Thankfully there is a full NFL season, but now we ask the big question of the Super Bowl. Personally i think that the AFC champ will be
Patriots against the NFC champ Saints. Patroits win 24-10
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Thankfully there is a full NFL season, but now we ask the big question of the Super Bowl. Personally i think that the AFC champ will be
Patriots against the NFC champ Saints. Patroits win 24-10
An AFC team vs aNFC team with a NFL team winning. You can quote me on that.
sherman-tank1
r u liek g0d or sumthing?
Packers with the repeat. Can't stop Clay Matthews and Aaron Rodgers man.VuurkThis. If they can't stop Matthews when he has a busted wheel how do they expect to stop him when he's healthy? DPoY candidate (without getting screwed this time) for sure.
Obviously you can since they went 10-6 during the season and not 19-0. To be fair some of those loses were without Rodgers.[QUOTE="Vuurk"]Packers with the repeat. Can't stop Clay Matthews and Aaron Rodgers man.Pirate700
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]Obviously you can since they went 10-6 during the season and not 19-0. To be fair some of those loses were without Rodgers.One of them was. Regardless, I'm picking them for the NFC championship game at least.[QUOTE="Vuurk"]Packers with the repeat. Can't stop Clay Matthews and Aaron Rodgers man.The-Apostle
AFC Championship Game: Chargers(h) Vs Patriots(a)-- Chargers win on the last play of the game with a field goal. 27-24 NFC Championship Game: Eagles(a) Vs Packers(h) -- Eagles storm into Green Bay and upset the Packers 35-17 Superbowl: Chargers 24 Eagles 28UniverseIX
I really don't think the Eagles are going to be all they're hyped up to be this season. Definitely playoffs but not SB caliber.
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"]AFC Championship Game: Chargers(h) Vs Patriots(a)-- Chargers win on the last play of the game with a field goal. 27-24 NFC Championship Game: Eagles(a) Vs Packers(h) -- Eagles storm into Green Bay and upset the Packers 35-17 Superbowl: Chargers 24 Eagles 28Pirate700
I really don't think the Eagles are going to be all they're hyped up to be this season. Definitely playoffs but not SB caliber.
The eagles are going to have the #1 ranked offense in the NFL this season. Even if Vick's not on the field. And their defense will be top 10.[QUOTE="Pirate700"][QUOTE="UniverseIX"]AFC Championship Game: Chargers(h) Vs Patriots(a)-- Chargers win on the last play of the game with a field goal. 27-24 NFC Championship Game: Eagles(a) Vs Packers(h) -- Eagles storm into Green Bay and upset the Packers 35-17 Superbowl: Chargers 24 Eagles 28UniverseIX
I really don't think the Eagles are going to be all they're hyped up to be this season. Definitely playoffs but not SB caliber.
The eagles are going to have the #1 ranked offense in the NFL this season. Even if Vick's not on the field. And their defense will be top 10.If you say so. They looked like complete garbage in the preseason.The eagles are going to have the #1 ranked offense in the NFL this season. Even if Vick's not on the field. And their defense will be top 10.If you say so. They looked like complete garbage in the preseason. what preseason were you watching? That's not the impression I got at all. They finished 3-1 and their first team offense had really good stats.[QUOTE="UniverseIX"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]
I really don't think the Eagles are going to be all they're hyped up to be this season. Definitely playoffs but not SB caliber.
Pirate700
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]If you say so. They looked like complete garbage in the preseason. what preseason were you watching? That's not the impression I got at all. They finished 3-1 and their first team offense had really good stats.The same preseason everyone else saw. The Eagles starting offense looked like crap and it's been all over ESPN also.[QUOTE="UniverseIX"] The eagles are going to have the #1 ranked offense in the NFL this season. Even if Vick's not on the field. And their defense will be top 10.UniverseIX
what preseason were you watching? That's not the impression I got at all. They finished 3-1 and their first team offense had really good stats.The same preseason everyone else saw. The Eagles starting offense looked like crap and it's been all over ESPN also. that was one game against the steelers D :o without their starting WR's jackson or maclin.[QUOTE="UniverseIX"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]If you say so. They looked like complete garbage in the preseason.
