Ok, i get it why would someone give this game 9.0, but stil i don't like it, at all!
User Rating: 3 | Sid Meier's Civilization V PC
I was waiting to do review till some expansion comes up, now that Gods and Kings are out, ill do it. Ok, it has a nice graphics, new combat system, new civics,and many other things. But i don't like it, at all, i mean, wtf is this, i played it till medieval age, and than I uninstalled it, and then installed civ 4. You can't stack units on one place, wtf!, so 1000000 people can be in one city (one tile), but there is no place for few warrior on one tile, and you can't put them in city, so i wish to have enormous army, but it would probably fill the entire map, awful! awful! awful! I get it, strategy, but i'm not playing Age of Empires III but Civilization, good old Civilization, witch I've been playing since Civilization II, and i spended playing more than 6 months on every part since Civilization II. And embarking, what, so they just make themselves a boat, crappy, weak boat, and here we go. Just awful! And civics, i could cry, and what about this new religions in Gods and Kings, I'm still laughing. What about loading times, it takes forever to turn. Point is that i've had a feeling like i was playing Age of Empires, with lot of Civilization features, and the game is just boring, to boring Why do they always ruin sequels of good old games, like Tiberium Wars, GTA IV, Need For Speed, Mass Effect 3 etc... like everything was ok till 2008, and then this obviously this commercialism and capitalism started to effect game industry. Just as at my work, we don't make product to see people enjoy it anymore, we make it to make money, and yes it affects the quality.
