Obama Thread

.

I really like seafood too.

Edit: and chicken.

Iszdope

[QUOTE="Iszdope"]

I really like seafood too.

Edit: and chicken.

chicknfeet

.

wis3boi

LOL.

wis3boi wins the thread.

You know a president is a lame duck when they're talking about their favorite foods. What's next, his favorite color?KC_Hokie

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]You know a president is a lame duck when they're talking about their favorite foods. What's next, his favorite color?JML897

Better?

Leftist conspiracy to make kids eat their vegetables which are full of mind-control agents put in place by the Monsanto corporation. Ace6301

You know a person blindly hates a person when they criticize something as inane as this.

I love broccoli. Put some melted cheese on it, great stuff.

[QUOTE="JML897"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]You know a president is a lame duck when they're talking about their favorite foods. What's next, his favorite color?KC_Hokie

Better?

Clearly a political agenda. 

You know a person blindly hates a person when they criticize something as inane as this.

jimkabrhel

At least when he's doing this

He can't be doing this

At least when he's doing this

 

He can't be doing this

KC_Hokie

Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.

KC_Hokie

You know KC I absolutely love that republicans constantly approve of the Reagan administration's use of quantitative easing, but when Obama does it it's socialism that must be stopped.

At least when he's doing this

 

He can't be doing this

KC_Hokie

America has certainly fallen into dire straits since Obama took office.

Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.comp_atkins

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.KC_Hokie

I love broccoli. Put some melted cheese on it, great stuff.

Michael0134567

Dat's good stuff!

At least when he's doing this

 

He can't be doing this

KC_Hokie

Uninformed Republican voter arguing against fiscal policy he doesn't understand with .jpgs.  We can always count on you for intelligent discourse, Hokie.

You know a president is a lame duck when they're talking about their favorite foods. What's next, his favorite color?KC_Hokie

Or when they're in their last year due to term limits.

Uninformed Republican voter arguing against fiscal policy he doesn't understand with .jpgs. We can always count on you for intelligent discourse, Hokie.theone86

[QUOTE="theone86"]Uninformed Republican voter arguing against fiscal policy he doesn't understand with .jpgs. We can always count on you for intelligent discourse, Hokie.KC_Hokie

You don't seem to understand how little the President can affect fiscal policy on his own. 

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="theone86"]Uninformed Republican voter arguing against fiscal policy he doesn't understand with .jpgs. We can always count on you for intelligent discourse, Hokie.jimkabrhel

You don't seem to understand how little the President can affect fiscal policy on his own. 

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] I voted for Gary Johnson. And no one seems to understand Obama's fiscal or foreign policy including Obama.KC_Hokie

You don't seem to understand how little the President can affect fiscal policy on his own. 

All of which are legislated by Congress, not the President, and you have seen how the last two Congresses have worked with the President. Not at all.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

You don't seem to understand how little the President can affect fiscal policy on his own. 

jimkabrhel

All of which are legislated by Congress, not the President, and you have seen how the last two Congresses have worked with the President. Not at all.

[QUOTE="theone86"]Uninformed Republican voter arguing against fiscal policy he doesn't understand with .jpgs. We can always count on you for intelligent discourse, Hokie.KC_Hokie

And that's supposed to be better?  Uninformed Republicans is basically the same thing as uninformed libertarian.

People understand it when they take the time to educate themselves on the theory behind it, look at real world evidence, and take a critical approach to evaluating it, as opposed to simply spitting out talking points because they refuse to take the time to understand it.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="theone86"]Uninformed Republican voter arguing against fiscal policy he doesn't understand with .jpgs. We can always count on you for intelligent discourse, Hokie.theone86

And that's supposed to be better?  Uninformed Republicans is basically the same thing as uninformed libertarian.

People understand it when they take the time to educate themselves on the theory behind it, look at real world evidence, and take a critical approach to evaluating it, as opposed to simply spitting out talking points because they refuse to take the time to understand it.

And I voted for Gary Johnson because he by far had the best executive record in governance.

[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] They can certainly impede it with excessive regulation, wasteful spending and higher taxes.KC_Hokie

All of which are legislated by Congress, not the President, and you have seen how the last two Congresses have worked with the President. Not at all.

Yeah, because all we should be concerned about with regulations is how they impact the economy, not if they successfully protect taxpayer interests such as fighting global warming.  Okay, here's the part where you post a chart that you think disproves global warming when it actually validates the theory.  What's most important is that people with shittons of money make more of it, everything else is secondary.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]

All of which are legislated by Congress, not the President, and you have seen how the last two Congresses have worked with the President. Not at all.

theone86

Yeah, because all we should be concerned about with regulations is how they impact the economy, not if they successfully protect taxpayer interests such as fighting global warming.  Okay, here's the part where you post a chart that you think disproves global warming when it actually validates the theory.  What's most important is that people with shittons of money make more of it, everything else is secondary.

.

wis3boi

[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] I voted for Gary Johnson. And no one seems to understand Obama's fiscal or foreign policy including Obama.KC_Hokie

And that's supposed to be better?  Uninformed Republicans is basically the same thing as uninformed libertarian.

People understand it when they take the time to educate themselves on the theory behind it, look at real world evidence, and take a critical approach to evaluating it, as opposed to simply spitting out talking points because they refuse to take the time to understand it.

