simuseb2's forum posts

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#1  Edited By simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@Malta_1980 said:

Well lems need to accept the low score, they should have known it was coming considering all the probs/issues with the game !!

What problems and issues are these exactly? It only got a six because there's a bug in the match-making system atm which, unfortunately, renders it almost impossible to play.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#2 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

Here's an idea.... play minecraft on a PC!

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

Just because Gamespot gave the Master Chief Collection a 6 doesn't mean it is a flop. First of all, there are many, many more reviewers out there and the majority have given it a high score. Secondly, the only reason it even got a six at gamespot is because there is a bug in the match-making system which 343 is working on fixing right now. It's a simple bug that can be fixed, and when it is, that score will then mean NOTHING. That's ultimately irrelevant though. People will still pay money to play all four games remastered in one package. If you think a simple 6 will stop the masses from buying it then you've obviously haven't been paying attention to Destiny.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#4 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

Here's an idea: while you wait for them to fix matchmaking, play the four campaigns with 40+ hours of game play! I wish I could play it NOW, but you know, priorities :( Have to wait til Tuesday.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#5  Edited By simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

It's a little too late for that now, surely? The game comes out in less than a week!

I hate the White Xbox One. It stands out way too much.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#6 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

If they remove region lock, Nintendo can start taking (more) of my money again!

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#7 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@BboyStatix said:

And Adam and Eve? Evolved from apes? Can someone explain how it fits in with the theory, as in how something evolved into Adam and then the evolution of another something into Adam's mate Eve? Quite curious

Considering that evolution directly contradicts creationism the pope is essentially throwing creationism out the door.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#8  Edited By simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@BboyStatix said:

@simuseb2: Hmm I guess you're right that it's pretty hard to regulate. Hmm but in the case of homosexuality isn't anal sex extremely harmful for the body?

Straight people engage in anal sex all the time so that's a moot point. But either way, if you are going to outlaw sodomy because you are worried about people damaging themselves, then you'll also need to outlaw ice cream, alcohol and many, many other harmful substances. In case you didn't know, that would be a nanny state.The difference between inbreeding and taking risks with your OWN body is that you would forcing the child to have genetic defects in the former.That's just not fair on them.

Also, you exaggerate how harmful anal sex really is. It can be done quite safely.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#9 simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@BboyStatix said:

In terms of physical ability, intelligence, attractiveness,etc. Are we equivalent? And if not, should we be treated as exact equals before the law? As in, both genders have equal responsibility. Like women should be forced to do something that men do normally, and vice versa? Is equality = justice?

Actually I'm kinda asking this cuz yesterday a girl was talking to me about how much better the world would run if it were run by women and that women can do whatever a man can do. I didn't argue back because I want to consider her argument rationally first.

I mean I can easily put up arguments without proof like, men are just as good at cooking as women (e.g. Gordon Ramsay), just as attractive (we don't need make-up), etc. But I think these are foolish arguments that refer to the exception and not the rule.

They are as equal as apples and oranges.

Avatar image for simuseb2
simuseb2

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#10  Edited By simuseb2
Member since 2014 • 178 Posts

@BboyStatix said:

@simuseb2: I mean if it's consensual and the daughter is of age and they use protection. I don't think there should be a problem then. So the lgbt movement should include this as well. I didn't mention paedophilia because there's the obvious logical reason that you have mentioned.

And as the people in the thread mentioned. Sex is not just for reproduction. In the evolutionary aspect I guess it is but anyways I really have no idea haha

Well yeah, I know that sex is not just for reproduction, but how would you regulate something like what you're suggestion? So, you suggest they be allowed to have sex but not reproduce. Does that mean that if they have children you suggest imprisoning the parents thus scarring their new children for life?