Member since 2005 • 907 Posts

Very disappointed about the 370(x) 380(x) rebrands. Isn't the Hawaii family "volcanic" in terms of heat and power consumption? Seems very inappropriate for (upper) midrange cards, especially considering Nvidia's recent power conservation gains. Maybe with the 4xx series we'll see some proper midrange offerings with the new memory system.

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

I am going to wait until Pascal comes out and see what happens from there.

Hopefully by 2016 games will be demanding enough to warranty having these new GPUs.

The only ones from the 3xx family of AMD worth caring about are the 390 and 390x.

But I will wait until 2016 when they iron things out with the 4xx series.

Avatar image for PfizersaurusRex
PfizersaurusRex

1503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 PfizersaurusRex
Member since 2012 • 1503 Posts

@Postosuchus said:

Very disappointed about the 370(x) 380(x) rebrands. Isn't the Hawaii family "volcanic" in terms of heat and power consumption? Seems very inappropriate for (upper) midrange cards, especially considering Nvidia's recent power conservation gains. Maybe with the 4xx series we'll see some proper midrange offerings with the new memory system.

It's exactly what I'm thinking. I hope this info is bogus, but I have a feeling that it's real. This HBM thing may still be too expensive for midrange to have competitive price. I guess if the price is low enough I might even bite, but GTX 970 looks much more attractive to me. Or GTX 960Ti, if it will have the same silicon. And I'm saying this as a neutral guy in terms of brand preference, when it's time to upgrade I go for the best deal.

Avatar image for Postosuchus
Postosuchus

907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Postosuchus
Member since 2005 • 907 Posts

@PfizersaurusRex said:

@Postosuchus said:

Very disappointed about the 370(x) 380(x) rebrands. Isn't the Hawaii family "volcanic" in terms of heat and power consumption? Seems very inappropriate for (upper) midrange cards, especially considering Nvidia's recent power conservation gains. Maybe with the 4xx series we'll see some proper midrange offerings with the new memory system.

It's exactly what I'm thinking. I hope this info is bogus, but I have a feeling that it's real. This HBM thing may still be too expensive for midrange to have competitive price. I guess if the price is low enough I might even bite, but GTX 970 looks much more attractive to me. Or GTX 960Ti, if it will have the same silicon. And I'm saying this as a neutral guy in terms of brand preference, when it's time to upgrade I go for the best deal.

Most likely, GDDR4 and GDDR5 were high-end only the first generation they appeared as I recall.. Although a top end AMD card in 2008 was only $300 (really miss those prices). My big fear is that AMD pulls the same rebranding stunts for the 4xx series and we're once again left with mid-range cards that can double as space heaters.

Avatar image for insane_metalist
insane_metalist

7797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#18 insane_metalist
Member since 2006 • 7797 Posts

So they release 8GB 290X and with new gen to continue with 4GB? Waaaw! I hope, these rumors aren't true.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19  Edited By 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts

@insane_metalist said:

So they release 8GB 290X and with new gen to continue with 4GB? Waaaw! I hope, these rumors aren't true.

Its the current limits of 1st gen HBM, 2nd gen will allow 16gb or more. Right now their limited to 4 hi, 2016 HBM will allow 8hi stacks, but also by then memory density will be much greater.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20  Edited By horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127503 Posts

@04dcarraher said:

@insane_metalist said:

So they release 8GB 290X and with new gen to continue with 4GB? Waaaw! I hope, these rumors aren't true.

Its the current limits of 1st gen HBM, 2nd gen will allow 16gb or more. Right now their limited to 4 hi, 2016 HBM will allow 8hi stacks, but also by then memory density will be much greater.

Well they still got the same amount of VRAM as nVidia does though. However this might make me go for full sized Maxwell when I upgrade in a year or so.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts
@horgen said:

@04dcarraher said:

@insane_metalist said:

So they release 8GB 290X and with new gen to continue with 4GB? Waaaw! I hope, these rumors aren't true.

Its the current limits of 1st gen HBM, 2nd gen will allow 16gb or more. Right now their limited to 4 hi, 2016 HBM will allow 8hi stacks, but also by then memory density will be much greater.

Well they still got the same amount of VRAM as nVidia does though. However this might make me go for full sized Maxwell when I upgrade in a year or so.

Problem is that, Even with the 390x being upto 50% faster then the 290x the 4gb buffer is still not enough for 4k gaming, let alone max settings above 1080 in some cases.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127503 Posts

@04dcarraher: That I know. We can always hope they release some 8GB versions of those cards not so long after they are initially released.

Avatar image for daious
Daious

2315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#24 Daious
Member since 2013 • 2315 Posts

@GioVela2010 said:

390 and 390x should be 6-8GB

400 series will have it. First gen HBM is limited to 4gb it seems.