Pirate700
[QUOTE="Pirate700"]If you say so. They looked like complete garbage in the preseason. what preseason were you watching? That's not the impression I got at all. They finished 3-1 and their first team offense had really good stats. Vick: COMP/ATT: 19/36 (52%) TD: 1 INT: 3 Yeah, vick blew hard.[QUOTE="UniverseIX"] The eagles are going to have the #1 ranked offense in the NFL this season. Even if Vick's not on the field. And their defense will be top 10.UniverseIX
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]If you say so. They looked like complete garbage in the preseason.what preseason were you watching? That's not the impression I got at all. They finished 3-1 and their first team offense had really good stats. Vick: COMP/ATT: 19/36 (52%) TD: 1 INT: 3 Yeah, vick blew hard.Yep. Looks like Vick may be reverting back to crappy ATL Vick.DroidPhysX
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"][QUOTE="Pirate700"]If you say so. They looked like complete garbage in the preseason.what preseason were you watching? That's not the impression I got at all. They finished 3-1 and their first team offense had really good stats. Vick: COMP/ATT: 19/36 (52%) TD: 1 INT: 3 Yeah, vick blew hard. One game, against a great defense. IT's good to get these things corrected during the preseason so they're ready for it in the season. This is much better for them than if they had dominated every game in the pre season.DroidPhysX
Vick: COMP/ATT: 19/36 (52%) TD: 1 INT: 3 Yeah, vick blew hard. One game, against a great defense. IT's good to get these things corrected during the preseason so they're ready for it in the season. This is much better for them than if they had dominated every game in the pre season. That was his stats for the whole pre-season. :|[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="UniverseIX"] what preseason were you watching? That's not the impression I got at all. They finished 3-1 and their first team offense had really good stats.UniverseIX
Vick: COMP/ATT: 19/36 (52%) TD: 1 INT: 3 Yeah, vick blew hard. One game, against a great defense. IT's good to get these things corrected during the preseason so they're ready for it in the season. This is much better for them than if they had dominated every game in the pre season.He was horrid all preseason...[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="UniverseIX"] what preseason were you watching? That's not the impression I got at all. They finished 3-1 and their first team offense had really good stats.UniverseIX
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"]One game, against a great defense. IT's good to get these things corrected during the preseason so they're ready for it in the season. This is much better for them than if they had dominated every game in the pre season. That was his stats for the whole pre-season. :| He only played 3 games . All of his picks came against the steelers considering that in his other 2 games he played he was 14/24 and a TD with limited playing time in both of those games. Isn't a poor pre season.[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Vick: COMP/ATT: 19/36 (52%) TD: 1 INT: 3 Yeah, vick blew hard.DroidPhysX
That was his stats for the whole pre-season. :| He only played 3 games . All of his picks came against the steelers considering that in his other 2 games he played he was 14/24 and a TD with limited playing time in both of those games. Isn't a poor pre season.[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="UniverseIX"] One game, against a great defense. IT's good to get these things corrected during the preseason so they're ready for it in the season. This is much better for them than if they had dominated every game in the pre season.
UniverseIX
If we discounted the Super Bowl, the Patritos really did go undefeated.
He only played 3 games . All of his picks came against the steelers considering that in his other 2 games he played he was 14/24 and a TD with limited playing time in both of those games. Isn't a poor pre season.[QUOTE="UniverseIX"]
[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] That was his stats for the whole pre-season. :|DroidPhysX
If we discounted the Super Bowl, the Patritos really did go undefeated.
were talking about individual players stats, not w/l ratio of teams. Vick was 2-1 in the preseason with one really bad game against the steelers. Does that mean he had a terrible preseason because he played one bad game? I don't think so.[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
[QUOTE="UniverseIX"] He only played 3 games . All of his picks came against the steelers considering that in his other 2 games he played he was 14/24 and a TD with limited playing time in both of those games. Isn't a poor pre season.
UniverseIX
If we discounted the Super Bowl, the Patritos really did go undefeated.
were talking about individual players stats, not w/l ratio of teams. Vick was 2-1 in the preseason with one really bad game against the steelers. Does that mean he had a terrible preseason because he played one bad game? You didn't count a game, so I didn't count a game. See how the statistics are changed when you do that?[QUOTE="UniverseIX"]were talking about individual players stats, not w/l ratio of teams. Vick was 2-1 in the preseason with one really bad game against the steelers. Does that mean he had a terrible preseason because he played one bad game? You didn't count a game, so I didn't count a game. See how the statistics are changed when you do that? what stats changed? you weren't talking about Tom Brady's stats. I was putting things in the proper perspective. Vick only played 3 games. He performed poorly in one of them against a phenomenal defense, and adequate in the other two. The compilation of his stats isn't an indicator of his overall performance given the limited number of snaps he took. And each game needs to be examined one by one and not all together. when you lump them all together and say there are 4 pre season games and here are vick stats... yeah you can make it look like he did horrendous.[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]
If we discounted the Super Bowl, the Patritos really did go undefeated.
DroidPhysX
This also excludes the worst part of his statistic which are the 3 interceptions. HOW did they happen? Were they tipped balls? Did the wr's run the route improperly? All of these questions aren't apperent in the statistics.
a compilation of vicks pre seasons stats is therefore worthless.
You didn't count a game, so I didn't count a game. See how the statistics are changed when you do that? what stats changed? you weren't talking about Tom Brady's stats. I was putting things in the proper perspective. Vick only played 3 games. He performed poorly in one of them against a phenomenal defense, and adequate in the other two. The compilation of his stats isn't an indicator of his overall performance given the limited number of snaps he took. And each game needs to be examined one by one and not all together. when you lump them all together and say there are 4 pre season games and here are vick stats... yeah you can make it look like he did horrendous. Statistically the Patriots went 18-1. I take out the super bowl and now they went 18-0.[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="UniverseIX"] were talking about individual players stats, not w/l ratio of teams. Vick was 2-1 in the preseason with one really bad game against the steelers. Does that mean he had a terrible preseason because he played one bad game?
UniverseIX
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment