Treyarch is ruining Call Of Duty's good name.

I do not understand why infinity Ward let's Treyarch develop those crappy games like Call Of Duty 3. Treyarch is just trying to get the unsuspecting gamer to buy their games because they have the Call Of Duty title, and it is ruining COD's reputation as a good series. I have faithfully played their games since the first one on the PC and then later played COD2 on the 360 at launch. I was soooo happy that the Call Of Duty series had gotten the amazing followup it deserved. So i was really delighted to find that i only had to wait one more year for Call Of Duty 3, as i'm sure alot of people out there were. I ran out and bought COD3 the instant it came out, only to find that it sucked, horribly. The Call Of Duty formula was there, but it was twisted until unrecognizable. I couldn't believe that Treyarch could screw something up that bad. Treyarch is simply screwing up the well earned reputation that Infinity Ward started. Hopefully Tryarch will do better with COD5, but i suppose we'll find out. Anyone else feel this way?

Ehhh, sorry for the rant, i got cought up in the moment i suppose.

No, they aren't. Because people know by now that Treyarch is the red-headed stepchild of Call of Duty and the franchise built and perfected by Infinity Ward is a separate entity.

People won't stop buying Infinity Ward games because Treyarch makes a crappier version. They will simply buy less of the Treyarch line of Call of Duty games.

Edit: Also, Activision doesn't think that Treyarch is as good as Infinity Ward and they most certainly do not think Treyarch is the true voice of the series. Activision doesn't allow, they employee Treyarch so they can further milk their second-most profitable franchise. They do it because people will buy it and though they probably wished every Call of Duty was made by Infinity Ward, Activision knows that Infinity Ward will not make an entry to the series every year. Infinity Ward spends two-or more-year cycles perfecting games; unlike other studios *coughEAsportscough.*

In the mean time, Activision will continue to do what they do best. Making money.

[QUOTE="IISF-SniperII"]

I do not understand why infinity Ward let's Treyarch develop those crappy games like Call Of Duty 3. Treyarch is just trying to get the unsuspecting gamer to buy their games because they have the Call Of Duty title, and it is ruining COD's reputation as a good series. I have faithfully played their games since the first one on the PC and then later played COD2 on the 360 at launch. I was soooo happy that the Call Of Duty series had gotten the amazing followup it deserved. So i was really delighted to find that i only had to wait one more year for Call Of Duty 3, as i'm sure alot of people out there were. I ran out and bought COD3 the instant it came out, only to find that it sucked, horribly. The Call Of Duty formula was there, but it was twisted until unrecognizable. I couldn't believe that Treyarch could screw something up that bad. Treyarch is simply screwing up the well earned reputation that Infinity Ward started. Hopefully Tryarch will do better with COD5, but i suppose we'll find out. Anyone else feel this way?

Ehhh, sorry for the rant, i got cought up in the moment i suppose.

Vadoc81

:roll:

I can think of over three hundred million reasons why Activision is allowing Treyach to develop CoD5, and the reasons a start with $. Activision controls the gaming industry. The most popular game this past year was Call of Duty 4. It was made brilliantly by Infinity Ward. The next game is going to be screwed up *cough again cough* by Treyach. The reason Activision doesn't think that it will hurt their sales is because only a small percentage of the people who are going to buy CoD5 will realize that it wasn't done by infinity ward before they buy the game. The small percentage of people on Gamespot who know ahead of time of the developer are probably still going to buy the game. The majority of the people who will buy CoD5 won't give a **** about who developed the game, only that it is a Call of Duty Title.

I do not understand why infinity Ward let's Treyarch develop those crappy games like Call Of Duty 3. Treyarch is just trying to get the unsuspecting gamer to buy their games because they have the Call Of Duty title, and it is ruining COD's reputation as a good series. I have faithfully played their games since the first one on the PC and then later played COD2 on the 360 at launch. I was soooo happy that the Call Of Duty series had gotten the amazing followup it deserved. So i was really delighted to find that i only had to wait one more year for Call Of Duty 3, as i'm sure alot of people out there were. I ran out and bought COD3 the instant it came out, only to find that it sucked, horribly. The Call Of Duty formula was there, but it was twisted until unrecognizable. I couldn't believe that Treyarch could screw something up that bad. Treyarch is simply screwing up the well earned reputation that Infinity Ward started. Hopefully Tryarch will do better with COD5, but i suppose we'll find out. Anyone else feel this way?

