simuseb2's forum posts

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#1 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@BboyStatix said:

Is it okay for a father to have intimate relationships with his daughter? Consensual of course. Logically speaking, I see no problem with it. I could say it's pretty natural. What do you guys think? Assume protection is used.

That's a toughie. I would like you clarify something: are you making a comparison between homosexuality and incest? I ask because I here a lot of people say that if homosexuality is acceptable, then so should pedophilia, incest and bestiality. If this is the case, I will refute all three comparisons.

1) Animals cannot cannot consent to sex with humans.

2) Children cannot consent.

3) Heterosexual incest has the potential to produce genetic issues in off springs.

The final point brings me to your question: is it okay for a father to have sexual intimate with his daughter? I'd say no, because even assuming protection, there is *still* the risk of inbreeding.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#2  Edited By simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@shadowguardian8 said:

I am not a coward. I just don't support the homosexual lifestyle because of my religious beliefs. I am a straight man ( love woman) but I waiting until marriage to have sex. I am not perfect, but I resist the urge to go porn websites out of love and respect for God. I believe in the values in his words. Like I said, some gays may have had same sex feelings at a young age, but they CHOSE to act of those feelings. It's their choice but they need to know not everyone is gonna support that. And forcing people to agree with it is just as bad as non religious people say about Christians.

It may be out dated to some, but since only a man and woman can reproduce and have stuff I think THAT is natural. Not two men and two women .

When you say you don't support it, but rather tolerate it, what does that mean exactly? I hope it simply means you'll keep your nose out of other people's sex lives because it is none of your business? That's it, right? If it is then that's completely okay. But if you are going to tell people that it's wrong for them to love another person, then that's going to be a problem. That would be borderline bullying. Ultimately, you don't have to support homosexuals, and they don't have to support your religion. Not everybody is religious (not sure what religion you are)and your morals are certainly not better than anybody else's.

Why does this topic even exist? There are already so many woes in this world, why do we need to worry about such unimportant things like homosexuality? I'd rather fight world hunger, poverty, violence, bullying etc. Just let the gays do their thing and move on. YOU don't have to be gay.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#3 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

What?

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#4 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@KBFloYd said:

finally....me buying all their 1st party games paid off...

:P

Except it's the third parties that need support on Nintendo consoles. 1st party games already sell well for the most part.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#5  Edited By simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

TC, what do you hope to gain from this argument, is my question. Are you hoping to outlaw homosexuality or merely educate people on it's "evils", so to speak. Because honestly, have you heard of freedom? I still don't understand why you are so concerned with who another human being chooses to have CONSENSUAL and, if they are properly educated, mostly safe sex. There are risks involving homosexual sex, you are right, and for the record this is mostly for anal sex- an act that many homosexuals do not even participate in. Anyway, let's assume you are right, and risk for contracting a sexually transmitted disease is higher through homosexual sex in comparison to heterosexual sex (generally speaking), my question is: so what? Next you'll be campaigning against ice cream, chocolate, alcohol, even video games, all of which have adverse effects on our bodies. Everything we do in life will one day lead to our death, so choose your poison.

Anyway, I noticed you talked about under population in your post earlier. Seriously? Right now we have the exact OPPOSITE problem: we are overpopulated! Even if we weren't overpopulated... and while society still exist... and even if homosexuals somehow became the majority, people will still reproduce. It is in our inherent nature to secretly want children. Think King Henry VIII, who executed and annualed his wives in a desperate (and failed) attempt to produce a male heir.

Remember, as other people have said, homosexuality is something that exists in all species. It's a bit of a stretch to say that it will one day be the dominant sexual orientation as it has not happened to any specie.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#6 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

Physical because it'll be $40 cheaper for me to do it that way... lol.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#7  Edited By simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@iHave2Fart said:

@big_mak523: I expected a silly response like this.

I brought up the Master Hand scenario as a minor point. I have also beaten him at 9.0 intensity, but it took dozens and dozens of tries and I ended up beating him with Robin. Half the time it just seemed as if nothing I did mattered and his attacks were unavoidable.

Haven't not played the 3DS version, (but I've played N64, Melee and Braw) I have to say that the master hand thing is not only a minor point, it is also a rather silly point. You are fighting playing at 9.0 intensity... that's the hardest difficulty! He's *meant* to be that hard to beat.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#8 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@spike6958 said:
@simuseb2 said:

Wait. Forty characters from the get go?

How many characters are there altogether? o_O

It's the same 52 character that the 3DS version has(if counting the Mii Fighter classes), but Bowser Jr, Ganondorf, Jigglypuff and Ness are unlocked from the the start, and with the Mewtwo DLC that's upped to 53.

I'm by no means complaining, but I think it would have been more exciting to have only 26-30 unlocked characters from the get go which would make 22 unlockable characters. I'm just thinking aloud. :c

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

This thread's a little old, but I thought I'd chime in with the PC specs for this game.

Look at it. If anyone still thinks the Wii U would be able to handle it they are kidding themselves. One only needs a quick glance at the Wii U's specs to understand why Ubisoft would stay the heck away from it. It is simply not worth the time and money to produce a down-scale product with very little return.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#10 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

Wait. Forty characters from the get go?

How many characters are there altogether? o_O