zidane345's forum posts

Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts
now what are the recommended specs?
Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts

Warhawk

F1:CE

MGS4

Resistance

that about it

Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts

Since december the cow population has sharply risen, and now they probably make up most of the system wars population.

So longer are most threads against the playstation 3, they are for it.

So what has changed?

Since christmas you have had no decent exclusives

Your 2008 has been confirmed second best to that of the xbox 360

But still somehow you have all picked up some false hope from somewhere, maybe over night the console with no AAAE's has just become better than its competitors and has become all mighty.

So whats happened?

scottiescott238

they got tired of saying just wait

Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts
microsoft will enter the fight
Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts
michael Jordan?
Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="TBoogy"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="TBoogy"]Actually, I live in Chicago and recently decided to join the church. Dont see it as relevant, really.TBoogy

That's unfortunate.

Figured someone would say that. But actually, I researched the church all the way back to its start, and made a good decision. Actually, the period BEFORE they got so-called "militant" was of more concern to me.

Then, they were trying to integrate so much that the church was only middle class blacks who looked down on lower income blacks and did little for the community. Then membership dropped, and they decided to adopt more of the stance of the Nation of Islam and the Hebrew Israelites (both big in Chicago) to get people back in Church. THEN they hired Wright. I would have hated the church before him. I'm glad he came, and only wish I had got the chance to see him before he left.

Best of all though, I researched the new reverend and I like him already. He comes at the end of the month, I believe.

Honestly, if you think Wrights stance is that far removed from other black citizens, you would be surprised. There are TONS of Churches like his. You only heard about this one because of Obama. We do think that the U.S. has a lot to fix, doesn't mean that we don't want Her to pull it off. I pray I will see the day in my lifetime.

That's just sickening. He's an anti-american racist. Also, whoever believes and acts the way he does -- I'll stay far away from.

I think many people take those with "militant" views to be racist. Its an easy way to group us. I dont hate any race. In fact , I would say that I see the people of the world as "one" more than most anyone you would find. Its not as simple as you think.

But yes, I think America has work to do. Doesn't mean i'm "Anti" anymore than I would be against my own children if I told them I expect greatness out of them.

thats fine if you think america has work to do, i think every citizen thinks the same however Wrights comments didn't show that, he sounded more anti then anything

Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]You can try to twist it any way you want -- Saddam was an oppressive ruler and killed innocent civilians.Vandalvideo
He was also a stabalizer that was preventing an all out war between two very large Islamic factiosn that could have spread to every last country in the middle easy. You say tyrannical dictator I say stabalizer. Tomato Tomoto. Thats not to say you're wrong. You're totally right. We're both right.

one thing i can agree with you is that to this day i still don't why we went in Iraq, the reason for going in has changed over time however that is irrelevant for now, what is important is how we get out with having to go back later

Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts
[QUOTE="kool-aids"]

Ahh, the rules of war.

No one follows them.

creepy_mike

Did you just use the fact that people break the law to justify people breaking the law? Again, please leave my country. Your kind are becoming a serious threat to my liberty and safety.

this isn't your country, he has a right to his opinon just like you and me whether you agree with it or not, how do expect to reach someone by being a smartass

Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts

[QUOTE="zidane345"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="kool-aids"][QUOTE="creepy_mike"][QUOTE="zidane345"]

if it is to gain information and being able to prevent another 9/11 then so be unless you honestly think that dealing with people that think they will be highly reward in the afterlife, much more then any thing they can accomplish in there lifetime in the world, will talk by asking them questions face to face

creepy_mike

Torture is never okay, even if its done to brown-skinned people whose names you can't pronounce.

And If they're so sure they're terrorists, why don't they charge them? Ever heard of due process? or is that not American enough for you?

Torture is ok if its done right.

Sure, if you ignore that thing called the Geneva Conventions. Who needs them? Article 17: Article 17): "No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be threatened, insulted or exposed to unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind."

you honeslty think al-qaud(sp) or any of the other islamic radicals follows the Geneva conventions?

You honestly think we should be more like Al Queda?

no, do you?

don't remember ever saying that or giving that assumption

Avatar image for zidane345
zidane345

695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 zidane345
Member since 2004 • 695 Posts
[QUOTE="kool-aids"][QUOTE="creepy_mike"][QUOTE="zidane345"]

if it is to gain information and being able to prevent another 9/11 then so be unless you honestly think that dealing with people that think they will be highly reward in the afterlife, much more then any thing they can accomplish in there lifetime in the world, will talk by asking them questions face to face

Vandalvideo

Torture is never okay, even if its done to brown-skinned people whose names you can't pronounce.

And If they're so sure they're terrorists, why don't they charge them? Ever heard of due process? or is that not American enough for you?

Torture is ok if its done right.

Sure, if you ignore that thing called the Geneva Conventions. Who needs them? Article 17: Article 17): "No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be threatened, insulted or exposed to unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind."

you honeslty think al-qaud(sp) or any of the other islamic radicals follows the Geneva conventions?