[QUOTE="NumCha"]theres no proof in thatTheokhoth
Yes there is.
Youyou saying"yes there is" isnt proof!This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]What if those scientific advancements save more human life than they end? :oAbortion has nothing to do with science and embryonic stem cell research is obsolete. You were saying?
Scientific advancements should never, ever be made at the expense of human life. That's not religion; that's simple humanity.
Theokhoth
That won't matter much to the people science kills, now will it?
Well, it isn't this or the other way. I mean, science can help. Off-course there are worries about the use of science and ethics but the opposition of some religious people to it is just plain stubborness.The majority on this forum is probably 16-20. On your mid teens I think teeangers are strictly anti-religious, because that's a real age where you start rebelling against any association with your parents, and I think it's safe to say that the majority of the posters on this forum have religious parents.
I think it's on your late teen's that you blossom out of that whole thing. That's when you really start to respect your parents, and to find the reason behind religion. I think a good portion of the posters on these boards are within this line of thinking.
I have little doubt that with age, the majority of this forum will become religious, but it's kinda obvious pointing that out since most of the world is religious, but whatev.
[QUOTE="lucky326"]It ruins productivity and the human race thats why.NumChaSooo true Both of you I can't take seriously. One is a rebel, the other doesnt know what he even said. Well I guess you are easily manipulated by what your family does or says. You laugh at the Christian religion because your family are extremist? So I see it as a form of rebellion because you disagree with what your parents have tought you yet you point the finger at the teachings of Christianity. I can't take you seriously at all as a theist, or atheist. lucky326 needs to pick up a history book. Many cultures to this day have risen on the foundations of belief and religion, even today, most of our Ivy league schools (Harvard, Yale, Colombia, etc) were actually religious facilities in the 18th and early 19th century but sought out to seek higher education and established themselves as education facilities. I dont know how that ruins productivity. You later complain that theist are throwing the the holy book at stem cell research? Thats human moral and value, not just religion. You dont have to be a Christian to oppose stem cell and abortion debate. Its a complicated debate to begin with.
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="NumCha"]theres no proof in thatNumCha
Yes there is.
Youyou saying"yes there is" isnt proof!There is a link there. >__>[QUOTE="Teenaged"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]The Legend of Zelda. :P
Theokhoth
What??? Anyway I'll stop this fight because there will be too much blood and we will stain the people in this thread.
You know how in Zelda games, the chickens will beat the living hell out of you if you attack one enough times?
I only played Zelda in Game Boy Colour! Anyway...You later complain that theist are throwing the the holy book at stem cell research? Thats human moral and value, not just religion. You dont have to be a Christian to oppose stem cell and abortion debate. Its a complicated debate to begin with.Kamekazi_69He never said that Christians were the only people opposing stem cell research and abortion.
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]What??? Anyway I'll stop this fight because there will be too much blood and we will stain the people in this thread.
Teenaged
You know how in Zelda games, the chickens will beat the living hell out of you if you attack one enough times?
I only played Zelda in Game Boy Colour! Anyway...They do it in GBC, too, I think. :P
[QUOTE="Teenaged"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]The Legend of Zelda. :P
Theokhoth
What??? Anyway I'll stop this fight because there will be too much blood and we will stain the people in this thread.
You know how in Zelda games, the chickens will beat the living hell out of you if you attack one enough times?
Dear God, that was so stunningly obscure. :shock:[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]You later complain that theist are throwing the the holy book at stem cell research? Thats human moral and value, not just religion. You dont have to be a Christian to oppose stem cell and abortion debate. Its a complicated debate to begin with.Funky_LlamaHe never said that Christians were the only people opposing stem cell research and abortion.
He referred specificly to religious people and their opposition to stem cells and abortion in the context of "how religion holds humanity back."
[QUOTE="Teenaged"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]I only played Zelda in Game Boy Colour! Anyway...You know how in Zelda games, the chickens will beat the living hell out of you if you attack one enough times?
Theokhoth
They do it in GBC, too, I think. :P
And in Link to the Past.[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]What??? Anyway I'll stop this fight because there will be too much blood and we will stain the people in this thread.
Funky_Llama
You know how in Zelda games, the chickens will beat the living hell out of you if you attack one enough times?
