Why was this version of the game given the short shift?
User Rating: 3 | Call of Duty: World at War - Final Fronts PS2
I was looking forward to this game ever since I found out about it. To say I was extremely let down is an understatement. This is about as close to a kiddy game you can get without it being one. I beat it in less than a day. There is no online, There are no extras either. It looks like they took a step back with the graphics as well. It looks more like a saturday morning cartoon. I think that at 40 dollars, there needs to be some effort put into it. It seems these developers did the same thing EA did with Nascar 09 , (read my review for that one, and you'll see what I mean.)I for one, am getting tired of these developers putting little effort into a game just because it is for the ps2. Why not just don't make it? The other versions have the Russians in it, why was this completely changed? The content, with the exception of quite a few missions is bare bones. I am definately digusted with Treyarch. I don't understand why this game was so bare bones when the others were great. If leaving out content is your war to try to get someone to upgrade their system, it is the wrong approach. I may upgrade, but I will think twice about buying your product due to your short shifting me with this one.
--