World Wrestling Entertainment

Yeah the WWE title match was the only thing I really liked. Big Show should not be main eventing a PPV in 2012.

Well, I used to be back in early 90's. Back when Hulk Hogan, Ultimate Warrior, Big Bossman, Macho Man Randy Savage. and etc. Now, it just lame than hell. I try to watch but I just can't. Maybe I just getting older.

Now would be a good time to inject some life and bring back Taker.Dracula68

That'd be a good idea if they could inject some life back into Taker.

[QUOTE="Dracula68"]Now would be a good time to inject some life and bring back Taker.worlock77

That'd be a good idea if they could inject some life back into Taker.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Dracula68"]Now would be a good time to inject some life and bring back Taker.DeadMan1290

That'd be a good idea if they could inject some life back into Taker.

Still the most interesting character they have right now. Bring back Austin?

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Dracula68"]Now would be a good time to inject some life and bring back Taker.DeadMan1290

That'd be a good idea if they could inject some life back into Taker.

And it shows. Granted I don't watch regularly or follow it that closely anymore, but what I've seen of him the past couple of years he's looked pretty lifeless. It kinda seems like he's tired of it, but doesn't quite want to give up the money.

[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

That'd be a good idea if they could inject some life back into Taker.

Dracula68

Still the most interesting character they have right now. Bring back Austin?

That's not happening. His knees are shot.AmazonTreeBoa

I wasn't talking about him wrestling. Let's face facts...the best wrestlers are all old now.

Brock Lesnar is the only reason why I wanna watch WWE.m25105

[QUOTE="m25105"]Brock Lesnar is the only reason why I wanna watch WWE.Nuck81

it was a bore........i really wanna see HBK back .....m a big fan of HBK

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="m25105"]Brock Lesnar is the only reason why I wanna watch WWE.m25105

[QUOTE="m25105"][QUOTE="Nuck81"] They jobbed him to Cena in his first match back....Nuck81

Not sure that it "exposes" the business, but it's too slow paced for the average wrestling fan. And that's not a knock on wrestling fans. I dig both, but when I'm watching pro 'rasslin' I want to see action. I want to see people bouncing off the ropes, flying off turnbuckles and smacking each other in the head with folding chairs.

[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="m25105"] It was still fun to watch.worlock77

Not sure that it "exposes" the business, but it's too slow paced for the average wrestling fan. And that's not a knock on wrestling fans. I dig both, but when I'm watching pro 'rasslin' I want to see action. I want to see people bouncing off the ropes, flying off turnbuckles and smacking each other in the head with folding chairs.

[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

That'd be a good idea if they could inject some life back into Taker.

Dracula68

Still the most interesting character they have right now. Bring back Austin?

[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

That'd be a good idea if they could inject some life back into Taker.

worlock77

And it shows. Granted I don't watch regularly or follow it that closely anymore, but what I've seen of him the past couple of years he's looked pretty lifeless. It kinda seems like he's tired of it, but doesn't quite want to give up the money.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="Nuck81"] An MMA style doesn't work in pro wrestling. It exposes the business too greatly. Nuck81

Not sure that it "exposes" the business, but it's too slow paced for the average wrestling fan. And that's not a knock on wrestling fans. I dig both, but when I'm watching pro 'rasslin' I want to see action. I want to see people bouncing off the ropes, flying off turnbuckles and smacking each other in the head with folding chairs.

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"]

That's not happening. His knees are shot.Dracula68

I wasn't talking about him wrestling. Let's face facts...the best wrestlers are all old now.

Daniel Bryan and CM Punk are just as good as many of those old wrestlers were.

I love it , im sad Big Johnny is gone tho :( he was soo cool!! great heel and made raw and smackdown interesting, now we gotta deal with Teddy long , a FACE GM won't work out, AussieePet

Oh one more thing this Santino CRAP has to end, im sick and tried of these joke matches, Ryback needs to face someone in the WWE, im tried of his predictable 2 on 1 matches , im tried of funkasaus winning each match CMpunk defending tittle for 7 months and Shamus rarely loses , Cena is always in a big main event even tho i don't mind lol , but seriously sick of the joke matches with Santino !!AussieePet

[QUOTE="AussieePet"]I love it , im sad Big Johnny is gone tho :( he was soo cool!! great heel and made raw and smackdown interesting, now we gotta deal with Teddy long , a FACE GM won't work out, Ravensmash

[QUOTE="AussieePet"]Oh one more thing this Santino CRAP has to end, im sick and tried of these joke matches, Ryback needs to face someone in the WWE, im tried of his predictable 2 on 1 matches , im tried of funkasaus winning each match CMpunk defending tittle for 7 months and Shamus rarely loses , Cena is always in a big main event even tho i don't mind lol , but seriously sick of the joke matches with Santino !!DeadMan1290

[QUOTE="Dracula68"]

[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"]

That's not happening. His knees are shot.JML897

I wasn't talking about him wrestling. Let's face facts...the best wrestlers are all old now.

Daniel Bryan and CM Punk are just as good as many of those old wrestlers were.

[QUOTE="JML897"]

[QUOTE="Dracula68"]

I wasn't talking about him wrestling. Let's face facts...the best wrestlers are all old now.

Allicrombie

Daniel Bryan and CM Punk are just as good as many of those old wrestlers were.

Absolutely. In the ring Daniel Bryan is a better technical wrestler than Austin, Rock, Triple H, Foley, Hogan, Ultimate Warrior, or Undertaker ever were.