Dear God, that was so stunningly obscure. :shock:. . . . Giggity. >_>
You're right about that. But think: Why do teenagers seek answers? Because they want to know why. Why do grown ups don't? Because they reached a point in their lives where inner search and existential worries come second, after their job, family and social environment. Then is the time when religion will comfort them because they have given up wondering long ago and any trouble about doubting religion is consuming and is distracting them from being like everybody else.The majority on this forum is probably 16-20. On your mid teens I think teeangers are strictly anti-religious, because that's a real age where you start rebelling against any association with your parents, and I think it's safe to say that the majority of the posters on this forum have religious parents.
I think it's on your late teen's that you blossom out of that whole thing. That's when you really start to respect your parents, and to find the reason behind religion. I think a good portion of the posters on these boards are within this line of thinking.
I have little doubt that with age, the majority of this forum will become religious, but it's kinda obvious pointing that out since most of the world is religious, but whatev.
Siofen
I don't want to sound stereotypical or absolute but that's my... theory. I may be proved wrong but I tend to believe that the clearest state of mind is with very little children. As we grow up we loose that slowly.
He never said that Christians were the only people opposing stem cell research and abortion.[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"]You later complain that theist are throwing the the holy book at stem cell research? Thats human moral and value, not just religion. You dont have to be a Christian to oppose stem cell and abortion debate. Its a complicated debate to begin with.Theokhoth
He referred specificly to religious people and their opposition to stem cells and abortion in the context of "how religion holds humanity back."
I know. And, again, that doesn't imply that religious people are the only ones opposing it.[QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]What??? Anyway I'll stop this fight because there will be too much blood and we will stain the people in this thread.
Funky_Llama
You know how in Zelda games, the chickens will beat the living hell out of you if you attack one enough times?
Dear God, that was so stunningly obscure. :shock:I'm sad to say that I got the reference immediately. :P
I always hear so many people here say rude things about Christians or Catholics.
Alright first of all, I am a catholic, so are my parents. We never have tried to convert anyone.
We never act like we are better then anyone, we never tell others they are going to hell if they swear or something.So will atheists hate me just because I am a catholic??
I have a friend who is an atheist and he called me a retard because I am catholic.
So I am retarded because I am a catholic??
Should I be an atheist just because everyone tells me to be one??joshrocks2245
in my city most people is catholic, and im an atheist. i recommend you to ignore the people who discriminates you. my english not good
But this generation could simply turn out to be much less religious than the last. Plus, there are plenty here from Europe, which contains countries in which religious people are a minority.The majority on this forum is probably 16-20. On your mid teens I think teeangers are strictly anti-religious, because that's a real age where you start rebelling against any association with your parents, and I think it's safe to say that the majority of the posters on this forum have religious parents.
I think it's on your late teen's that you blossom out of that whole thing. That's when you really start to respect your parents, and to find the reason behind religion. I think a good portion of the posters on these boards are within this line of thinking.
I have little doubt that with age, the majority of this forum will become religious, but it's kinda obvious pointing that out since most of the world is religious, but whatev.
Siofen
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]Dear God, that was so stunningly obscure. :shock:You know how in Zelda games, the chickens will beat the living hell out of you if you attack one enough times?
GabuEx
I'm sad to say that I got the reference immediately. :P
I'm not sure whether to pity you or be impressed. :PHe never said that Christians were the only people opposing stem cell research and abortion.Funky_Llama
He referred specificly to religious people and their opposition to stem cells and abortion in the context of "how religion holds humanity back."
I know. And, again, that doesn't imply that religious people are the only ones opposing it. "yes however alot of scientific research is crippled and could go soo much further if it wasnt for thpose pesky poreotesting christians always complaining that no one except for god has the right to take a human life, ie abortion, stem cell research" -NumCha Straight from the horses mouth. What can I summarize from this statement? that christians are a burden to the research of Stem Cell and abortion. It sounds different to me. Then next time, he shouldnt individualize a certain belief to the problem of a national debate when 300 million citizens have different opinions.[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]I know. And, again, that doesn't imply that religious people are the only ones opposing it. "yes however alot of scientific research is crippled and could go soo much further if it wasnt for thpose pesky poreotesting christians always complaining that no one except for god has the right to take a human life, ie abortion, stem cell research" -NumCha Straight from the horses mouth. What can I summarize from this statement? that christians are a burden to the research of Stem Cell and abortion. It sounds different to me. Then next time, he shouldnt individualize a certain belief to the problem of a national debate when 300 million citizens have different opinions.:roll: Again, contrary to your argument's implication, he never claimed that Christians are the only people opposing it.He referred specificly to religious people and their opposition to stem cells and abortion in the context of "how religion holds humanity back."
