tabyrd32's comments

Avatar image for tabyrd32
tabyrd32

@dashaka: he hasn't lost his mind at all. A large part of society has, though, which is something he touched on. But what, specifically, was "cringe"?

Avatar image for tabyrd32
tabyrd32

this is idiotic, all weapons irl are horrific. This isn't real life. It's a video game, which makes it fun. We know it's not fun irl.

Avatar image for tabyrd32
Avatar image for tabyrd32
tabyrd32

@kubiksc: that sounds about right, I still prefer Warhammer TW.

Avatar image for tabyrd32
tabyrd32

@artamisbgone: He's literally whining because it didn't go his way or line up with fan theories.

Avatar image for tabyrd32
tabyrd32

@mperry_2000: yes, it was very ironic considering the reviewer didn't know basic things about the show and the lore. Nice try trying to turn it around with your "NO YOU". much logic. These were more bullet points deconstructing everything the reviewer got wrong, some of which was objectively incorrect, not whining.

The reviewer wanted Arya to kill Bran and wear his face or he didn't know how the faceless blood magic works. The reviewer said the white walkers didn't hear Arya approach which is also incorrect, rewatch it if you don't believe me. They hear her and it was just too late, the reviewer was objectively incorrect. He also seemed to not know about the night king's/white walker's origin even though it's shown. He also called the white walkers a race, which is incorrect.

So how am I telling the reviewer what the show is about? by stating the theme about the lord of light? that's a theme, it's not what the show is about nor is it what I said the show was about, in fact I haven't made any claims as to what it's about.

Also here is the definition of patronize so you can use it correctly in the future:

treat in a way that is apparently kind or helpful but that betrays a feeling of superiority.

the first part of the definition is important.

if you're going to criticize something at least display proper knowledge on the subject instead of just bashing it over and over because things didn't go the way you wanted them to. Otherwise the reviewer is just being an ass towards the people who made this show, because you know many of them probably look at the reviews and read them, right? you know that right? This was slightly demeaning and disrespectful towards the people who made this show with a "I know better, I would have done better" attitude. Once again, because it didn't go the reviewers way of his perfect vision for the show. But yes, go with your "no you" argument.

Avatar image for tabyrd32
tabyrd32

@jimmychonga: Maybe to people are are missing certain details.

Avatar image for tabyrd32
tabyrd32

@darkranger23: Actually you're right, the entire reason Bran has the mark is because the Night King sensed him during a warging session.

Avatar image for tabyrd32
tabyrd32

@02050muh: Personally I loved the dark imagery. I didn't have trouble seeing what was happening, I think it just depends on your display. I bet it looked amazing for people with OLED tvs.

Avatar image for tabyrd32
tabyrd32

@Pyrosa: which acting did you find terrible? I've rewatched game of thrones, definitely love how the last thing ned says to jon is that they will talk about jons mother next time they meet. I don't think I've ever thought anyone's acting on this show was bad though. On the contrary I think this show has had an amazing array of actors, pretty much all of them seem to be great imo.