@handicapgamerz: Another person who fails at understanding context. He was talking about games games games and not hardware. I pointed out FPS in a context that is CLEARLY about First Person Shooters and he ran in the completely opposite direction rambling about monitors.

@pedrolopes1313: That's not my point but thanks for trying. We'll be back next week folks!

@handicapgamerz: Read it again. He's rambling all over the place and I'm trying to keep him focused. I mean, did you see the size of his monitor rant?

@manu_pt: So...it's not about popularity, it's about userbase size...which you then say is fed by popularity? You're bad at this mate.

@manu_pt: No, my point is that the games are simply better on PC in every way. You seem to think this is about popularity which, combined with your poor reasoning and reading skills, make me think you should be studying for an exam junior.

@manu_pt: Someone's cherry picking now! You should read his original comment before spouting off. Add that to the list along with keeping acronyms in context and, since I pity you terribly at this point, I meant (F)irst (P)erson (S)hooter, which in the context of games is the only logical conclusion. But kudos on that epic off-topic ramble about monitors, it was impressive.

@manu_pt: In the context of his other comment (which I'm sure you didn't read) about PC elitists spending too much money, it's quite a nice jab I made considering you'd be well over a grand to have all the systems and those games. Context is important, just like knowing your acronyms before you embark on enormous rants.

And now you're bringing strawmen arguments too!

@manu_pt: still working on that acronym eh champ? And do you even know what a strawman argument is, Mr. Rants-off-topic?

@pedrolopes1313: strawmen, this early in the morning?

@manu_pt: And this children, is what we call a lie, likely springing from damage control.