Kamekazi_69
[QUOTE="Kamekazi_69"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]I know. And, again, that doesn't imply that religious people are the only ones opposing it.Funky_Llama"yes however alot of scientific research is crippled and could go soo much further if it wasnt for thpose pesky poreotesting christians always complaining that no one except for god has the right to take a human life, ie abortion, stem cell research" -NumCha Straight from the horses mouth. What can I summarize from this statement? that christians are a burden to the research of Stem Cell and abortion. It sounds different to me. Then next time, he shouldnt individualize a certain belief to the problem of a national debate when 300 million citizens have different opinions.:roll: Again, contrary to your argument's implication, he never claimed that Christians are the only people opposing it. Like I said before, I dont take him serious, so take it more as me reinforcing the idea that each person has different morality
I'ma a Catholic too :)cyberdarkkid
Do you enjoy posting in the OT though?
I actually hate it, thats why the past few months I haven't posted here much but the past few days I have been.
It's been a mistake though, I've only been angry because of all the religion bashing that has been going on.
If someone bashed religions like that in real, that person wouldn't have any friends.
I hate organized religion because it blinds people to logic and reason. There are plenty of people who can compromise their religion with science and logic but far too many remain wholly ignorant to actual reality. Personal beliefs are fine... but Voltaire put it best: "As long as people continue to believe in absurdities, they will continue to commit atrocities."
I constantly fantasize about fictional things... but I don't let those myths run my life.
foxhound_fox
Alright give me proof that God is fictional.
So the universe wasn't made from God, it just appeared out of no where??
All the planets and everything in the world just came out of no where??
I dont hate religions, I just hate the people who throw their own believes down your throat and try to trun you into them.GTA_dude
Can you please give me proof of Christians or Catholics who do this??
It's not usually them, usually it's other weird religions.
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]I hate organized religion because it blinds people to logic and reason. There are plenty of people who can compromise their religion with science and logic but far too many remain wholly ignorant to actual reality. Personal beliefs are fine... but Voltaire put it best: "As long as people continue to believe in absurdities, they will continue to commit atrocities."
I constantly fantasize about fictional things... but I don't let those myths run my life.
joshrocks2245
Alright give me proof that God is fictional.
So the universe wasn't made from God, it just appeared out of no where??
All the planets and everything in the world just came out of no where??
[QUOTE="GTA_dude"]I dont hate religions, I just hate the people who throw their own believes down your throat and try to trun you into them.joshrocks2245
Can you please give me proof of Christians or Catholics who do this??
It's not usually them, usually it's other weird religions.
[QUOTE="joshrocks2245"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]I hate organized religion because it blinds people to logic and reason. There are plenty of people who can compromise their religion with science and logic but far too many remain wholly ignorant to actual reality. Personal beliefs are fine... but Voltaire put it best: "As long as people continue to believe in absurdities, they will continue to commit atrocities."
I constantly fantasize about fictional things... but I don't let those myths run my life.
Vandalvideo
Alright give me proof that God is fictional.
So the universe wasn't made from God, it just appeared out of no where??
All the planets and everything in the world just came out of no where??
It's not blind acceptance, it's proof.
Theres proof of God, theres proof of Jesus, the bible is real.
No no everyone says God is fictional who is not religious, but he is not fictional.
How did everything get on earth without God??
Everything just appeared??
I don't get how everything could just appear without a creator.
Please explain to me how everything got on this earth.
Also explain to me how every single planet appeared in the universe without a creator.
Religion hampers the advancement of science by their blind acceptance of faith running contrary to logic and reason. Vandalvideo
What is logic and reason? What advancements of science does religion hamper? How does religion accept anything?
