wow a 6.....really?

Avatar image for BlazeKingz
BlazeKingz

713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 BlazeKingz
Member since 2009 • 713 Posts

Really gamespot? a effin 6? this piece of shit is something that might even be worse than ride to hell let alone be according to you on par with games like thief and arkham origins. WTF a 2 hour crappy rail shooter getting a 6...this is one of those times when if someone would say gamespot was paid off i would belive them. This must be a joke........

Avatar image for shamarke
shamarke

587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By shamarke
Member since 2004 • 587 Posts

@BlazeKingz: Welcome to the real world bro.

Avatar image for Gods_Son23
Gods_Son23

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Gods_Son23
Member since 2006 • 226 Posts

I agree that giving this the same score as arkham origins is rich. But look at any review site on music, film or games and you are going to find inconsistencies. Sequels normally get compared to what came before and that was the case for Origins which didn't offer anything much new.

I'm going to be one of the few who stick up for the game as well. Firstly, it's a helluva lot more playable and better made than the unfinished Ride to hell.. And secondly, what is not true in the review. It ain't gonna be remembered in a few months or be in end of year lists but it's a fun rail shooter.

Avatar image for zwenti
zwenti

186

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#4 zwenti
Member since 2004 • 186 Posts

Yeah this is a new low-point for gamespot!

But who cares? The internet is full of good reviewers and gaming-websites. Only gamespot makes themselves irrelevant.

Nothing more and nothing less.