Given how the situation is developing at Fukushima I was wondering if someone around here lives near a nuclear reactor. What are your thoughts ?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
You love your country far too much, I've seen you starting topic after topic conserning America. And even this one which could have been simple titled "Anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant?" had to be titled "Anyone in US or anywhere else who lives near a nuclear power plant ?". You are OBSESSED with your country. And you're one of the reasons I hate America.
DmadFearmonger
But its teh patriotism !
:P
Hmmm, could've sworn NREAL lives in Mexico.You love your country far too much, I've seen you starting topic after topic conserning America. And even this one which could have been simple titled "Anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant?" had to be titled "Anyone in US or anywhere else who lives near a nuclear power plant ?". You are OBSESSED with your country. And you're one of the reasons I hate America.
DmadFearmonger
Nope, I don't. The folks in Japan should have used Thorium, though. Wouldn't have caused such a large turd to hit the fan.
Hmmm, could've sworn NREAL lives in Mexico.[QUOTE="DmadFearmonger"]
You love your country far too much, I've seen you starting topic after topic conserning America. And even this one which could have been simple titled "Anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant?" had to be titled "Anyone in US or anywhere else who lives near a nuclear power plant ?". You are OBSESSED with your country. And you're one of the reasons I hate America.
Travo_basic
You're right Travo. I live in México and I love my country. US has more nuclear plants that anyother country so I think it's a valid topic
What the hell?... :|You love your country far too much, I've seen you starting topic after topic conserning America. And even this one which could have been simple titled "Anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant?" had to be titled "Anyone in US or anywhere else who lives near a nuclear power plant ?". You are OBSESSED with your country. And you're one of the reasons I hate America.
DmadFearmonger
You love your country far too much, I've seen you starting topic after topic conserning America. And even this one which could have been simple titled "Anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant?" had to be titled "Anyone in US or anywhere else who lives near a nuclear power plant ?". You are OBSESSED with your country. And you're one of the reasons I hate America.
DmadFearmonger
lol overreaction much?
Anyway, I used to live about 20 minutes from a nuclear plant, and my immediate family still does, but I doubt there's anything to worry about.
You love your country far too much, I've seen you starting topic after topic conserning America. And even this one which could have been simple titled "Anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant?" had to be titled "Anyone in US or anywhere else who lives near a nuclear power plant ?". You are OBSESSED with your country. And you're one of the reasons I hate America.
DmadFearmonger
Wow. Pent up rage much? You're so quick to assume the TC is American just so you can bash America and you've made yourself look like a fool.
On topic: I live fairly close to 3 mile island. No, I'm not in the least concerned about it.
I have a greater chance of getting killed in a car accident every day to school or work than I do getting showered by radiation..
Yeah I live in Springfield and this fat bald guy is the safety inspector. He's going to be the death of us all.
I don't believe one is around me but who knows i don't look much in it. i live in ohio btw.
BUT
question for you. Why are you saying anyone in u.s or anyone near a plant?
Do you think U.s is only ones have them?
They are bad and should never be built. They cause more harm then good...
Because hes fat an bald?Yeah I live in Springfield and this fat bald guy is the safety inspector. He's going to be the death of us all.
Branmuffin316
Hmmmm...is that a hint of jealousy I detect? ;)You love your country far too much, I've seen you starting topic after topic conserning America. And even this one which could have been simple titled "Anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant?" had to be titled "Anyone in US or anywhere else who lives near a nuclear power plant ?". You are OBSESSED with your country. And you're one of the reasons I hate America.
DmadFearmonger
A few months ago there was almost a meltdown in a powerplant about 200 km away. Don't know if you'd call that nearby?
I live within 15 miles of a Nuclear Power Station and I actually work there to. Whats happening in Japan is very sad and I can only imagine what the poor souls, who are trying to stop it getting worse, are going through. Judging by the news reports on radiation levels, I very much doubt any of the guys still working at the plant will live very long, they are most likely aware of that fact to.
I don't believe one is around me but who knows i don't look much in it. i live in ohio btw.
BUT
question for you. Why are you saying anyone in u.s or anyone near a plant?
Do you think U.s is only ones have them?
They are bad and should never be built. They cause more harm then good...
k2theswiss
And what alternative do you suggest? Wind farms? None of the alternatives are viable on there own and coal fired power stations produce far to much CO2. Seeing as though the computer you use, to write ignorant comments with, is powered by electricity, may be you should pipe down a bit.
Yeah, Diablo Canyon is about fifteenminutes away. I am not worried; they did lobby to have their inspection layed off for another 20 years so they dont have to do drastic upkeep on it, but supposedly the thing is so earthquake proof it can actually slide off the ground, into the ocean, and float lol. We had a 6.7 earthquake about five years ago in San Luis Obispo and I heard nothing bad happened there.
I haven't been paying much attention to Fukushima as of late, but I was under the impression that nothing has yet to go above that 1 Sv spike that occurred briefly about a week after the accident happened. Considering they pull people out if radiation goes above 250mSv I think they're fine. It's not like this was Chernobyl where merely being in the vicinity of the plant for a few hours was enough to guarantee you death.I live within 15 miles of a Nuclear Power Station and I actually work there to. Whats happening in Japan is very sad and I can only imagine what the poor souls, who are trying to stop it getting worse, are going through. Judging by the news reports on radiation levels, I very much doubt any of the guys still working at the plant will live very long, they are most likely aware of that fact to.
