I haven't experienced it during WvW battles, just with PvE. I'm talking when there are like 8 waves of enemies with corpses all over the place, by the 5th or 6th wave enemies stop displaying due to the number of corpses.
During large battles with a lot of players, enemies, and corpses, eventually there get to be so many corpses and players that my game stops rendering new models beyond a couple yards. This means that I can't see or target any incoming enemies, and I can't see any enemies being fought a little ways away. Only 1 or 2 that are closeby.
Does anyone else experience this, and if so have you found anything in the options to fix it? Maybe an option to turn down the number of corpses displayed, so that it will load actual threats rather than dead enemies?
Much of the world would disagree you with on the settlements not being illegal. Even the Israeli laws consider them illegal, hence why Netanyahu announced 2 weeks ago that they're going to look into finding a way to legalize the settlement outposts.
And if Israel said they'd freeze their settlement construction, why did they announce new settlement construction more than once in recent months? The peace talks were derailed 2 years ago when the week before the talks were supposed to begin, Israel announced new settlement construction knowing full well that the Palestinians would be ticked off. They intentionally sabotaged the talks before they even started, and are preventing them from being able to come back to the table.
In regards to the attacks, I think you're confusing the PA with Hamas.
And as the leaked negotiation documents showed, it isn't the PA who is being uncooperative and unwilling to negotiate. Quite the opposite. Even the US is criticizing Israel for it's settlements derailing the peace process.
[QUOTE="mayceV"]IDK why either. They say its because Palestine is acting Unilaterally but the PA stated hundreds of times that they will go back into negotiations. the Actual text of the UN bid even says that negotiations will commence on the bases of he 1967 borders. So in reality there is no reason they should be saying no or vetoing it.SquirrelTamer
With redicilous preconditions that is. So in reality they have said quiete the opposite
How is it a ridiculous precondition to demand a stop to the illegal expansion into one's territory, when the negotiations are about said territory?
Mount & Blade-like gameplay crossed with Civilization's resource control, tile planning, technology research, exploration, and progression through centuries.
Log in to comment