rhodes1's forum posts

Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts
At least he got payed well
Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts

I posted this story here the other day and alot of people thought it was bullshti and that the MIcrosoft symbol on the shirt was photoshopped.

 

Now heres solid proof, watch this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3I3BeTVRJo

Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts

http://gonintendo.com/?mode=viewstory&id=205110

 

 

Every day they just get more pathetic

Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts

Forgot one thing . . with the CLOUD XBone will be running Pixar graphics at 520 FPS on 4080p

Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=576869

 

XBone is just an upgraded Wii-U . . lul

Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts

[QUOTE="rhodes1"][QUOTE="Mr720fan"] Knockout punchronvalencia

What? MMO games REQUIRE High-End PC systems to run the Graphics/physics etc. the only thing the "Server" does in an MMO is the same thing a server does in Halo/Call of duty or any other online game! Which is to combine all the clients into one persistent world to play in. This whole Xbox "Cloud" thing is nothing more than a bunch of servers which ANY company can do. Blizzard is doing it right now with WoW, I am sure Blizzard likely owns 100,000+ servers to run there games . . but they dont use stupid buzzwords like "cloud". The Xbox One "Cloud" CAN NEVER, WILL NEVER ADD ANY GRAPHIC UPGRADES TO ANY NEXT-GEN GAME EVER. . . . EVERRRRRRRRRR If you had a single clue how games work you would never think it did in the first place.

MMO doesn't require high-end PC systems i.e. I can run Star Trek Online or WOW from my laptop.

Next-Gen MMO's will require high-end PC's not a **** 10 year old game . . .

Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"][QUOTE="LegatoSkyheart"]

Onlive failed guys.

Mr720fan
MMO server/client model is successful.

Knockout punch

What? MMO games REQUIRE High-End PC systems to run the Graphics/physics etc. the only thing the "Server" does in an MMO is the same thing a server does in Halo/Call of duty or any other online game! Which is to combine all the clients into one persistent world to play in. This whole Xbox "Cloud" thing is nothing more than a bunch of servers which ANY company can do. Blizzard is doing it right now with WoW, I am sure Blizzard likely owns 100,000+ servers to run there games . . but they dont use stupid buzzwords like "cloud". The Xbox One "Cloud" CAN NEVER, WILL NEVER ADD ANY GRAPHIC UPGRADES TO ANY NEXT-GEN GAME EVER. . . . EVERRRRRRRRRR If you had a single clue how games work you would never think it did in the first place.
Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts

[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

The problem with your post TC is that you have to actually believe M$ actually cares about making xbone have better graphics than PS4.  

Ask yourself, do you really think M$ cares about people's gaming experinces...when they come out saying they want to compete with google and apple for TV market space?  Look at how they left the 360.  MS doesn't want to invest in games at all because it's a risk every time and they don't want to waste any money on anything that they don't think will give them an instant and guarenteed turn around.

That's why they wanted to make xbone always online to ensure that even if they don't produce any games they will still get money out of you to keep the system running.  

The only think M$ REALLY wants to do with cloud is to use kinect to collect customers information to store it in their servers to send people ads.  PERIOD.  The mention of xbox 1 using cloud to increace gaming performance was never a serious idea from MS, they know what you said in your OP probably better than anyone else...they are a software compnay after all. 

casharmy

 

You are spewing assumptions.  And all your posts sound like you're having a conniption.

and also I have a pretty good basis for my argument here.  I can't make a factual statement that MS does not care about gamer experince but the direction they are trying to move in suggests they would be willing to drop it if they could have something else that reqired less investments on their part. 

The whole cloud thing also isn't without a logical foundation...I will ask you two question if you believe I am so wrong.  

1. Why did MS say they want kinect to always be connected and always on?  

2. Way was/is that so important to them and what significance does that serve for them?

Because for Microsoft the gamer is the product and Kinect is the key on how to sell the information. Microsoft sees a future in where the Kinect will be in every home watching and listening to everything, picking up key words, scanning the room, scanning the brands of clothes you wear. It just so happens Microsoft is also planning to build a CCTV state of the art facility in every city in the USA with the 1st being built in NYC this summer and rapid expansion soon after . . . with all this CCTV/Kinect/Bing etc all feeding into a massive server(300,000) complex in Ohio. SO basically Microsoft wants to sell you and spy on you for the government. My personal theory is that EVEN COMPLETE IDIOTS, the so called "Bro-gamers" will not fall for it . . .does microsoft think the "bro-gamer" in college or even the Dad bro gamer wants a Kinect spying on them? Even the most hardcore Madden/CoD fan who is brain-dead has enough brain cells to rub together to understand that having a HD camera in there private space is not a good thing to have.
Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]Infinite power > DDR5 Deal with it.

lul
Avatar image for rhodes1
rhodes1

1488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

68

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 rhodes1
Member since 2004 • 1488 Posts
No, if i had a choice between PS4's RAW superior Tech Specs with a 50% increase in terraflops and DDR5 Ram compared to a "THEORITICAL" increase of 50% terraflops on some imaginary "cloud" service THAT NO DEVELOPER MAKING NEXT-GEN GAMES WILL EVER RISK DOING than I would take the PS4's raw power. This whole CLoud bullshit was a last second play by Microsoft after they found out that PS4 has superior Raw power.