Panthers cut Keyshawn

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2855468

Does anyone else think it is absolutely hillarious and ironic that he was interviewing his own replacement on ESPN? :lol: I guess Jarrett won't be getting Keyshawn's teachings afterall.

Now that the Vikings are loaded with speedsters at wideout, all we need is a solid possession WR...HEY! I think I found someone who fits the bill!!!

It would be ironic if the Vikings passed on Dwayne Jarrett, then signed the man he replaced, letting Carolina take Jarrett just so that the Vikings could end up with Sidney Rice and Keyshawn Johnson? 

But cutting him after only one year? They just gave him a bonus too, and it wasn't entirely all of his fault that the team struggled last year. I think they should have kept him for at least one more, because I don't see how Jarrett as a rookie could be better.Renegade_Fury

Well the Panthers organization wanted to get "younger" and the 34 year old KJ is too old in their minds.  Hell if it were my choice I would have cut Delhomme because you're right, Keyshawn wasn't the problem for them last year, it was the guy throwing to him.  But my best guess is they wanted to let the 3 young receivers compete for a starting spot and they couldn't do that with Johnson on the team.  Jarret could be a great receiver in the league but lets not forget about Drew Carter, although he struggled a little last year he had his flashes of brillance.