Ehhh, sorry for the rant, i got cought up in the moment i suppose.

IISF-SniperII

I feel the same way. I regret buying COD3 and will not buy any future COD games made by Treyarch.

ill post this again:

Treyarch had 11 months to develop CoD 3 but now have 2 years for this next one.

No, they aren't. Because people know by now that Treyarch is the red-headed stepchild of Call of Duty and the franchise built and perfected by Infinity Ward is a separate entity.

People won't stop buying Infinity Ward games because Treyarch makes a crappier version. They will simply buy less of the Treyarch line of Call of Duty games.

Edit: Also, Activision doesn't think that Treyarch is as good as Infinity Ward and they most certainly do not think Treyarch is the true voice of the series. Activision doesn't allow, they employee Treyarch so they can further milk their second-most profitable franchise. They do it because people will buy it and though they probably wished every Call of Duty was made by Infinity Ward, Activision knows that Infinity Ward will not make an entry to the series every year. Infinity Ward spends two-or more-year cycles perfecting games; unlike other studios *coughEAsportscough.*

In the mean time, Activision will continue to do what they do best. Making money.

GSU28

Yeah, but the average casual gamer doesn't know that. They don't dabble into the specifics of who made the game. And when Infinity Wars comes back around for COD 6, the casual gamers aren't going to be interested because of the sour taste that Treyarch left in their mouth.

[QUOTE="GSU28"]

No, they aren't. Because people know by now that Treyarch is the red-headed stepchild of Call of Duty and the franchise built and perfected by Infinity Ward is a separate entity.

People won't stop buying Infinity Ward games because Treyarch makes a crappier version. They will simply buy less of the Treyarch line of Call of Duty games.

Edit: Also, Activision doesn't think that Treyarch is as good as Infinity Ward and they most certainly do not think Treyarch is the true voice of the series. Activision doesn't allow, they employee Treyarch so they can further milk their second-most profitable franchise. They do it because people will buy it and though they probably wished every Call of Duty was made by Infinity Ward, Activision knows that Infinity Ward will not make an entry to the series every year. Infinity Ward spends two-or more-year cycles perfecting games; unlike other studios *coughEAsportscough.*

In the mean time, Activision will continue to do what they do best. Making money.

omfg_its_dally

Yeah, but the average casual gamer doesn't know that. They don't dabble into the specifics of who made the game. And when Infinity Wars comes back around for COD 6, the casual gamers aren't going to be interested because of the sour taste that Treyarch left in their mouth.

thats why CoD4 bombed sooooo bad :roll:

Screw CoD! Its a stupid series. Yay Treyarch! They rock the spiderman games.

I thought CoD3 was far better than CoD2. CoD2 was not epic enough nor as intense as CoD3. I do think tho that CoD1+UO is far better than CoD3. That's for the WW2 games but the best CoD game overall IMO is CoD4.ForsbergFan21

You're right, CoD 3 was pretty epic. Lots of larger battles that weren't there as much in CoD 2. I've enjoyed every CoD game I've played, and I can't say I liked one more than the other. They were all different, but good in their own way. I am speaking only of the main series, though... never played the Big Red One or Finest Hour.

Im playing COD World at War right now and Im impresed on how Treyarch screwed the game, its just horrible, I so want my $60 bucks back!

I thought Call of Duty World At War was a particularly good game. The online was more of the same, but CoD4's online was so good why would you want to change it?

I do not understand why infinity Ward let's Treyarch develop those crappy games like Call Of Duty 3. Treyarch is just trying to get the unsuspecting gamer to buy their games because they have the Call Of Duty title, and it is ruining COD's reputation as a good series. I have faithfully played their games since the first one on the PC and then later played COD2 on the 360 at launch. I was soooo happy that the Call Of Duty series had gotten the amazing followup it deserved. So i was really delighted to find that i only had to wait one more year for Call Of Duty 3, as i'm sure alot of people out there were. I ran out and bought COD3 the instant it came out, only to find that it sucked, horribly. The Call Of Duty formula was there, but it was twisted until unrecognizable. I couldn't believe that Treyarch could screw something up that bad. Treyarch is simply screwing up the well earned reputation that Infinity Ward started. Hopefully Tryarch will do better with COD5, but i suppose we'll find out. Anyone else feel this way?

Ehhh, sorry for the rant, i got cought up in the moment i suppose.