Who do you think the media has been more harsh on overall? Trump or Hillary?

Lol. Talk about non-sequitoir.

Back to what he actually said, no one should be surprised at this, since this heavy use of cuckold usage is most likely just another case of Haggard's Law (albeit for interracial stuff instead of homosexuality).

Edit: And look and behold. People with a strong opposition to what they oppose oftentimes have what they obsessively dislike.

http://web.archive.org/web/20040202035152/www.apa.org/releases/homophob.html
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120406234458.htm

If left winger beta males, are so weak powerless and pathetic, what does that make far righters? Who are getting utterly destroyed in the world of politics and ideas. So they stick to their online circlejerks and cry about being persecuted for their childish views?

And really beta males? Did I go back to middle/high school?

No wonder you guys are sometimes seen as nothing more than Barbarians.

What? No lol. Cuck in the right-wing concept is used by far right individuals to describe conservatives who aren't right enough. Hence the term "cuckservative".

@Maroxad: How are they getting destroyed actually? Let's take a look around the world. Angela Merkel is on her way out, Brittan exited the Eu and Hillary lead is back to what it was three months ago.

And you accuse us of crying? While you constantly bitch about inequalities for blacks, LGBT rights etc? The far left have become professional victims and all you have for a comeback is..I know you are but what am I?

@Aljosa23: You're half right. A cuck is used to to describe those on the far left a cuckservative is used to describe those that claim to be conservative but are not considered conservative enough.

The Brexit is in full damage control, and is practically a sinking ship. Angela Merkel may be on her way out but that is one incident, and Hillary? Hillary's lead is greater than it was 3 months ago, 3 months ago she had a 2 point lead, now she has a 3.3 point lead. Meanwhile, Trump is going through staffers like he goes through his adult diapers.

Asking to not treat LGBT people as second class citizens is crying? Trying to stop costly bills that achieve nothing is crying (transgender bathroom bill)? Stop strawmanning. Campaigning is not crying. Are you even aware of the christian persecution complex, and how abundant it is amongst the far right?

Edit: And now you are playing the victim card too with Global Warming Denialism. As shown in that other thread. Even in this thread, there were a few people arguing that the media was unfairly biased to Trump. Dont even deny the victim playing amonsgst the far right. These are things I have heard far too often

• "Liberal Media"
• "Hollywood is too liberal"
• "Liberal Elite"
• "Liberal Academia"
• "Wikipedia has a liberal bias"
• "Google has a Liberal Bias"
• "War on Christmas"

And of course, "GameSpot is too liberal". The crying from the Rainbow Gamespot put on their logo after Obergefell vs Hodges was hilarious and sad at the same time.

@Maroxad: Hillary's lead has been cut in half according to CNN. That was as of yesterday.

Angela Merkel has ruined Germany and Hillary wants to do virtually the same thing with the US. (But why learn from others mistakes let's try it ourselves like it's somehow going to be better). Brexit just started nobody said it would be easy but it's happening for a reason and I don't blame them.

Meanwhile the fact you think the LGBT community are treated like second class citizens shows my point. Constant victim complex from the far left.

And somehow acknowledging most media outlets are extremely left wing is being a victim? So tell me.. do you think CNN and MSNBC are objective media outlets? Do you believe colleges don't lean to the far left? Those are factual observations nobody is claiming to be a victim unless your the poor bastard who lost his job at Mizzou over a poop swastika for no reason.

@AM-Gamer: lo fucking l

@AM-Gamer: Actually correct that *Trump is currently leading now. According to CNN. Wow, how shit changes.

@Maroxad: Actually correct that *Trump is currently leading now. According to CNN. Wow, how shit changes

That is one poll,

Wake me up when Hillary as an aggregrate lead.

@Maroxad: The same poll that had Hillary up by nearly 8% three months ago.

Again, only one poll.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

These are your baseless opinions, not "factual observations".

Referring to Hillary as "far left" is a complete joke, and only goes to show how out-of-touch the alt-right is with reality.

Bernie is far left. Hillary is center. The media is center. So the media will favour Hillary, because she's center like them. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

But of course, to the alt-right, everything that isn't to the far right, is automatically "far left" for them. They even slam moderate right-wingers as "cuckservatives" for fock's sake. To the alt-right, they thing of everything in extremes, like the extremists they are.

@Jag85: What exactly is a baseless opionion? Angela Merkel is on her way out because she managed to ruin the country. The UK decided to exit for a reason so what exactly is opinion there? Hillary is not in the center and this is what typical radical leftwingers like yourself do.. just assume everyone against you is a radical right winger. MSNBC and CNN push the same BLM agenda, they cut tape when a black man was speaking positive about Trump, they gave Pierce Morgan who is a radical gun control advocate his own show. This is what you consider the center?

I am pro choice and believe in the legalization of Marijuana so that technically excludes me from the far right.

God, I hate shoehorning everything into a left/right spectrum.

I guess that means Bernie Sanders is a centrist because he's pro gun rights?

@mattbbpl: Except he's not really pro gun rights. If it wasn't for hunting he wanted it banned.

@mattbbpl: Except he's not really pro gun rights. If it wasn't for hunting he wanted it banned.

