@Gargus said:
@Treflis said:
Freedom of Speech is one thing, Hate speech is a different matter.
And considering some of the comments given out at other reviews about matters that are less sensitive then Homosexuality, They're well within their right to take precautions.
If you want to say what you mean about the game, go right ahead. Right here and now.
Either its all ok or none of its ok.
See people like to use the phrase "hate speech" when someone isn't in line with them. Like how everyone called that duck dynasty guy a racist, homophobe, anti gay and so on just because his views weren't that of our politically correct society. If someone can be pro gay then it should be within someones rights to be anti gay. You cant preach tolerance and acceptance in this country if you aren't willing to be tolerant and accept people who don't agree with you, that's the fucking point of being tolerant and accepting.
I do not believe in what the KKK stands for, but I will NEVER EVER tell them they are wrong or that they shouldn't be able to say or think what they want because they have that right. I just simply chose to not pay attention to them and let them do what makes them happy while I do the same.
So no hate speech isn't a different matter when you get down to it. If you can give love speech then someone else should be able to give hate speech. Only the truly tolerant and truly accepting people can understand that.
Free speech doesn't mean that the Duck Dynasty moron can say stupid things without anyone calling out his idiocy. The 'local blacks love oppression' was the standard refrain of the South during slavery and became the standard refrain again after the Redemption during the reign of Jim Crow (at which point blacks became legal nonentities and thus vulnerable to the worst instincts of whoever).
For example, for a long time in the Deep South recreational rape of black woman was a common practice because for decades it wasn't prosecuted (a black person could not testify against a white person in court and hope to win). The famous Rosa Parks started off as the NAACP's lead investigator in such cases.
--------------------
http://www.theroot.com/articles/politics/2010/09/rosa_parks_had_a_radical_side_championing_the_rights_of_rape_victims.html
In 1944 Taylor, a 24-year-old mother and sharecropper, was walking home from an evening of singing and praying at the Rock Hill Holiness Church in Abbeville, Ala., when she was kidnapped by seven white men with shotguns and knives, raped and left for dead.
The Montgomery branch of the NAACP dispatched its best investigator and organizer, Rosa Parks -- yes, Rosa Parks -- to Abbeville. Despite a confession, corroborating testimony, affidavits from at least three eyewitnesses and overwhelming evidence, two all-white, all-male grand juries refused to issue any indictments. That result was not unusual across the South.
"They said they'd kill me if I told on them," Taylor said. But she spoke out anyway. When her life was threatened and the home she shared with her husband and toddler firebombed, she moved in with her father, who spent every night crouched in a tree, holding a shotgun that he was ready to use to protect his family. Decades before the women's movement, as McGuire writes, "Taylor's refusal to remain silent helped expose a ritual of rape in existence since slavery, inspired a nationwide campaign to defend black womanhood, and gave hope to thousands suffering through similar abuses."
----------------------
If one chooses to remain ignorant of history that is fine and good, but use common sense. Many people are only as good as they have to be, so people with no rights are targets for abuse. As conservatives love to point out in other contexts, what makes democracy and capitalism work better than the alternatives is that they recognize the imperfections of man and seek to channel them (by way of contrast, communism assumes that both the rulers and the ruled will ignore self interest and work hard for a nebulous greater good, which just isn't the way most people are wired).
Sadly, what some conservatives choose to do is ignore true conservatism in order to defend bigotry and evil.
Log in to comment