And I voted for Gary Johnson because he by far had the best executive record in governance.

I said UNINFORMED Republicans are BASICALLY the same as UNINFORMED libertarians.  Maybe you should learn to read.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]

[QUOTE="theone86"]

And that's supposed to be better?  Uninformed Republicans is basically the same thing as uninformed libertarian.

People understand it when they take the time to educate themselves on the theory behind it, look at real world evidence, and take a critical approach to evaluating it, as opposed to simply spitting out talking points because they refuse to take the time to understand it.

theone86

And I voted for Gary Johnson because he by far had the best executive record in governance.

I said UNINFORMED Republicans are BASICALLY the same as UNINFORMED libertarians.  Maybe you should learn to read.

[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] No. Regulations are created and enforced by executive agencies. And it was the democrat lead Congress that passed his ''stimulus' and 'green' energy crap. They also allowed taxes to go up by not even allowing a vote on the floor.KC_Hokie

Yeah, because all we should be concerned about with regulations is how they impact the economy, not if they successfully protect taxpayer interests such as fighting global warming.  Okay, here's the part where you post a chart that you think disproves global warming when it actually validates the theory.  What's most important is that people with shittons of money make more of it, everything else is secondary.

Oh, so this is the part where you're proven hopelessly wrong on all counts due to your poor information and horrendous logic.  Can we just skip the entire global warming argument?  I don't think we need to derail the entire thread just to prove you don't know what you're talking about.

[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] Libertarians and republicans aren't the same. Maybe you should educate yourself on the difference.

And I voted for Gary Johnson because he by far had the best executive record in governance.

KC_Hokie

I said UNINFORMED Republicans are BASICALLY the same as UNINFORMED libertarians.  Maybe you should learn to read.

Uninformed conservatives vote for people like Bush, uninformed liberals vote for people like Obama.  The latter are preferrable by a mile.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="theone86"]

Yeah, because all we should be concerned about with regulations is how they impact the economy, not if they successfully protect taxpayer interests such as fighting global warming.  Okay, here's the part where you post a chart that you think disproves global warming when it actually validates the theory.  What's most important is that people with shittons of money make more of it, everything else is secondary.

theone86

Oh, so this is the part where you're proven hopelessly wrong on all counts due to your poor information and horrendous logic.  Can we just skip the entire global warming argument?  I don't think we need to derail the entire thread just to prove you don't know what you're talking about.

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="theone86"]

I said UNINFORMED Republicans are BASICALLY the same as UNINFORMED libertarians.  Maybe you should learn to read.

theone86

Uninformed conservatives vote for people like Bush, uninformed liberals vote for people like Obama.  The latter are preferrable by a mile.

[QUOTE="theone86"]

Obama wasted money on 'green' projects that all went bankrupt. Doesn't have anything to do with global warming since they all failed anyway. His 'stimulus' was a giant failure as well.KC_Hokie

First off, they didn't all go bankrupt, a lot of them are actually quite successful.  Second, of course it has to do with global warming.  Third, better to pour money into green energy than to keep handing it to oil companies.  Fourth, every industrialized nation is stimulating green energy growth and they're all killing us in development in that area.  Fifth, his stimulis put hundreds of thousands of Americans back to work.  Without that stimulus unemployment would be even higher, there would be less tax revenue, and the economy in general would be worse off.  This is exactly what I'm talking about when I say you're uninformed.

And I would argue the average independent is better informed then the average democrat or republican.KC_Hokie

And you would be wrong, as usual.

[QUOTE="theone86"]

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"] Are you really that stupid? First of all the U.S.' greenhouses gases have dropped to early 1990's levels because of natural gas. Second, developing countries like China and India keep increasing their emissions faster than we could ever cut back. KC_Hokie

Oh, so this is the part where you're proven hopelessly wrong on all counts due to your poor information and horrendous logic.  Can we just skip the entire global warming argument?  I don't think we need to derail the entire thread just to prove you don't know what you're talking about.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/energysource/2011/09/02/solyndras-failure-is-no-reason-to-abandon-federal-energy-innovation-policy/

https://lpo.energy.gov/

[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="theone86"]

Oh, so this is the part where you're proven hopelessly wrong on all counts due to your poor information and horrendous logic.  Can we just skip the entire global warming argument?  I don't think we need to derail the entire thread just to prove you don't know what you're talking about.

comp_atkins

http://www.forbes.com/sites/energysource/2011/09/02/solyndras-failure-is-no-reason-to-abandon-federal-energy-innovation-policy/

https://lpo.energy.gov/

• Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
      SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
      Solyndra ($535 million)*
      Beacon Power ($43 million)*
      Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
      SunPower ($1.2 billion)
      First Solar ($1.46 billion)
      Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
      EnerDels subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
      Amonix ($5.9 million)
      Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
      Abound Solar ($400 million)*
      A123 Systems ($279 million)*
      Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
      Johnson Controls ($299 million)
      Schneider Electric ($86 million)
      Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
      ECOtality ($126.2 million)
      Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
      Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
      Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
      Olsens Crop Service and Olsens Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
      Range Fuels ($80 million)*
      Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
      Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
      Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
      GreenVolts ($500,000)
      Vestas ($50 million)
      LG Chems subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
      Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
      Navistar ($39 million)
      Satcon ($3 million)*
      Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
      Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)