Blind faith does not exist. There simply is no such thing as blind faith in anything, God or otherwise.
It's not blind acceptance, it's proof.Theres proof of God, theres proof of Jesus, the bible is real.No no everyone says God is fictional who is not religious, but he is not fictional.How did everything get on earth without God??Everything just appeared?? don't get how everything could just appear without a creator. Please explain to me how everything got on this earth. Also explain to me how every single planet appeared in the universe without a creator. joshrocks2245You're arguing in a cartesian fallacy. You're saying that because we are here, and we don't know how we got here, that is proof of god. Sorry, but that is not proof of god. Our lack of understanding is not proof of a higher power. Man used to not understand that lightening was made from natural phenomenon, and attributed it to the existance of some extra terristrial being. You can't pretend ignorance is proof of god's existance.
What is logic and reason? What advancements of science does religion hamper? How does religion accept anything? Blind faith does not exist. There simply is no such thing as blind faith in anything, God or otherwise.TheokhothLogic and reason are directly contrary to faith as an absurdity. It is the belief in things not otherwise perceived through evidence.Religion has a long history of holding back the sciences in areas such as astrology and now stem cell research. Religion cannot handle things that may threaten their status quo, so they declare it heretic.
Logic and reason are directly contrary to faith as an absurdity.1 It is the belief in things not otherwise perceived through evidence.2 Religion has a long history of holding back the sciences in areas such as astrology and now stem cell research.3 Religion cannot handle things that may threaten their status quo, so they declare it heretic.4Vandalvideo
1. That doesn't answer the question.
2. Again, no such thing.
3. Religion hasn't held back stem cell research; only embryonic stem cell research, which is obsolete. And again, you never answered the question.
4. That goes for every established normalcy in existence.
[QUOTE="joshrocks2245"]It's not blind acceptance, it's proof.Theres proof of God, theres proof of Jesus, the bible is real.No no everyone says God is fictional who is not religious, but he is not fictional.How did everything get on earth without God??Everything just appeared?? don't get how everything could just appear without a creator. Please explain to me how everything got on this earth. Also explain to me how every single planet appeared in the universe without a creator. VandalvideoYou're arguing in a cartesian fallacy. You're saying that because we are here, and we don't know how we got here, that is proof of god. Sorry, but that is not proof of god. Our lack of understanding is not proof of a higher power. Man used to not understand that lightening was made from natural phenomenon, and attributed it to the existance of some extra terristrial being. You can't pretend ignorance is proof of god's existance.
We don't know how we got here? There is no proof of God? :|
There is proof of God, and we may not know how we got here but it had to be by a creator.
Let me explain this to you. You really think the universe just popped out of no where??
All of the sudden, everything was created by nothing??
It is impossible for nothing to create something, so yes something did create everything because that is the only way it can be.
Because religion is annoying.Bloodbath_87
Religion is annoying??
The religion bashers aren't annoying??
1. That doesn't answer the question.TheokhothOf course it answers the question. Logic and reasoning are a contrast between faith. It is the acceptance with or without evidence of things.
No such thing? What about the persecution of Gallileo for Helicentrism? The church practically held his ideas hostage at the end of a sword!2. Again, no such thing.
Stem cell research qua stem cell research. Holding back science for your own moralistic tendencies is opression.3. Religion hasn't held back stem cell research; only embryonic stem cell research, which is obsolete.
We don't know how we got here? There is no proof of God? :|There is proof of God, and we may not know how we got here but it had to be by a creator.Let me explain this to you. You really think the universe just popped out of no where??All of the sudden, everything was created by nothing??It is impossible for nothing to create something, so yes something did create everything because that is the only way it can be. joshrocks2245How do you KNOW that it is impossible to create nothing out of something? Newton was smart, but even he is not infallible. Science is an evolving entity, constantly correcting itself as new observations are being made. Newton's law of preservation of mass may be obsolete one day. Besides, you are still relying on a Cartesian Fallacy. You think that, because we did not pop out of nowhere, then god exists. Prove that we did not pop out of nowhere if you want to make such claims.