How did I miss this gold nugget. At the time of posting this, Hillary's lead is NOT cut in half. Using one poll as opposed to the aggregrate is delusional, and while Trump had the lead in that one poll, guess who leads in the rest?

Angela Merkel ruined germany? Last I checked, Germany is still a highly wealthy state, and its GDP per Capita has still been growing. Usually major political events enter a period of a political honeymoon. This didnt. Brexit was a disaster, and world leaders worldwide, academics and intellectuals have been warning against the consequences. Face it, Brexit is a sinking ship. And the fact that the Brexit leaders had to lie to get their point across shows how dishonest they were.

But the LGBT community were. With politicians trying to pass bills preventing them from entering their bathroom of choice, preventing them from joining the military, and denying them their right to get married is treating them like second class citizens. While they no longer are second class citizens in the US, they are treated like second class citizens elsewhere, where they may get murdered or executed by an overly religious government.

You have no basis on most media outlets being far left. The fact is, CNN aint objective but it doesnt suffer from far leftism, instead CNN suffers from neutrality complex. CNN have been very kind to Hillary, but she is an obvious centrist. Look at how the news media treated an actual far left candidate like Bernie Sanders. They were trying to smear him at every opportunity, trying to bring down his reputation for absolutely childish reasons like being an atheist (how dare he). Now, while you used 2 anecdotes (of which one is completely false), look at how much Hillary gets bashed for childish issues like her health. Compare this to trump who has been given the kid's gloves by the media. Why is it that I often have to look in academic journals or the new media to find legimate criticism of Trump? Why is it so rare for the media to look at trump's financial policies and tell how they wont work and will plunge the country in a much greater debt than the entire world. As for the academia, there is no denial that the majority of academics are liberal, but there is a good reason for that, the majority of the intellectual community is liberal, no conspiracy here.

In fact, the left academics can easily be explained.

1. The more educated a person becomes, the more the person has to think. Universities especially Ph.Ds require critical thinking skills to survive. The better your critical thinking skills, the less of a grasp dogmatic concepts, such as authoritarianism and tradition will have on you. Traditional values are getting weeded out by society, because a lot of them lack merit and dont stand up to scrutiny.
2. Right wingers are more likely to go after high salaries and private institutions as opposed to worse paying public institutes. A lot of these people do have the advancement to move up to private institutes, but they dont, because in government buildings they have greater academic freedom.
3. Many professors and teachers are union employees as well as government workers. Who naturally have a greater affinity for economic left wing ideals.
4. Highest quintile intelligence is strongly associated with prosocial beliefs and left leaining ideals. It is no coincidence that liberals dominate the educated and the high IQ demographics. This is not exclusive to the US either, and is a worldwide phenomenon. Since the highest quintile intelligence is EXTREMELY common amongst academics, its no surprise that when a majority group of the people who get in happen to be liberal. Hell, this is probably why the Ivy League has an even greater ammount of liberals than even the rest of the universities.

Likewise, there is no conspiracy either that the majority of police officers and people in the military are conservative.

Stay delusional. Everything that isn't far right to you is left wing (hence why you errendously called CNN far left wing). I have seen this fallacious thinking before, and it is pretty common amongst the alt right and far right.

And the No True Scotsman rears it's head.

Is this a serious question? No doubt Trump, but in a strange way, I feel sorry for him! But at the same time, when he opens his mouth, he makes it really easy for them.

Trump is basically how I was in middle-early high school. I went under a lot of scrutiny and criticism. But looking back, I think I deserved ALL of it. But with Trump, he is given the kid gloves. You would be amazed at just how much shit he gets away with from the media while the media is trying to dig up all these ancient hillary scandals.

My hypothesis for this is that Hillary Scandals simply put sell much more headlines and leads to more clicks than Trump scandals. Not to mention, the "Liberal Bias" narrative that the media is hellbent on avoiding.

No way. Using his most recent statements as an example, imagine a Democratic presidential nominee had said that Putin was a better leader than the president of the US. You can't honestly claim that that would go poorly, right?

Nice explanation. There's way too much anti-education nonsense among the alt-right these days, with crazy conspiracies about higher-education institutions brainwashing people to become liberals. When the alt-right come up with nonsense like that, it's no wonder they're not so educated, like a feedback loop.

DNC leaks already showed that Hillary is backed by the majority of the media.

So with that in thought, it's Trump. He deserves it though, and I think they aren't harder on him when it comes to other outrageous things he's said in the past.

Yup, its anti intellectualism in a nutshell.

Have you ever visited the site that shall not be named? Man, even on video game discussions, they hold higher education and academics in a very negative light, even in non political discussions. Not surprising, considering how seemingly so few even knew basic calculus.

All of these polls are a circlejerk. They mean nothing. I remember Romney ahead in many polls up until like a week before the election. I remember Mccain getting real close to Obama's numbers in 08, and we all know how that turned out. I simply do not see Donald Trump appealing to hardly any demographics, seeing how he has outright insulted so many of them. Hilary is a snake, for sure, but she is a tiny bit better at hiding her tail, and has at least enough foresight to not blurt out everything in her head to people who could forget most of their knowledge on a subject, and still know more than him.