Great and original idea wasted with bad camera, linear graphics and environment.
The Good:
1. Great, original and new idea. all in-game mechanics and ideas are just good and fun.
2. Good story.
The Bad:
1. Dx9 outdated graphics, no DX10 nor 11 support. only thing it has is high texture graphics and thats it which is not a plus in anyway. however, i noticed my GPUs temps are somehow over the usual, they were 65 degrees while in other games like Metro Last night and Tomb Raider, it never got above 55 degrees, and both of these titles kick this one right into the trash. this lead me to think, the code is really crappy and not optimized at all, they are alot of unnecessary code routines executed on the GPU which keep it busy all the time, i could be wrong though.
2. Camera is crap because of crappy port from consoles, it made me dizzy more than once, forced auto camera adjustment when you walk with your keyboard killed this game on PC.
3. Environment and world is pretty linear, you cant interact with anything, just keep running, jumping on ledges and between roofs. also its just big area with small predefined path that you can only walk, jump or run through it.
4. too many cut scenes and you cannot quit the game nor skip.
5. forcing you to walk slowly when you reach certain points which bugged me alot. but well lots of games do this AND I DONT REALLY KNOW WHY?!!?
6. boring after playing it 3-4 hours as its just the same thing repeating itself over and over accors linear world and gameplay.
to understand why i'm saying this, i came from Tomb Raider and Metro Last Night ,this is how the standards of any AAA PC game should be for 60$, if you want to charge 60$ same as other AAA titles, the title should at least stand up among them. this game is below all standards, it felt 2005-2006 game and it would get good score if that was the case, but unfortunately its not the case here. IMO it doesnt even worth 30$. it should be priced at 20$.