Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Multiplayer Weapons

"Looks best on xbox one"

~ A dirty peasant

@Messenger360p but call of duty was around before halo, crysis, & titanfall so wouldnt they have copied off cod?

@Messenger360p "still plays like a paintball game"

What does that even mean?

@Messenger360p SHHHH dumy. IT has the best grapichs than any game. Looks best on xbox FGS!!!!!!! get it right next time anyway im 11 not 14 so ha!

@saltlife225 Lag is mostly based on ping. Also, Black Ops 1 and Modern Warfare 3 run on a different system than the rest of the series using much more lag compensation. A lot of rage in those games are justified because you can be out of sprint animation shooting at a guy who is sprinting, get no hitmarkers and die, and in the reality (sometimes seen in killcam) the situation was exactly reverse. Trust me if lag compensation is brought back in Advanced Warfare I will complain and most of the community will, too. I think everyone wants dedicated servers. Personally, every COD besides BO1 and MW3 play good for me because I have very low ping (single digits to low teens, no packet loss, 0-2ms jitter). Even off host I tend to get into fair lobbies or at least reasonably fair. I don't need dedicated servers, but there are a lot of hardcore fans that don't have as good internet and do need it. Download and Upload speeds matter to a small extent or if you are running a lot of different things at one time. Also, being wireless adds latency on your default ping so it's best to plug your xbox/playstation directly into your router via ethernet. All this is getting way too nerdy. I don't see what all this talk really benefits, and I'm just rambling to try tou counter you. Bottom line, everyone should embrace dedicated servers so the game is more fair. Lag compensation is the plague that spawned for trying to find an alternative.

@saltlife225

I agree with most except the first one. You don't need 5MB up to have a lag free connection. Depending on your provider, you can have as low as a 1MB down and still play smoothly (although downloading updates and DLC will take you FOREVER). Really and truly the download/upload speed isn't the important factor there. It is something called latency, which is to say "how fast your connected machine can talk to the internet world and bring a message back". A lot of people get this confused with download or upload speeds...these are just the speeds of the internet service you are connecting to...not how fast you can make that connection. ISP's usually don't advertise their latency unless you ask for it. Usually a higher down/up comes with a higher latency but not always.

Let me end with two examples:

I had a friend who tried this new "satellite internet" that has no limit on location. He was getting a very high download speed (almost always in the 12+MB down). He could stream several movies at once with no problem, download music and movies very fast. BUT he had the worst latency and lets just say you wouldn't want to try to play CoD or any shooter on his internet connection.

On the other side, when I go to visit my parents I sometimes take my PS4. My parents aren't very "tech" oriented but they do have internet. Now their download speed is usually less than 1MB up and, although you would think that is horrible, I've actually been able to play very smoothly most of the time on their internet. Why is this? Well, although they had a low download speed, they had almost instant speed on their latency.

@epicsymphony Modern Warfare 3 was the worst. Ghosts itself had the lowest pre-orders since World at War, and actually outsold its pre-release estimates on VGChartz.

@ferflohte I'm not sure what you're looking for. I like CoD and have bought every one since MW1.

If they make it 3rd person, I won't buy it.

If they make the maps too big, I won't buy it.

What more can you ask for?