Religious Argrument For Marriage

Wait a second, I think he's actually for same-sex relationships

Spider-Man opposes same-sex relationships.

THE_DRUGGIE

Even inanimate objects love spiderman.

[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] They can have a civil union if they want. It's not marriage though. kingkong0124

sounds like "separate but equal" to me. I don't think that went so well last time.

You are obviously a person who doesn't believe homosexuality is an innate part of a person.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

All Droid did was posted the image in response to the original post. You should drop the persecution complex.

worlock77

I'm not anti-religion in the slightest (if I were I would not be a Buddhist). Just anti-people who want to impose their religious beliefs on others. Again, drop the persecution complex.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]

sounds like "separate but equal" to me. I don't think that went so well last time.

jimkabrhel

You are obviously a person who doesn't believe homosexuality is an innate part of a person.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Droid, along with you, has a long history of being anti-religion...kingkong0124

I'm not anti-religion in the slightest (if I were I would not be a Buddhist). Just anti-people who want to impose their religious beliefs on others. Again, drop the persecution complex.

Insulting someone else's spirituality. Very open-minded of you.

[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]

Spider-Man opposes same-sex relationships.

Nickprovs

Even inanimate objects love spiderman.

Even the grannies can't get enough

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Droid, along with you, has a long history of being anti-religion...kingkong0124

I'm not anti-religion in the slightest (if I were I would not be a Buddhist). Just anti-people who want to impose their religious beliefs on others. Again, drop the persecution complex.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

I'm not anti-religion in the slightest (if I were I would not be a Buddhist). Just anti-people who want to impose their religious beliefs on others. Again, drop the persecution complex.

jimkabrhel

Insulting someone else's spirituality. Very open-minded of you.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

Thye just don't deserve the same rights? Care only goes so far?

Guybrush_3

sounds like "separate but equal" to me. I don't think that went so well last time.

Everyone knows a civil union is 3/5ths of a marriage ;).

[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] They can have a civil union if they want. It's not marriage though. TacticalDesire

sounds like "separate but equal" to me. I don't think that went so well last time.

Everyone knows a civil union is 3/5ths of a marriage ;).

Jim Crow for the 21st century.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Droid, along with you, has a long history of being anti-religion...kingkong0124

I'm not anti-religion in the slightest (if I were I would not be a Buddhist). Just anti-people who want to impose their religious beliefs on others. Again, drop the persecution complex.

.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

I'm not anti-religion in the slightest (if I were I would not be a Buddhist). Just anti-people who want to impose their religious beliefs on others. Again, drop the persecution complex.

Aljosa23

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] They are the ones that choose to be separate. kingkong0124

You are obviously a person who doesn't believe homosexuality is an innate part of a person.

But it isn't a choice.

Every post in this thread *fixed*

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

I'm not anti-religion in the slightest (if I were I would not be a Buddhist). Just anti-people who want to impose their religious beliefs on others. Again, drop the persecution complex.

THE_DRUGGIE

[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Buddhism is far from a normal religious system. Atheists, like yourself, choose to pursue Buddhism often to give themselves some meaning to their lives so they don't fall into things like nihilism. How's your struggle for enlightenment going btw? kingkong0124

.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] They are the ones that choose to be separate. kingkong0124

You are obviously a person who doesn't believe homosexuality is an innate part of a person.

Your predjudice makes Jesus sad.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

You are obviously a person who doesn't believe homosexuality is an innate part of a person.

TacticalDesire

But it isn't a choice.

[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Correcto. kingkong0124

But it isn't a choice.

Give me conclusive proof that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

No one understands :(

[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Correcto. kingkong0124

But it isn't a choice.

Actually, burden of proof is on the accuser. You are accusing people of choosing something that you view as wrong in your tiny little brain.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]

But it isn't a choice.

jimkabrhel

Give me conclusive proof that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

No one understands :(

Nickprovs

Needs more Spider-love

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]

But it isn't a choice.

Bloodaxe726

Actually, burden of proof is on the accuser. You are accusing people of choosing something that you view as wrong in your tiny little brain.

[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Correcto. kingkong0124

But it isn't a choice.

There's no reason to believe it's a choice.

ACTIVATED!

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Give me conclusive evidence that it isn't...burden of proof is on you. kingkong0124

Give me conclusive proof that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

How does OP feel about spidy wincest?

How does OP feel about spidy wincest?

Nickprovs

I'm sure that will get sticky.

ACTIVATED!

Nickprovs

.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

Give me conclusive proof that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

jimkabrhel

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Correcto. kingkong0124

But it isn't a choice.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Stop changing the subject. We're focused on one subject, let's not digress, shall we? kingkong0124

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Stop changing the subject. We're focused on one subject, let's not digress, shall we? kingkong0124

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

I don't know about you but, I've observed effects of evolution quite clearly. Maybe it's just because you're a moron that you fail to see them. Let me ask you, do you believe in gravity?