Bashers79
[QUOTE="k2theswiss"]
I don't believe one is around me but who knows i don't look much in it. i live in ohio btw.
BUT
question for you. Why are you saying anyone in u.s or anyone near a plant?
Do you think U.s is only ones have them?
They are bad and should never be built. They cause more harm then good...
Bashers79
And what alternative do you suggest? Wind farms? None of the alternatives are viable on there own and coal fired power stations produce far to much CO2. Seeing as though the computer you use, to write ignorant comments with, is powered by electricity, may be you should pipe down a bit.
seriously.
Theres been, what? 50-60 deaths? 50 or so from the initialy explosion at CHernobyl, and another 10 or so from radiation. 3 Mile Island was a joke (well, not really, but a joke in the sense that people are still scared of it lol). Japan is serious, but I think it'll end up being ok.
Now lets look at coal/oil plants. How many people have died from mining coal in the past six decades? How much damage has been done to the environment? How many people have died or killed for oil? Hell, I'd bet more people have fallen to their deaths installing wind turbines than died from nuclear power plant related accidents :P
Solar and wind power atm is idealism. Nuclear power is the best we can do. Coal is outdated and harmful but relatively cheap. If it were up to me, all power plants would be nuclear and we'd invest more into alternative/renewable research so we have a viable solution to nuclear power fifty years from now.
The Kotex, they are on aisle three.You love your country far too much, I've seen you starting topic after topic conserning America. And even this one which could have been simple titled "Anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant?" had to be titled "Anyone in US or anywhere else who lives near a nuclear power plant ?". You are OBSESSED with your country. And you're one of the reasons I hate America.
DmadFearmonger
I used to live close to one, but it was not built on a fault line. Less to worry about in those cases.
You love your country far too much, I've seen you starting topic after topic conserning America. And even this one which could have been simple titled "Anyone who lives near a nuclear power plant?" had to be titled "Anyone in US or anywhere else who lives near a nuclear power plant ?". You are OBSESSED with your country. And you're one of the reasons I hate America.
DmadFearmonger
Nope, I don't. The folks in Japan should have used Thorium, though. Wouldn't have caused such a large turd to hit the fan.
Hexagon_777
Im pretty sure the nuclear power plants in Fukushima were fairly old....
If I understand correctly, there are no nuclear power plants in Maryland. I think there is one in Virginia but Im not sure...
[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]
Nope, I don't. The folks in Japan should have used Thorium, though. Wouldn't have caused such a large turd to hit the fan.
Urworstnhtmare
Im pretty sure the nuclear power plants in Fukushima were fairly old....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium#Thorium_as_a_nuclear_fuel
The Fukushima reactors (atleast the first one) were built in the 70s.
[QUOTE="Bashers79"]I haven't been paying much attention to Fukushima as of late, but I was under the impression that nothing has yet to go above that 1 Sv spike that occurred briefly about a week after the accident happened. Considering they pull people out if radiation goes above 250mSv I think they're fine. It's not like this was Chernobyl where merely being in the vicinity of the plant for a few hours was enough to guarantee you death.I live within 15 miles of a Nuclear Power Station and I actually work there to. Whats happening in Japan is very sad and I can only imagine what the poor souls, who are trying to stop it getting worse, are going through. Judging by the news reports on radiation levels, I very much doubt any of the guys still working at the plant will live very long, they are most likely aware of that fact to.
gameguy6700
@ 250 mSv/hr you will achieve the UK annual dose limit in less than five minutes
[QUOTE="Bashers79"]
[QUOTE="k2theswiss"]
I don't believe one is around me but who knows i don't look much in it. i live in ohio btw.
BUT
question for you. Why are you saying anyone in u.s or anyone near a plant?
Do you think U.s is only ones have them?
They are bad and should never be built. They cause more harm then good...
mrbojangles25
And what alternative do you suggest? Wind farms? None of the alternatives are viable on there own and coal fired power stations produce far to much CO2. Seeing as though the computer you use, to write ignorant comments with, is powered by electricity, may be you should pipe down a bit.
seriously.
Theres been, what? 50-60 deaths? 50 or so from the initialy explosion at CHernobyl, and another 10 or so from radiation. 3 Mile Island was a joke (well, not really, but a joke in the sense that people are still scared of it lol). Japan is serious, but I think it'll end up being ok.
Now lets look at coal/oil plants. How many people have died from mining coal in the past six decades? How much damage has been done to the environment? How many people have died or killed for oil? Hell, I'd bet more people have fallen to their deaths installing wind turbines than died from nuclear power plant related accidents :P
Solar and wind power atm is idealism. Nuclear power is the best we can do. Coal is outdated and harmful but relatively cheap. If it were up to me, all power plants would be nuclear and we'd invest more into alternative/renewable research so we have a viable solution to nuclear power fifty years from now.
I'm arguing for nukes not against, I agree with you about them being the only viable power source at the moment.
[QUOTE="Urworstnhtmare"]
[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]
Nope, I don't. The folks in Japan should have used Thorium, though. Wouldn't have caused such a large turd to hit the fan.
Urworstnhtmare
Im pretty sure the nuclear power plants in Fukushima were fairly old....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorium#Thorium_as_a_nuclear_fuel
The Fukushima reactors (atleast the first one) were built in the 70s.
so 30-40 years old? plus there were supposedly questionable safety violations going on in those plants, I remember reading that two of the workers claimed they had to mix radioactive materials by hand.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment