I don't know why "scripted" needs to be such a dirty word, I mean, especially if they can do scripted as well as this trailer makes the game look. It seems like every game that comes out nowadays has to be in an open world. But that doesn't necassarily make a game more immersive. Half Life 2 is still one of my favourite games of all time, and it was preeeeeetty heavily scripted. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. Scripting is an art of its own; making scripted sequences that don't make you feel like you're being led down a narrow path is a very skilled and delicate thing. I say, if Bioshock Infinite IS completely scripted...If it looks as good as the trailer throughout the entire game, then who cares if it's scripted. I think it looks awesome.

NO other industries ever have a problem with no making their money back because of second-hand sales...So why is it that game developers/publishers do? SPENDING $70M+ TO MAKE GAMES THAT SUCK. If you make something people want, they will buy it, and they will not sell it. Simple as that.

It does really suck that publishers and developers aren't making their money back because of piracy and second-hand sales, but it's a good point that maybe they shouldn't be spending $100 million dollars making a game, and another $50-100 million advertising it. Then maybe you could start selling games for $50 like they used to be, or even cheaper, and then there isn't much incentive to buy a used game, as you'd only be saving five or ten bucks.

Yeah my question is, why the f*** do you need to base your score on glitches and technical issues? You know that they will be fixed at some point, usually within a couple weeks. So after a few weeks, and especially after a few months, your review/score is totally off point. You've reviewed a game, and based it's score on something that no longer exists. If you insist on factoring technical issues into your score, then at least update your reviews whenever patches are made.

Okay, so yeah it was a bad idea to not protect the network better. But I really don't understand being pissed at Sony for something someone else did. It's like the cops arresting someone who's car was stolen because they didn't lock the door. Bottom line is, someone STOLE from Sony, which is not their fault. But there are people out there who blame them and not the d**chebags who did it, it doesn't make sense. Is it not bad to steal anymore? Are we going to start punishing the people who get stolen from instead "because they were asking for it"? That's just stupid.