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

Guybrush_3

I don't know about you but, I've observed effects of evolution quite clearly. Maybe it's just because you're a moron that you fail to see them. Let me ask you, do you believe in gravity?

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Stop changing the subject. We're focused on one subject, let's not digress, shall we? kingkong0124

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

toast_burner

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Stop changing the subject. We're focused on one subject, let's not digress, shall we? kingkong0124

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

Scientists, and scientists have seen bacteria evolve. Evolution is based on observation of organisms reacting to different environments over time.

God is the response to the human condition to understand the universe from a spiritual aspect.

Nice try, but now you are the one who is off topic. Next you are going to use evolution to support your predjudice against gay people.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

Nickprovs

[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Your belief in evolution is illogical as well, as you are using an appeal to authority to try and justify that is is true. You haven't personally observed evolution but you continue to believe in it because some scientist said so. Funny how we all, ultimately, are illogical, isn't it? kingkong0124

I don't know about you but, I've observed effects of evolution quite clearly. Maybe it's just because you're a moron that you fail to see them. Let me ask you, do you believe in gravity?

You can also see bacteria evolve in a lab

[QUOTE="TacticalDesire"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Correcto. kingkong0124

But it isn't a choice.

http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14146-gay-brains-structured-like-those-of-the-opposite-sex.html

http://www.truthwinsout.org/opinion/2011/10/19114/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17904267%2C16143171%2C12836730%2C10763427%2C9549243?dopt=DocSum

http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/Pregnancy/3641

There you go. One of those links links to five other articles btw, so you're really getting around 9. :).

[QUOTE="Nickprovs"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Your belief in evolution is illogical as well, as you are using an appeal to authority to try and justify that is is true. You haven't personally observed evolution but you continue to believe in it because some scientist said so. Funny how we all, ultimately, are illogical, isn't it? kingkong0124

Actually, it's the result of feeling pity for you, and trying to make the thread more fun.

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

Using a religious argument, specifically achristian one means you are invoking the Bible and Christian beliefs. You are suggesting that homosexuality is a choice, not innate. I believe it is innate and not a choice. I also don't believe that Jesus Christ was the son of God.

You put the burden of proof on me (actually the burden of proof is on the accuser), so to turn it around, I sarcastically asked you to provide proof of the divinity of Jesus Christ.

Logic sucks, doesn't it? You cannot prove either thing. Which means that your feelings on homosexuality are based on belief, not fact, and in fact you are predjudiced. You don't care about homosexuals enough to grant them equal rights as hetersexual people.

jimkabrhel

Scientists, and scientists have seen bacteria evolve. Evolution is based on observation of organisms reacting to different environments over time.

God is the response to the human condition to understand the universe from a spiritual aspect.

Nice try, but now you are the one who is off topic. Next you are going to use evolution to support your predjudice against gay people.

[QUOTE="Nickprovs"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Your belief in evolution is illogical as well, as you are using an appeal to authority to try and justify that is is true. You haven't personally observed evolution but you continue to believe in it because some scientist said so. Funny how we all, ultimately, are illogical, isn't it? kingkong0124

Spider-Man gets angered at same-sex arguments.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Your belief in evolution is illogical as well, as you are using an appeal to authority to try and justify that is is true. You haven't personally observed evolution but you continue to believe in it because some scientist said so. Funny how we all, ultimately, are illogical, isn't it? kingkong0124

Scientists, and scientists have seen bacteria evolve. Evolution is based on observation of organisms reacting to different environments over time.

God is the response to the human condition to understand the universe from a spiritual aspect.

Nice try, but now you are the one who is off topic. Next you are going to use evolution to support your predjudice against gay people.

I am a scientist actually. A chemist. And I have studied biology. Evolution can be seen in bacteria and in man. Cultured have evolved to fit environmental factors. Africans having darker skin because of increase exposure to sun. Digestive systems evolving to fit edible foods in specific regions.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="kingkong0124"] Your belief in evolution is illogical as well, as you are using an appeal to authority to try and justify that is is true. You haven't personally observed evolution but you continue to believe in it because some scientist said so. Funny how we all, ultimately, are illogical, isn't it? kingkong0124

Scientists, and scientists have seen bacteria evolve. Evolution is based on observation of organisms reacting to different environments over time.

God is the response to the human condition to understand the universe from a spiritual aspect.

Nice try, but now you are the one who is off topic. Next you are going to use evolution to support your predjudice against gay people.

Making up terms like macro evolution doesn't help your argument.

Unlike some other's jimmies.

Btw, Kong have you ever gotten a vaccine? Those wouldn't work if it weren't for evolution.