I lied!! Decided this day to shelve this game for awhile and went back to re-visit Rome-1. Looking at all the parameters of this old game, I have come to realize just how great this game is to play. It's too bad that CA didn't keep the good of Rome-1 and build on it. Have also dusted off Med-2.
I must say that having followed the TW series from the start- Shogun- 1(exception Napoleon) that this was the most hyped, most anticipated of the lot, but to me, it has become the most disappointing. My rig is powerful enough to handle this game on Ultra but come the battle scenes it gets down graded. I agree with most of the comments here regarding the tech. tree limitations, the battle strategy, or lack thereof, and for some reason, the general feeling that we are not immersed to any degree in the battles when compared to Rome -1 or Med.-2. I hope that CA learns from this disgrace if and when they get around to doing Med.-3. I am going to finish my one and only campaign and then it's back to Med-2 and Shogun-2.
155. Get serious. OK for the really serious gamer who just wants to shoot marbles out of that catapult at the cat, it might be worth it. I will stick to the no frills, basic product. Looking forward to it.
Has it really been 10 years since WC?? God, I loved that game (there were two -no?). The cut scenes with live actors just pushed the storyline along like no other flight sim since. Tnx Chris- PC'ers are not dead.
All they are trying to do is capture a diff. segment of the playing population. It has nothing to do with realistic portrayal of our human race at this point; it is only about money.
sextus1's comments