Is there a developer that has released a game on the PC and went "nuts" with what they can do on the PC? Nope. This idea that there would be some magical jump is a lie. Can you get better resolution? Yes. Better framerate? Yes. Better textures? Maybe. It is has never been cost effective to cater for high end systems. They make up the smallest market share of gaming as a whole.

Uninspiredcup

Normally I would've hyped this game to the max, but unfortunately they've started to release Civilization games in bits and pieces where you have to wait for multiple expansions to add basic features. I'm keeping my expectations in check after last two Civ games.

it's only temporary though, and the recharge takes a while.

Call of Duty and United Offensive, with maybe a slight edge to Brothers in Arms: Road to Hill 30.

Old news. Luckily the game still supports mods, so that's a relief. But I am still anti- DRM.

It's not alternate reality. Everything is grounded in real life. They aren't modifying old guns to make them work in a modern battlefield game.

I see a lot of WW1 is a boring setting for a FPS going around. But how can we know ? How many AAA shooters set in WW1 do we have ?

I always assumed Wild West would be a boring setting for a shooter, but I enjoyed Red Dead Redemption and Call of Juarez Gunslinger a lot ! Sometimes a game just needs to show a setting can work... to pave the way.