@jaredj: LOL....Got their act together? I have both consoles and I'm not very impressed with the ps4 lol only took sony what 8 years to make ps4 compatible so ppl can back up their games instead of switching internal hard drives and worrying about losing their content. Releasing another playstation 4 version just so ppl can play in 4k where as day one xbox's are eligible for 4k use already. Xbox one already being backwards compatible where as sony is CHARGING people to subscribe to an app that lets you STREAM old ps3 games, Half of which are only rpgs. Charging for psn every month which is fine but screwing people on their free games with indy crap which is an issue anyway because unless your into shooters most playstation users don't play online anyhow. Sony knows how to promote but then again so does Nintendo. Sony can keep the quantity of the sheep. Microsoft will keep the quality.
@onemanarmyasd: so ppl are idiots cause they like a casual hack and slash.... Well hell you said it so it must be true! No one buy this everyone!! Someone as irrelevant as onemanarmy said so!
@fpsfragggz: def not the same issues bf4 had but buttery smooth? Fun maps? The game definately does NOT have the replay value BF4 has. Granted obviously its ww1 and I know the tech back then was def not there but maybe being WW1 they should have left it alone. WW2 would have maybe been a better choice but hey Im keeping mine. Ill give it a fair 6 months. Just buttery smooth? No... the EA trial played much smoother then the full game
@vgmkyle: Took the words right out of my mouth...what also kills me is duke nukem 3d came out and got an 8.5 when it first hit streets in the 90s. They release it again...the exact game and it gets a 5. Editors on here are biased and blind as sh**.
stealthy1's comments