Take this test made by Harvard University and post your results. The following is mine.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Scored 29
Being able to judge someones mood from a poor quality B&W photo of just their eyes doesn't scream 'social intelligence' to me
Anyone want to explain the reasoning?
20 and don't believe it .... most of the eyes are too european (boring) ..... no blacks, australian aborigine, Pakistani, Arabic or Chinese ..
@chaoscougar1:
Such tests can be found within EQ tests - I took one a few months back for a senior sales role (reading the person opposite being integral to a successful sales process blah etc). I thought I did well - nailed it. In the 'reading emotion' part though I scored precisely zero, and overall within the bottom 10%, i.e. complete emotional retard. Social Intelligence I guess is a rough term for effectively being street wise - reading situations etc.
25/36
"Your exposure to Caucasians may have affected your score". O_O
I'm white and live in a white majority city in a very white majority state. Either this is bullshit or I suck at recognizing emotions. I'll just go with the latter, **** it.
28 out of 36
"your exposure to Caucasian faces might also have affected your score."
Thanks a bunch, honkies
Kind of a silly test. The rest of the face is important too, and the options they give have significant overlap. I mean, people can't even agree on whether there is more than four emotions, yet there are at least a dozen options on this test. I found the tests developed by Dr Paul Ekman to be more useful.
Also, this test did not show a main effect of gender. If we were to repeat the experiment using whole-body nonverbal communication I suspect that the results would differ.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment