uwlbpwnd's comments

Avatar image for uwlbpwnd
uwlbpwnd

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By uwlbpwnd

Wow, the funny thing here is that PS3 yet again fails to stack up. A few more textures, but to my eye it's far more polygonal and blocky than the 360. PC of course destroys both of the consoles, because PCs are awesome XD

Avatar image for uwlbpwnd
uwlbpwnd

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By uwlbpwnd

Honestly, "football," as it is so incorrectly called, is not that exciting. Its slow, its difficult to follow, everybody talks about plays that are impossible to recognize once they're in motion, etc. etc. I just don't understand why people get so hyped about a game that stops every 3-6 seconds. I mean sure, its fun to play down on the grass with the ball in your hands running like hell from a bunch of guys twice your size looking to flatten you, but as a spectator sport, it just doesn't translate. Hockey, the game of true sportsmen, is fast paced, exciting, rarely stops before play has gone on for a minute, exp. with the new rule system, and simply takes more skill than "football" will ever require. Why do you think its always the jocks who play "football"?

Avatar image for uwlbpwnd
uwlbpwnd

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By uwlbpwnd

Football, esp. American football, is an incredibly slow and overrated sport. I can't imagine why any right thinking human being would sacrifice their TV just for one game. Even the Stanley Cup games don't take a full day, and we have to play a MINIMUM of 4 games to get a champ. You call 1 game a fair analysis? So thank's, fans, but no thanks. I'll stick to playing my own games, and leave watching a bunch of over paid, under educated testosterone addicts beat the crap out of each other, to you.