Riot squads to be used on anti-illegal immigrant protesters

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/07/06/SOURCE-FEDS-To-Bring-in-Riot-Squad-Against-Illegal-Immigration-Protesters

It's about to get interesting.

Exactly my thoughts.

So, who's going to go on the midnight ride to warn the people that the Brownshirts are coming?

Jose Revere.

Oh, I thought it was going to be Paulo Rivera.

I don't see the problem here. The riot police aren't stopping them from protesting. They're preventing the protest from getting out of control.

You're allowed to protest to stop a bus full of immigrants from going into your town, but you aren't allowed to physically stop it.

Oh you got me.

I don't see the issue either, they're allowed to protest but not allowed to block traffic.

Yes I know that, but the federal riot police, aka Storm Detachment, are the ground troops of the infected, uneducated illegal immigrant lawbreakers whom the people do not want in their communities. These infected invaders who don't speak English are not Americans and are not afforded the rights of Americans and if the people do not want them infesting their towns and villages, they have the right, nay the DUTY, to stop their invasion by force

If the assault troops of the federal government are now being dispatched to suppress the citizens of the United States with force then we are in civil war.

Are you trolling or truly insane? I have a feeling you've been listening to too much Alex Jones.

It's also ironic to compare them to the Nazis while basically saying you want America to be an all white country where people use force to get rid of foreigners. You sound quite a lot like a Nazi supporter.

Should still be treated humanely and with dignity.

No

Someone said to treat the illegal invaders with dignity? They aren't any different than someone who continuously breaks into your home. Would you treat a burglar with dignity?

how are they even close to being the same?

Is that a serious question?

If it is, this is the answer: Illegals are breaking into and illegally entering the United States and instead of shipping them back to wherever they came from, we take care of them. They are violating the sovereignty of the United States. DO you know what is meant by sovereignty?

"supreme power or authority."

"the authority of a state to govern itself or another state."

"Sovereignty' is a term used in many senses and is much abused. As used here, it implies a state's lawful control over it's territory generally to the exclusion of other states, authority to govern in that territory, and authority to apply law there"

"The supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable power by which any independent state is governed; supreme political authority; the supreme will; paramount control of the constitution and frame of government and its administration; the self-sufficient source of political power, from which all specific political powers are derived; the international independence of a state, combined with the right and power of regulating its internal affairs without foreign dictation;"

They're violating the US's ability to govern itself?

Those two things aren't mutually exclusive. We should ship them back from where they came and we should do it in a humane and dignify way.

Yeah, there is nothing as annoying as a group of people who come from another country and take over your land.

I agree. I'm not saying they should be beaten, but with the feds now actively breaking the law by protecting these invaders, the people now have to take the law into their own hands by citizens arrests and deportations.

For the people who are pro-illegal immigration there is a difference between not wanting to give illegal aliens a free pass and being racist against Latinos. Not all people who are against illegal immigration are racist and most of them have no problem with people coming here legally. To assume all people who are against illegal immigration are racist and comparing them to the KKK and their crusade against blacks is inaccurate.

how are they breaking the law?

It's not only inaccurate, it's hate speech.

what hate speech?

Accessory and facilitation to a crime is itself a crime.

Exactly what crime are they facilitating?

I think calling people racist when they are not is hate speech.

I'm not responding to anymore of your questions. They're disrupting the topic.

since when are racists a protected group of people?

trolololololololol

"In law, hate speech is any speech, gesture or conduct, writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group."

"Thus, the Supreme Court embraced the idea that hate speech is permissible unless it will lead to imminent hate violence"

So discussing the topic is disrupting the topic?

Not really. It's just inaccurate.

"The feds are pissed that they haven't been able to use this facility. Officers out there warned people that federal agents will be in Murrieta on Monday--they are going to get the next bus through no matter what."

What exactly does "no matter what" mean? If there are too many people for riot squads to handle, will they use pepper spray and flashbangs? When they run out of those, will the Brownshirts use guns and kill protesters without due process?

Is there any evidence besides hearsay that the federal agents ever said that or have any such plans?

Also, you complain that calling people racists is "hate speech" but you don't seem to have any problems calling people Nazis.

That's your opinion and even though I disagree, I respect your opinion.

I don't respect your opinions

Not sure if TC is trolling or actually this stupid

To the TC: It's one thing to argue your viewpoint, but if you wanna act like a jerk and just start throwing insults out to other people, do so someplace else.