Of course it answers the question. Logic and reasoning are a contrast between faith. It is the acceptance with or without evidence of things.1 No such thing? What about the persecution of Gallileo for Helicentrism? The church practically held his ideas hostage at the end of a sword!2 Stem cell research qua stem cell research. Holding back science for your own moralistic tendencies is opression.3Vandalvideo
1. No, it doesn't. You're telling me what logic and reason isn't, but you're saying nothing about what it is.
2. That isn't blind faith, and Galileo was persecuted for stepping out of his authority with the Pope, not for his heliocentric findings. You still haven't answered the second question.
3. Killing humans for the advancement of science is oppression. Hence the opposition to embryonic stem cell research. However, adult stem cell research works better, making embryonic stem cell research, and the controversies surrounding it, obsolete. Science is not an authority and should never, ever, be treated as such.
1. No, it doesn't. You're telling me what logic and reason isn't, but you're saying nothing about what it is.TheokhothThe only way to establish what logic and reason are is to examine what it isn't. There is a dichotomy between logic/reason and faith.
Galileo was FORCEd at the end of a sword to renounce his own beliefs because it went against the status quo and the church. Heliocentrism was OPPRESSED by the church. That is a fact.2. That isn't blind faith, and Galileo was persecuted for stepping out of his authority with the Pope, not for his heliocentric findings. You still haven't answered the second question.
By law, they are not humans. They do not have the basic functional capacities under law to constitute persons, and are not offorded the protections of humans. You're relying on a definition of human from religious tenents.3. Killing humans for the advancement of science is oppression. Hence the opposition to embryonic stem cell research. However, adult stem cell research works better, making embryonic stem cell research, and the controversies surrounding it, obsolete. Science is not an authority and should never, ever, be treated as such.
Stem cell research qua stem cell research. Holding back science for your own moralistic tendencies is opression.Vandalvideo
If you believe that some procedure is causing the deaths of innocent human lives, would it not be morally treasonable not to speak out against it?
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Stem cell research qua stem cell research. Holding back science for your own moralistic tendencies is opression.GabuEx
If you believe that some procedure is causing the deaths of innocent human lives, would it not be morally treasonable not to speak out against it?
Aaaaand belief is the problem that we're discussing here as opposed to logic and reason. Belief holds no place in the realm of law, science, and man.[QUOTE="joshrocks2245"]We don't know how we got here? There is no proof of God? :|There is proof of God, and we may not know how we got here but it had to be by a creator.Let me explain this to you. You really think the universe just popped out of no where??All of the sudden, everything was created by nothing??It is impossible for nothing to create something, so yes something did create everything because that is the only way it can be. VandalvideoHow do you KNOW that it is impossible to create nothing out of something? Newton was smart, but even he is not infallible. Science is an evolving entity, constantly correcting itself as new observations are being made. Newton's law of preservation of mass may be obsolete one day. Besides, you are still relying on a Cartesian Fallacy. You think that, because we did not pop out of nowhere, then god exists. Prove that we did not pop out of nowhere if you want to make such claims.
Well I have proof God exists, so I am not just saying he exists because we popped out of no where.
But you really think we could pop out of no where with no creator? You honestly think everything on this earth wasn't created by a higher power and it just appeared here? :|
The only way to establish what logic and reason are is to examine what it isn't.1 There is a dichotomy between logic/reason and faith.2 Galileo was FORCEd at the end of a sword to renounce his own beliefs because it went against the status quo and the church.3 Heliocentrism was OPPRESSED by the church. That is a fact.4 By law, they are not humans.5 They do not have the basic functional capacities under law to constitute persons, and are not offorded the protections of humans. You're relying on a definition of human from religious tenentsVandalvideo
1. No it is not. I'm giving you one last chance: Tell me what logic and reason are or this discussion is over.
2. Yet you still haven't established what logic/reason is or what faith is.
3. Galileo was forced to do so because after stepping out of line, his findings could not be accepted. The Church ACCEPTED heliocentricism before they condemned Galileo, and THAT is the fact.
4. The law is wrong and unjust, and like any other wrong and unjust law, should be opposed. By biology they are human.
5. I don't have to be religious to consider them humans. Relying on an unjust law to establish the moral rightness of an action is faulty.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment