Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition Graphics Comparison - Remaster VS Original

(Sponsored by Dell Gaming) We compared the graphics of the original Bulletstorm for Xbox 360 to the new remaster, Bulletstorm: Full Clip Edition on PC! See how they stack up against each other!

15 Comments  RefreshSorted By 
GameSpot has a zero tolerance policy when it comes to toxic conduct in comments. Any abusive, racist, sexist, threatening, bullying, vulgar, and otherwise objectionable behavior will result in moderation and/or account termination. Please keep your discussion civil.

Avatar image for cashx002
cashx002

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Bahahha.. The main difference is just the smoother framerate. That's about it, BUT i'll still get this. Love this game son.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for gollygeeswell
gollygeeswell

8

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By gollygeeswell

The original looks better. I was a huge fan of Bulletstorm. Thought it played and looked wonderful. No desire to play a remaster. I'd love a sequel.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-59d93003b3a2e
deactivated-59d93003b3a2e

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Have they updated the controls? I think it was the lack of jumping, awkward shoot/zoom buttons, and the small play areas made for consoles with 512mb memory that made me stop playing it the first time around.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for triplebullet
triplebullet

404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 1

Textures are better especially the tattoo at 1:30 but other than that I don't really see the point of this remaster. This game lasted most people a few days it seems and was totally forgotten.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-5b2c8e0382c99
deactivated-5b2c8e0382c99

622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This was a pointless remaster. The game wasn't even a hit to begin with. The original version honestly looks better in a lot of sections. The new brighter look isn't really helping.

2 • 
Avatar image for iflayev
iflayev

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

Is it only to me that the original seems better?

5 • 
Avatar image for deactivated-59d93003b3a2e
deactivated-59d93003b3a2e

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@iflayev: Yes, I have original PC game and I would much rather have them patch out Games for Windows Live so anyone can install and play it but you can't charge $60 for a patch.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for spartanx169x
spartanx169x

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

Edited By spartanx169x

@iflayev: no its not just you. The new lighting did nothing to make it look better.

2 • 
Avatar image for SCImonTemplar
SCImonTemplar

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

SCImonTemplar  Online

So instead of dark jaggies, it's now bright jaggies?

3 • 
Avatar image for athlon642
athlon642

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Really? Are you kidding? Why dont compare PC version vs PC version??

Upvote • 
Avatar image for deactivated-59d93003b3a2e
deactivated-59d93003b3a2e

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@athlon642: Personally, I think the original PC version looks better. They probably couldn't install the original PC game due to the Windows Game requirement to verify the game before being able to play it and it takes a PC wizard to verify the install.

Upvote • 
Avatar image for feenixx7
Feenixx7

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

@Mickeplask: I agree that the version/resolution they show here doesn't really show much difference aside from some more detailed textures, shadows..etc...but for those who can run it in 4K its a LOT better. I wouldn't get it unless you can run it at that res but if you can then its worth it.

Upvote •