Austin and Rock were still inarguably more entertaining overall when they were in their prime but it seems like a lot of people take the whiny "it was so much better in the past" attitude way too often when it comes to wrestling. A lot of the guys today are vanilla but there are still some gems.

[QUOTE="Allicrombie"][QUOTE="JML897"]

Daniel Bryan and CM Punk are just as good as many of those old wrestlers were.

JML897

Absolutely. In the ring Daniel Bryan is a better technical wrestler than Austin, Rock, Triple H, Foley, Hogan, Ultimate Warrior, or Undertaker ever were.

Austin and Rock were still inarguably more entertaining overall when they were in their prime but it seems like a lot of people take the whiny "it was so much better in the past" attitude way too often when it comes to wrestling. A lot of the guys today are vanilla but there are still some gems.

Ziggler, CM Punk, Daniel Bryan are really entertaining wrestlers. Ziggler's selling is superb.Ravensmash

Totally agree. If people would take off their rose colored glasses they'd see that those three guys in particular really aren't any worse than the majority of people in the past.

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="AussieePet"]I love it , im sad Big Johnny is gone tho :( he was soo cool!! great heel and made raw and smackdown interesting, now we gotta deal with Teddy long , a FACE GM won't work out, AussieePet

Cena puts asses in the seats. Like it or not he's going to stay on top until he no longer puts asses in the seats.

[QUOTE="AussieePet"][QUOTE="Ravensmash"] hah, I agree. and f*ck this super cena business, so boring. OH LOOK HE'S OVERCAME THE ODDS YET AGAIN worlock77

Cena puts asses in the seats. Like it or not he's going to stay on top until he no longer puts asses in the seats.

They could at least act like the WWE Championship means something, though. Cena could still be in big feuds but put his match second to last on a PPV if he's not going for the belt.

I looked it up recently and the WWE Title has only been the main event at 1 of the last 8 PPVs. 1 of those was the Royal Rumble and the other 6 were John Cena non-title matches. Cena wasn't even on the show for the one PPV that the WWE Title main evented.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="AussieePet"] rofl yeah im tried of Cena over coming the ODDS every single time, even when Cena isn't champ he is still in the main events lol JML897

Cena puts asses in the seats. Like it or not he's going to stay on top until he no longer puts asses in the seats.

They could at least act like the WWE Championship means something, though. Cena could still be in big feuds but put his match second to last on a PPV if he's not going for the belt.

I looked it up recently and the WWE Title has only been the main event at 1 of the last 8 PPVs. 1 of those was the Royal Rumble and the other 6 were John Cena non-title matches. Cena wasn't even on the show for the one PPV that the WWE Title main evented.

Personally all their championships have felt meaningless for years. Ever since they came up with that lame roster split and multiple championships.

Personally all their championships have felt meaningless for years. Ever since they came up with that lame roster split and multiple championships.

worlock77

Despite what I just said I still think the WWE Title means a little bit. For the rest of them I totally agree with you. Belts like the US Championship and Intercontinental Championship are basically just "congrats, you're the best of the guys we don't really care about" and they haven't tried to have a good tag division in years either.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Personally all their championships have felt meaningless for years. Ever since they came up with that lame roster split and multiple championships.

JML897

Despite what I just said I still think the WWE Title means a little bit. For the rest of them I totally agree with you. Belts like the US Championship and Intercontinental Championship are basically just "congrats, you're the best of the guys we don't really care about" and they haven't tried to have a good tag division in years either.

[QUOTE="JML897"]

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Personally all their championships have felt meaningless for years. Ever since they came up with that lame roster split and multiple championships.

DeadMan1290

Despite what I just said I still think the WWE Title means a little bit. For the rest of them I totally agree with you. Belts like the US Championship and Intercontinental Championship are basically just "congrats, you're the best of the guys we don't really care about" and they haven't tried to have a good tag division in years either.

The WHC looks cooler but it's the belt for the B-show so it means next to nothing.

They're supposedly replacing the spinner belt soon but the belt that they're rumored to be replacing it with looks even worse. :(

[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"][QUOTE="JML897"]

Despite what I just said I still think the WWE Title means a little bit. For the rest of them I totally agree with you. Belts like the US Championship and Intercontinental Championship are basically just "congrats, you're the best of the guys we don't really care about" and they haven't tried to have a good tag division in years either.

JML897

The WHC looks cooler but it's the belt for the B-show so it means next to nothing.

They're supposedly replacing the spinner belt soon but the belt that they're rumored to be replacing it with looks even worse. :(

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

Personally all their championships have felt meaningless for years. Ever since they came up with that lame roster split and multiple championships.

JML897

Despite what I just said I still think the WWE Title means a little bit. For the rest of them I totally agree with you. Belts like the US Championship and Intercontinental Championship are basically just "congrats, you're the best of the guys we don't really care about" and they haven't tried to have a good tag division in years either.

Well the Intercontinental Championship use to mean a great deal as well. It was still, at one point, a prestigious title and the IC champion was automatically considered the #1 contender for the top title.

[QUOTE="DeadMan1290"][QUOTE="JML897"]

Despite what I just said I still think the WWE Title means a little bit. For the rest of them I totally agree with you. Belts like the US Championship and Intercontinental Championship are basically just "congrats, you're the best of the guys we don't really care about" and they haven't tried to have a good tag division in years either.

JML897

The WHC looks cooler but it's the belt for the B-show so it means next to nothing.

They're supposedly replacing the spinner belt soon but the belt that they're rumored to be replacing it with looks even worse. :(

Christ that's fugly.