Ubisoft and 500 million dollars

Link

I mean I guess it could have been worse. They could have invested that money into a boring franchise devoid of any redeeming quality what so ever like Ghost Recon. But ugh I really can't say I want a new Splinter Cell after Conviction. I would be fine with an action/stealth approach if they had at least done a good job with it. But no they had to go throw a FPS mission in it.

Oh well at least there is always Chaos Theory and it's excellence



*sigh* back when Ubisoft was good at videogames...sort of.

I have Conviction. I want to see why people say it's so bad. Is it like the RE4 of the RE series where the previous fanbase absolutely hated it or is just a terrible game all around ?kage_53

I have Conviction. I want to see why people say it's so bad. Is it like the RE4 of the RE series where the previous fanbase absolutely hated it or is just a terrible game all around ?kage_53

I'd still say it generally lacked anything resembling worthwhile gameplay (aside from the odd open-ish section, it was like the worst of stealth games mixed with the worst of cover shooters and manshooter aesthetics), but yeah, selling it as a Splinter Cell title instead of a new IP was the crap cherry on top of a sh*t sundae.

Being a metal gear fan(male), I was very anti splinter cell for a long time. However Chaos theory changed that, then double agent changed it back, and conviction was a pretty solid game up until the last few levels when it becomes a poorly designed shooter.

Basically it is better than double agent and not as good as CT. (For me)